GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9/12/05, 07:08 PM
  #41  
 
MyFastGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 29, 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Weedo@September 12, 2005, 6:15 PM
So it looks like you're right about where I was at with the crappy base Predator Tune. Has yours been tuned or are you still using the "base tune"? So far I'm at about an extra 60rwhp just changing the Tune and TB. More tweaks to come tomorrow, but I'm keeping this "safe" on 91 Octane.

subzero05 - Good point, if it was free I'd take it too! Let us know how it turns out for you. Inquiring minds want to know...
Mine has been cutom tuned with a "safe" 93 octane tune. I was using a canned tune but with a S/C a custom tune is a must. I was thinking of installing a 62mm throttle body but I am not sure how much it will benefit me.
Old 9/12/05, 07:48 PM
  #42  
Mach 1 Member
 
ILikeBond's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 19, 2005
Location: Santa Clara
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Clem@September 11, 2005, 11:52 AM
Here's a cool video of two '05 GTs running Vortechs.

http://www.cprace.com/videos/05%20Mustang%20.wmv
Shame one dude had to go and ruin a poor, defenseless supercharged mustang by putting ricer-oni neon lights on the underside.

WTF!?!
Old 9/12/05, 08:06 PM
  #43  
Bullitt Member
 
gt5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 14, 2004
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by ILikeBond@September 12, 2005, 7:51 PM
Shame one dude had to go and ruin a poor, defenseless supercharged mustang by putting ricer-oni neon lights on the underside.

WTF!?!
werd
Old 9/12/05, 08:11 PM
  #44  
Mach 1 Member
 
TURBO 05's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
may i suggest http://www.turbochargedpower.com/
Old 9/13/05, 09:17 AM
  #45  
Mach 1 Member
 
Shea's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 24, 2004
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbo for racing applications, twin screw for street use. I'm not really sure where this misinformation about centrifugals is coming from, but centris are not as powerful as an efficient twin screw, and I'm not sure why you would want an S/C in the first place if you are worried about controlling the power of your car. JMO though!
Old 9/13/05, 12:36 PM
  #46  
GT Member
 
TK421's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 27, 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by subzero05@September 11, 2005, 5:30 PM
I have the non intercooled vortech kit.That one in the pic is the I/c with and additional ice chill system that as far as I know vortech does not offer.I will be upgrading ot the I/c system within the month however.
Vortech has two water boxes available for the 2005 Mustang GT. One is the smaller box that comes in their H.O kit. They also have an upgraded tank for racing applications. This optional larger tank mounts in the factory battery location (must move the battery to trunk). It has a large quick fill neck for ice. This larger tank is the one shown in the picture that was previously posted.
Old 9/13/05, 02:01 PM
  #47  
Cobra Member
 
subzero05's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so the H.o kit has a water box along with the aftercooler unit itself?..If this is the case I have not seen that, but nice..
Old 9/13/05, 05:32 PM
  #48  
V6 Member
 
Weedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 18, 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Shea@September 13, 2005, 8:20 AM
Turbo for racing applications, twin screw for street use. I'm not really sure where this misinformation about centrifugals is coming from, but centris are not as powerful as an efficient twin screw, and I'm not sure why you would want an S/C in the first place if you are worried about controlling the power of your car. JMO though!
Good point, my centri is only putting out another 190rwhp over stock.........
Old 9/13/05, 06:15 PM
  #49  
Cobra Member
 
subzero05's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
right on weedo...us vortech/paxton people need to stick together :worship:
Old 9/13/05, 07:30 PM
  #50  
V6 Member
 
Weedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 18, 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by subzero05@September 13, 2005, 5:18 PM
right on weedo...us vortech/paxton people need to stick together :worship:
Yep, blanket statements like that always kill me. I've had both types of superchargers and turbos. They all have pros and cons!
Old 9/13/05, 07:32 PM
  #51  
Mach 1 Member
 
TURBO 05's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Shea@September 13, 2005, 9:20 AM
Turbo for racing applications, twin screw for street use. I'm not really sure where this misinformation about centrifugals is coming from, but centris are not as powerful as an efficient twin screw, and I'm not sure why you would want an S/C in the first place if you are worried about controlling the power of your car. JMO though!
turbo for racing applications? why?
Turbos are the best solution (most efficiant) why would it be for racing only
Old 9/14/05, 12:38 AM
  #52  
V6 Member
 
Realdeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 14, 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im waiting for the Kenne Bell. Just got an e-mail from them saying it may still be a couple of months. Even though they have had articles about the 05 KB in all the magazines. Also saw this post
SVT Perfromance Hope its not much longer.
My son has a 1.7 KB kit on his 00GT (that I installed) and the low end torque is unreal. Every time I ride in it I know I gortta have one.
But the centrifugals and twin screws each have their positives and negatives just read up and decide what you like best.
Old 9/14/05, 08:32 PM
  #53  
GT Member
 
vppreacher's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 25, 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Realdeal,
I'd be interested in your opinion of each type of supercharger (screw and centrifugal) and their pros and cons. I have a year to decide.....
Old 9/15/05, 07:28 PM
  #54  
Bullitt Member
 
gt5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 14, 2004
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea we need more info, some people say centris are better for everyday use and others say tiwn screw are more reliable and less maintenance. i dont know to confusing.
Old 9/15/05, 07:36 PM
  #55  
Mach 1 Member
 
TURBO 05's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
think about how many cars are factory supercharged vs how many are factory turboed, turbos are the way to go for reliability and longevity (of coarse tuned correctly)
Old 9/15/05, 07:44 PM
  #56  
 
don_w's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by TURBO 05@September 15, 2005, 6:39 PM
think about how many cars are factory supercharged vs how many are factory turboed, turbos are the way to go for reliability and longevity (of coarse tuned correctly)
And also think about what kind of cars are factory TCed, and which ones are factory SCed. I got a V8, not a 4-cyl or 6-cyl sportcompact car... a supercharger is the only way to go for me.

I have no problem with you having a preference for turbos, but most of us don't share that preference. No matter how often you chime in on the "virtues" of turbos, it won't change my mind. I'd rather be blown...

Besides, I don't like the way a TC sounds... just my 2 cents.
Old 9/15/05, 09:05 PM
  #57  
V6 Member
 
Realdeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 14, 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It all depends on what you ultimate goals are. Here's two good articles from from MM&FF that compares all.Boost Bash Pt.1
Boost Bash Pt.2
Old 9/15/05, 09:46 PM
  #58  
Team Mustang Source
 
Redfire 05Gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 11, 2004
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by GOFISCH@August 16, 2005, 2:28 PM
I've emailed Saleen three times asking questions. ZERO response. Makes you go "hmmmm"
Same here but 4 different emails.
I ended up calling them...three times now...and spoke to someone each time.
Old 9/15/05, 10:58 PM
  #59  
Mach 1 Member
 
TURBO 05's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice article everyone should read it
Old 9/16/05, 03:32 PM
  #60  
Bullitt Member
 
gt5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 14, 2004
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea it was a good read but can someone sum it all up what did they think was better? Which one was better for everyday drivabilty or racing? I dont know alot about superchargers so thats why im asking.


Quick Reply: supercharger



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:16 PM.