GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Would you rather....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9/10/07, 03:22 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
2006GT500's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2006
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would you rather....

Have a D1SC or a Kenne bell 2.4? And why? I'm thinking of selling my D1 in order to buy another members 2.4, just haven't figured out if thats what I want to do or not. I know what kind of power I can make on my D1 and don't think I can make it on a 2.4. However, instant boost would be fun too. Give me your opinions and why you feel that way.
Old 9/10/07, 03:25 PM
  #2  
Cobra Member
 
PACETTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2004
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DD = KB
Track Car = D1
Good luck either way!
Old 9/10/07, 03:39 PM
  #3  
Mach 1 Member
 
anthony05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 12, 2006
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree. D1 for track...KB for street. If you don't like noise go KB too.
Old 9/10/07, 03:51 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
 
2006GT500's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2006
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I made 523rwhp and 493rwtq with my current set up and there aren't many guys making that power on a KB however my power is way up top is there anything to make the power come on sooner in the rpms.
Old 9/10/07, 04:01 PM
  #5  
Legacy TMS Member
 
70MACH1OWNER's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 9, 2005
Location: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by 2006GT500
I made 523rwhp and 493rwtq with my current set up and there aren't many guys making that power on a KB however my power is way up top is there anything to make the power come on sooner in the rpms.
I have never owned a centrifugal. I have had a KenneBell on a 96 Cobra. All I can say is when you are driving around normally every day you are not at WOT. Peak HP does not make for a fun daily driver. Twinscrews are the only way you want to leave a stoplight everytime. And 0-50 you will never beat a twinscrew.
Scott
Old 9/10/07, 04:37 PM
  #6  
 
don_w's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 70MACH1OWNER
I have never owned a centrifugal. I have had a KenneBell on a 96 Cobra. All I can say is when you are driving around normally every day you are not at WOT. Peak HP does not make for a fun daily driver. Twinscrews are the only way you want to leave a stoplight everytime. And 0-50 you will never beat a twinscrew.
Scott
Yea, what he said.

In fact, I'll add that "peak HP" is pretty much a useless number in general (even for a track car). What matters is what kind of torque and HP numbers you're getting throughout the entire RPM range. Unless you're at Bonneville shooting for a sustained top speed record, "peak" HP rarely comes into play at all.
Old 9/10/07, 05:46 PM
  #7  
Former Vendor
 
TillmanSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 11, 2007
Location: Aston, PA
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Building the bottom end up will take care of spool time, and get that low end up to par!
Old 9/10/07, 06:50 PM
  #8  
Mach 1 Member
 
anthony05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 12, 2006
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Building the bottom end up? To what, high compression? Exactly what you don't want with a blower.
Old 9/10/07, 07:22 PM
  #9  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Having driven several S197s with TS and owning one with a centri, for me I'd stay with the centri. Both are great; both have pros and cons. Depends on what you want to do with the car...... evaluate that first, and then make up your mind.
Old 9/10/07, 07:40 PM
  #10  
Mach 1 Member
 
Willie's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 14, 2006
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've read a lot on this forum about how centrifugals don't have any low-end...... I've owned three centrifugals, from a Paxton to a D1SC and also an F1. I've discovered that they are low to build boost ONLY when it is pullied for low boost applications, i.e. 10-psig....

Given the crank and blower pulley diameters, I can calculate engine rpm at blower redline and once I've installed the correct pullies to "match" the blower to the engine redline, low end boost has NEVER been an issue. In fact, my last setup on my IROC-Z (prior to going to twin turbos) was an F1 with twin air-to-air intercoolers. The car had 3.73's with a 3.06 first gear ratioed 700R4 and a 3,500 rpm stall 5-disc Vigilante converter. Even with burnouts on E/T Streets, launching at 1,000 rpms (yes, barely off idle), I'd hit boost almost instantaneously and would have a tendency of going sideways. In my prior years with pullies making less boost, I never had this problem.

Centrifugals with air-to-air intercoolers are my design by choice and once it's matched to the car's gearing, there's no better way to go -- low-end boost and high-end power.....
Old 9/11/07, 08:03 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
 
2006GT500's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2006
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So Willie how do I go about getting everything lined up to make low end boost?
Old 9/11/07, 01:00 PM
  #12  
Mach 1 Member
 
Willie's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 14, 2006
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So Willie how do I go about getting everything lined up to make low end boost?

Before I answer, I need to know a couple of things:

1) What diameter pullies do you now have?
2) How much boost are you making and at what rpm?
3) What is your best 1/4-mile ET and mph?
4) Auto or manual?

Funny how you should be asking a Chevy guy !!

Willie
Old 9/11/07, 02:57 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
 
2006GT500's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2006
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1) I have the biggest of the 3 that came with my kit on
2) 11 psi at 5500rpm
3) N/A
4) manual
Old 9/11/07, 04:22 PM
  #14  
Mach 1 Member
 
Willie's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 14, 2006
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In order to calculate blower rpms, I need to know the pulley diameter of both the crank and blower pullies.....

FYI, I used to have a D1SC too with both a 12-rib and cog pulley system. I experimented a LOT with different pullies. This spreadsheet is one of many I used to compile data to best select pullies on my IROC-Z when I had the D1SC many years ago.

Willie
Attached Files
File Type: xls
Blower Pulley Ratios 3.xls (15.5 KB, 134 views)
Old 9/11/07, 07:26 PM
  #15  
Cobra Member
 
Faber's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2005
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was pondering the boost curve for centrifugals and thinking "if you had it pullied for big boost early on, what do you do if you have too much later in the rpm range?" and I thought well since it is centrifugal, whay not add a wastegate to insure you dont go over a specific amount of boost? is this do-able? here is some food for thought:

http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/te..._supercharged/
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.c...=177194&page=9
http://forums.clubrsx.com/archive/in.../t-215998.html

but maybe someone on here already knows...
Old 9/11/07, 08:27 PM
  #16  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Yes it is doable; there was a recent magazine article. This is where I want to end up eventually..... for now I am going to settle for relatively moderate boost ~11/12psi to help get into it quicker and then reduce timing on the topend to help stay conservative.




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:34 AM.