What mods for some nice gains?
#1
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: July 10, 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What mods for some nice gains?
Ok so Im going to get the JLT II CAI with the Xcalibrator 3 combo from bamachips. Now what other mods are there and how much do they cost, to add some substantial HP? Ideas?
#2
Former Vendor
Join Date: January 11, 2007
Location: Aston, PA
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Go with delete plates as well. You'll be happy with the gains from that, the intake, and tune.
CR (Chris Rose)
Tillman Speed, Inc.
www.TillmanSpeed.com
CR (Chris Rose)
Tillman Speed, Inc.
www.TillmanSpeed.com
#3
Legacy TMS Member
Join Date: January 9, 2005
Location: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Well the first question I need to ask you is "how much do you want to spend"? If you have 1K then this is what I would buy. They are the biggest bang for the buck out there for a N/A car.
Scott
Scott
#8
Cobra Member
I've seen your dyno sheet so I believe in the results. Question though. I was reading that thread with the other guy not having delete plates and he lost alot of low end power. Is that accurate or was it something else?
#9
Legacy TMS Member
Join Date: January 9, 2005
Location: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Hey Scott...I hate you..lol..You make me spend to much money because I see all that you buy and want it also.
I've seen your dyno sheet so I believe in the results. Question though. I was reading that thread with the other guy not having delete plates and he lost alot of low end power. Is that accurate or was it something else?
I've seen your dyno sheet so I believe in the results. Question though. I was reading that thread with the other guy not having delete plates and he lost alot of low end power. Is that accurate or was it something else?
Hey Colby,
How's things going out there?? We are in the middle of a freaking blizzard here this weekend. Yes you are correct that on another thread that Fabre lost a bunch of low end torque with his cam install. The difference is he has BBR cams that have alot more duration or overlap in their grind to give him a awesome sounding idle.(Lopey). Where I have the Comp NSR cams and they were made to give the best power possible. My idle does not sound like his. You can't have both I am sorry to say. I can't say if I lost any torque below 3000rpm since the dyno pull starts about there. My butt-o-meter can't tell any difference at all. But here is my dyno sheet from Feb 15th. The different between these pulls were the Comp cams, delete plates and my longtubes. (But I was already offroad in Oct.) Peak to Peak I picked up 41 rwhp and 17 lbs. of torque. I think it is a worthwhile mod. According to the dyno sheet it looks like I picked up HP and Torque down lower than before. But the pulls were not started at the same rpm.
Scott
Last edited by 70MACH1OWNER; 3/7/08 at 03:26 PM.
#11
Cobra R Member
Join Date: August 9, 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#12
Legacy TMS Member
Join Date: January 9, 2005
Location: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
I think it's this one.
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/showth...ighlight=faber
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/showth...ighlight=faber
I also wondered if that was the one he was talking about.. If so... they are a totally different cams with a totally different grinds. The end purpose of the BBR and the Comp Cams was totally different from the start.
#13
Cobra Member
Your gains are awesome Scott. Guess I better add them to my wish list. That economy check is coming up..woohoo.
PS. Blue sky's all week here. Although it is raining out now.
PS. Blue sky's all week here. Although it is raining out now.
#14
Cobra Member
Join Date: September 10, 2004
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Colby,
How's things going out there?? We are in the middle of a freaking blizzard here this weekend. Yes you are correct that on another thread that Fabre lost a bunch of low end torque with his cam install. The difference is he has BBR cams that have alot more duration or overlap in their grind to give him a awesome sounding idle.(Lopey). Where I have the Comp NSR cams and they were made to give the best power possible. My idle does not sound like his. You can't have both I am sorry to say. I can't say if I lost any torque below 3000rpm since the dyno pull starts about there. My butt-o-meter can't tell any difference at all. But here is my dyno sheet from Feb 15th. The different between these pulls were the Comp cams, delete plates and my longtubes. (But I was already offroad in Oct.) Peak to Peak I picked up 41 rwhp and 17 lbs. of torque. I think it is a worthwhile mod. According to the dyno sheet it looks like I picked up HP and Torque down lower than before. But the pulls were not started at the same rpm.
Scott
How's things going out there?? We are in the middle of a freaking blizzard here this weekend. Yes you are correct that on another thread that Fabre lost a bunch of low end torque with his cam install. The difference is he has BBR cams that have alot more duration or overlap in their grind to give him a awesome sounding idle.(Lopey). Where I have the Comp NSR cams and they were made to give the best power possible. My idle does not sound like his. You can't have both I am sorry to say. I can't say if I lost any torque below 3000rpm since the dyno pull starts about there. My butt-o-meter can't tell any difference at all. But here is my dyno sheet from Feb 15th. The different between these pulls were the Comp cams, delete plates and my longtubes. (But I was already offroad in Oct.) Peak to Peak I picked up 41 rwhp and 17 lbs. of torque. I think it is a worthwhile mod. According to the dyno sheet it looks like I picked up HP and Torque down lower than before. But the pulls were not started at the same rpm.
Scott
However, I would say the biggest bang for the buck for me thus far would be the Longtubes (Totaling $850 for tune, LTs, catted x) or the gears totalling $400 after parts and install
#15
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: November 14, 2007
Location: Pacific NW USA
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
6 Posts
Another very worthwhile mod to help accelerate your GT (without needing more HP) is a steeper set of gears. I chose 4.10's for my car, but any ratio between 3.73 and 4.56 would be a great improvement over the factory 3.31's. And, with the overdrive 5th gear ratio, even the 4.30's or 4.56's aren't too steep for our cars on the freeway, so don't worry about getting too much gear. I paid $300 for parts (ring & pinion, plus install kit) and about $300 for the install at the local Ford dealership (rear end was already apart for a TSB for low speed groan upon turning, so I saved some labor expense).
So, for about $1,300 in parts & labor, I took a car that would run high 13.9's to 14.0's at about 99-100 mph in the 1/4 mile stock, and turned it into a much more entertaining daily driver that runs 13.2's to 13.3's at 102-103 mph in the 1/4 mile.
#16
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: July 10, 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice rundown that explains alot. I relly like the idea of getting some 3.73 gears. I think id like a little more kick and from what ive heard it changes the feel so to speek completely! Im also going to look into the cams. although i dont want to spend 1k right now this is really only the beggining of the mod season. This thread is geat by the way.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post