2008 Mazda 6 photos!
#1
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
2008 Mazda 6 photos!
More at:
http://www.fomoconews.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1218
I like it! However, there is a bit of a resemblence to the previous gen Camry in the front.
#3
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Serbian Steamer
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
#11
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#12
A fantastic looking car to be sure. But I question the value of Mazda as just one more player in the 'world platform' stage. Mazda is quickly becoming a Japanese version of what Mercury once was and I am just not certain that putting a Kimono on a Ford is the best way to use the Mazda brand. Particularly when you consider Volvo's recntly assumed position as Ford of Europe's 'Lincoln' for lack of a better comparison.
#13
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
A fantastic looking car to be sure. But I question the value of Mazda as just one more player in the 'world platform' stage. Mazda is quickly becoming a Japanese version of what Mercury once was and I am just not certain that putting a Kimono on a Ford is the best way to use the Mazda brand. Particularly when you consider Volvo's recntly assumed position as Ford of Europe's 'Lincoln' for lack of a better comparison.
#14
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't agree at all. Merc's problem was that it was, for most of its life, simply another trim level. You felt like MERC should have been an option box you could check at the Ford dealership. Mazda and Volvo using the basic platform as a starting point still create vastly different products. Take the CX-9 for example: noone I've heard from has ever said "oh its an Edge with more options," yet they share the same basic platfor and basic engine package. Why? Becuase they're not the same, even with the shared platform and engine. Thats what Merc should have been years ago, and some day may be.
#15
Bullitt Member
Join Date: February 17, 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't agree at all. Merc's problem was that it was, for most of its life, simply another trim level. You felt like MERC should have been an option box you could check at the Ford dealership. Mazda and Volvo using the basic platform as a starting point still create vastly different products. Take the CX-9 for example: noone I've heard from has ever said "oh its an Edge with more options," yet they share the same basic platfor and basic engine package. Why? Becuase they're not the same, even with the shared platform and engine. Thats what Merc should have been years ago, and some day may be.
#18
Yep, but take another look at that stance and overall profile and tell me how much new Mondeo you see in there. I'll bet dollars to donuts this car has nothing to do with CD3 and that there is an EUCD chassis underneath that body.
#20
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter