GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Post your 05 timeslips.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1/13/05 | 04:10 PM
  #1  
2005MustangGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: January 8, 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Just curious to know how many 05's have been to the track so far.
What did you run?
Stock or not?
13.6 here at 101 - Flowmaster Mufflers
Old 1/13/05 | 06:24 PM
  #2  
Black Magic's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2004
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
13.83 @ 98.21 all stock-Automatic- 331 gears -etc. 1 mod- carbon trap out.
Old 1/13/05 | 06:35 PM
  #3  
2005MustangGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: January 8, 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
how does the auto feel? pretty firm shifts?
will it shift when you bump it into 2nd, or does it wait to shift until redline like the older models?
just wondering?
Old 1/13/05 | 07:31 PM
  #4  
169stang's Avatar
 
Joined: July 12, 2004
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
SCT Xcalibrator, underdrive pullies, HC trap out.
These were my first 2 runs ever, so I'm happy so far. Lots of wheel hop though.
Old 1/13/05 | 07:33 PM
  #5  
2005MustangGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: January 8, 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
169???
auto or manual?
Old 1/13/05 | 07:34 PM
  #6  
169stang's Avatar
 
Joined: July 12, 2004
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
Manual. Like I was saying, my wheels were spinning and hopping all the way into 3rd.
Old 1/13/05 | 07:35 PM
  #7  
2005MustangGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: January 8, 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
169 stang??????????????????
just noticed, that your time slips are from the future....
10:35 on Jan 13th???
are you Marty Mcfly??? LOL
1.21 jigawatts!!!!!!!!!
Old 1/13/05 | 07:37 PM
  #8  
169stang's Avatar
 
Joined: July 12, 2004
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
They were from last night. That's funny. Uh, Hello, McFly
Old 1/13/05 | 07:38 PM
  #9  
2005MustangGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: January 8, 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
what track was that from? I've ran at Gainesville a few times...use to live in Valdosta, GA.
----------
yeah, mine wheel hopped like crazy, or bogged off the line at first...took alot of getting use to, being a hydraulic clutch and 3-link rear suspension on a mustang
-felt like driving an older 6-speed camaro.
Old 1/13/05 | 07:40 PM
  #10  
169stang's Avatar
 
Joined: July 12, 2004
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
Moroso-West Palm Beach, FL
Old 1/13/05 | 09:24 PM
  #11  
Black Magic's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2004
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
2005, the auto feels good. The 1-3 shifts fly up to 6000 rpm and drop to 5000 rpm without a lot of slop. The problem and thus less MPH then the manual is the 3rd to 4th gear change. It drops from 6000 to 4000 RPM. That is hard to recover from. It starts dead out of the hole then picks up good from 330' to 1/8th mile. But when that 4th gear shift hits, it's dead. Any others with auto's out there that have been on the track?
Old 1/13/05 | 09:32 PM
  #12  
2005MustangGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: January 8, 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
i'm suprised the auto is going into 4th thru the qt w/ 3.31 gears.
thanks for the auto update....was wondering how they were this year.
Old 1/13/05 | 09:38 PM
  #13  
169stang's Avatar
 
Joined: July 12, 2004
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Black Magic@January 13, 2005, 9:27 PM
2005, the auto feels good. The 1-3 shifts fly up to 6000 rpm and drop to 5000 rpm without a lot of slop. The problem and thus less MPH then the manual is the 3rd to 4th gear change. It drops from 6000 to 4000 RPM. That is hard to recover from. It starts dead out of the hole then picks up good from 330' to 1/8th mile. But when that 4th gear shift hits, it's dead. Any others with auto's out there that have been on the track?
Sounds like a tune would take care of the shifting points.
Old 1/13/05 | 09:40 PM
  #14  
2005MustangGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: January 8, 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
yeah, might help
-glad i got the five speed
Old 1/14/05 | 07:27 PM
  #15  
RiverDiver's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 25, 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
I went to the track on Jan 10th and ran a 13.911 at 101.40,,completely stock, even the carbon trap was there. My R/T was really bad 1.067, think I can reduce it and get mid 13s on next run. Also removed the carbon trap and curious to see how much that will help.
Old 1/14/05 | 09:16 PM
  #16  
t69r00p69's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 1, 2004
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Your R/T has absolutely nothing to do with your E.T.
Old 1/14/05 | 09:20 PM
  #17  
169stang's Avatar
 
Joined: July 12, 2004
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
What exactly does E.T. stand for?
Old 1/14/05 | 10:02 PM
  #18  
05_John's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: January 5, 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Elapsed Time. Basically its how long it takes you to get to the 1/4 mile mark from the time you leave the starting line. As t69 said your reaction time has nothing to do with it. You could sit there for 5 seconds the timing mechanism will not start until you take off.
I will have timeslips as soon as spring hits and the tracks open
Old 1/14/05 | 10:02 PM
  #19  
BillP's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 11, 2004
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Elapsed Time. The timer doesn't START until you clear the staging lights. So you can have a BETTER ET than the guy in the other lane, and still lose the race. Imagine that the light goes green, and you do a 2-count before going. Your RT is going to be 2+ seconds, your ET could still be 13.6 or whatever.
Old 1/14/05 | 10:03 PM
  #20  
BillP's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 11, 2004
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
simultaneous post HAHA



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:35 PM.