2005 LNR Mustang
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
Joined: March 17, 2005
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Was up in Englishtown, NJ this passed weekend for FFW. Stopped by LaRocca's Performance to get a dyno pull on the car to see what the A/F was at and to see what kind of power the car was making from some simple bolt ons.
The first pull I got 328 RWHP / 337 RWTQ but the A/F was up at like 16.8. The car was running way lean. So thanks to Chris Jones of Blow-By Racing and Anthony of LaRocca they adjusted the A/F down to 13.2 and for the second pull we got a pretty impressive 338.8 RWHP / 346.2 RWTQ out of the car. There is still a lot of tuning to do on this car. Since there is no program writen for Ported 3V Heads + the JLT tune really isn't writen in stone yet either. So Chris and Charlie of SCT are going to sit down and figure out whats going on and get some top notch numbers out of this car. I should be looking at around 360-380 RWHP with some serious tuning and variable cam timing adjustments.
But I must say... That power w/ the 4.10 Gears. 2nd Gear rips lose from a roll. It's very nice!
The first pull I got 328 RWHP / 337 RWTQ but the A/F was up at like 16.8. The car was running way lean. So thanks to Chris Jones of Blow-By Racing and Anthony of LaRocca they adjusted the A/F down to 13.2 and for the second pull we got a pretty impressive 338.8 RWHP / 346.2 RWTQ out of the car. There is still a lot of tuning to do on this car. Since there is no program writen for Ported 3V Heads + the JLT tune really isn't writen in stone yet either. So Chris and Charlie of SCT are going to sit down and figure out whats going on and get some top notch numbers out of this car. I should be looking at around 360-380 RWHP with some serious tuning and variable cam timing adjustments.
But I must say... That power w/ the 4.10 Gears. 2nd Gear rips lose from a roll. It's very nice!
Bullitt Member
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Wow that is going to be impressive with a blower of some sorts. Hey BBR does the way you port the heads affect compression ration at all becuase of a change in the combustion chamber b/c if it does that might be good for blower people.
I talk to cones.
Joined: April 25, 2005
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Originally posted by JohnnyZ@May 24, 2005, 11:55 PM
Was up in Englishtown, NJ this passed weekend for FFW. Stopped by LaRocca's Performance to get a dyno pull on the car to see what the A/F was at and to see what kind of power the car was making from some simple bolt ons.
The first pull I got 328 RWHP / 337 RWTQ but the A/F was up at like 16.8. The car was running way lean. So thanks to Chris Jones of Blow-By Racing and Anthony of LaRocca they adjusted the A/F down to 13.2 and for the second pull we got a pretty impressive 338.8 RWHP / 346.2 RWTQ out of the car. There is still a lot of tuning to do on this car. Since there is no program writen for Ported 3V Heads + the JLT tune really isn't writen in stone yet either. So Chris and Charlie of SCT are going to sit down and figure out whats going on and get some top notch numbers out of this car. I should be looking at around 360-380 RWHP with some serious tuning and variable cam timing adjustments.
But I must say... That power w/ the 4.10 Gears. 2nd Gear rips lose from a roll. It's very nice!
Was up in Englishtown, NJ this passed weekend for FFW. Stopped by LaRocca's Performance to get a dyno pull on the car to see what the A/F was at and to see what kind of power the car was making from some simple bolt ons.
The first pull I got 328 RWHP / 337 RWTQ but the A/F was up at like 16.8. The car was running way lean. So thanks to Chris Jones of Blow-By Racing and Anthony of LaRocca they adjusted the A/F down to 13.2 and for the second pull we got a pretty impressive 338.8 RWHP / 346.2 RWTQ out of the car. There is still a lot of tuning to do on this car. Since there is no program writen for Ported 3V Heads + the JLT tune really isn't writen in stone yet either. So Chris and Charlie of SCT are going to sit down and figure out whats going on and get some top notch numbers out of this car. I should be looking at around 360-380 RWHP with some serious tuning and variable cam timing adjustments.
But I must say... That power w/ the 4.10 Gears. 2nd Gear rips lose from a roll. It's very nice!
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
Joined: March 17, 2005
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
there is alot more potential out of these cars that no one even knows about. I'm working with SCT and Blow-By Racing to try and find some of this hiden horsepower!
Cobra Member
Joined: February 10, 2005
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 1
I saw JohnnyZ car tonight in person!!! OMFG!!! It is the best 05!! you all truely have to see and hear her to appreciate her.. It is so amazing. The pictures posted in the past here do it NO justice.. Unbelievable. It looks fantastic.
I talk to cones.
Joined: April 25, 2005
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Originally posted by JohnnyZ@May 26, 2005, 11:06 AM
there is alot more potential out of these cars that no one even knows about. I'm working with SCT and Blow-By Racing to try and find some of this hiden horsepower!
there is alot more potential out of these cars that no one even knows about. I'm working with SCT and Blow-By Racing to try and find some of this hiden horsepower!
Mach 1 Member
Joined: May 5, 2005
Posts: 640
Likes: 0
Originally posted by softbatch@May 28, 2005, 1:48 PM
Sweet keep us posted I am going to try and make about as much NA horses as possible while still being able to drive it on the street. Luckily Alabama has no emissions.
Sweet keep us posted I am going to try and make about as much NA horses as possible while still being able to drive it on the street. Luckily Alabama has no emissions.
Same here!!!
I think it's much more impressive to have a car make 380 NA rwhp than to do it with a blower. Plus from a durabilty stand point the NA motor has a better chance of lasting than the forced induction motor. Although I think 380 rwhp without a blower is a little far fetched for these motors IMO. A more realistic number in my opinion would be 350 rwhp or about 400 hp at the crank when you factor in the 15% drive line loss. Still a pretty stout number in my book. 
I talk to cones.
Joined: April 25, 2005
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Originally posted by StangFreak@May 29, 2005, 11:14 AM
Same here!!! I think it's much more impressive to have a car make 380 NA rwhp than to do it with a blower. Plus from a durabilty stand point the NA motor has a better chance of lasting than the forced induction motor. Although I think 380 rwhp without a blower is a little far fetched for these motors IMO. A more realistic number in my opinion would be 350 rwhp or about 400 hp at the crank when you factor in the 15% drive line loss. Still a pretty stout number in my book.
Same here!!!
I think it's much more impressive to have a car make 380 NA rwhp than to do it with a blower. Plus from a durabilty stand point the NA motor has a better chance of lasting than the forced induction motor. Although I think 380 rwhp without a blower is a little far fetched for these motors IMO. A more realistic number in my opinion would be 350 rwhp or about 400 hp at the crank when you factor in the 15% drive line loss. Still a pretty stout number in my book. Same here I am going to at least get into the 320 RWHP realm fairly quickly after getting my car, I hope anyways
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whysoserious
05-09 Interior and Audio Mods
3
Oct 27, 2023 06:42 PM