new bbk TB is out
6/16/05, 12:07 PM
#41
I talk to cones.
Join Date: April 25, 2005
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 05mineralgrey@June 16, 2005, 12:50 PM
The stock throttle body is twin 55mm, right? So the new bbk would then be twin 62 mm, so you are actually paying 300 bucks for a 14mm increase, not just a 7mm increase.
The stock throttle body is twin 55mm, right? So the new bbk would then be twin 62 mm, so you are actually paying 300 bucks for a 14mm increase, not just a 7mm increase.
6/16/05, 12:42 PM
#42
Member
Join Date: May 15, 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by softbatch@June 16, 2005, 11:10 AM
There is a 21.306% difference in opening area from stock twin 55mm to BBK twin 62 mm.
There is a 21.306% difference in opening area from stock twin 55mm to BBK twin 62 mm.
6/16/05, 12:44 PM
#43
Join Date: July 12, 2004
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I spoke with BBK today. The trottle body's "should" be ready to ship in August. As I work for a manufacturer, I realize that release dates are very tentative on a new product. There are a number of hiccups you could encounter. Anyways, due to their distribution network they have, they can't do a direct sale to the end user. The good news is...I spoke with Brothers Performance Warehouse and the fella there said he was sure they could do something with a group buy. They don't have part numbers or pricing in their system yet. He is going to look into it and call me back. Once I hear from him with specifics, I'll post a new thread as a group buy to get the demand.
6/16/05, 12:49 PM
#44
Join Date: July 12, 2004
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are still doing some testing. The majority of the delay is in making their casting's to mass produce them as well as packaging/artwork.
6/16/05, 03:27 PM
#45
Bullitt Member
Join Date: February 7, 2005
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by softbatch@June 16, 2005, 11:10 AM
There is a 21.306% difference in opening area from stock twin 55mm to BBK twin 62 mm.
There is a 21.306% difference in opening area from stock twin 55mm to BBK twin 62 mm.
bbk open area = (pi x 62^2) x 2 = 24152.56 mm^2
bbk area/ current area = 1.271, aka 127.1% as much area = 27.1% increase in area
big diff from 21% at WOT i would think (at least a couple horses)
6/16/05, 03:40 PM
#46
Join Date: July 12, 2004
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I spoke with Brother's about the group buy. Brother's in some shape or form is part of BBK. Eric says that he couldn't get any pricing from BBK. BBK is unsure of pricing still. He also said that BBK didn't even have a part number for the throttle body. He says that BBK is working to have it ready for the SEMA show. BBK and Brother's is unsure what it is that RPM outlet is doing. RPM outlet has 600 of these on backorder. Eric told me to call back in Aug/Sept. and he will work with me on a group buy. I also spoke with Accufab. I sent them an email asking if they had one available for the 05. They simply said they don't. So...the wait is on.
6/16/05, 05:01 PM
#47
Team Mustang Source
Join Date: October 11, 2004
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by stkdidy@June 16, 2005, 1:30 PM
current open area= (pi x 55^2 ) x 2 = 19006.64 mm^2
bbk open area = (pi x 62^2) x 2 = 24152.56 mm^2
bbk area/ current area = 1.271, aka 127.1% as much area = 27.1% increase in area
big diff from 21% at WOT i would think (at least a couple horses)
current open area= (pi x 55^2 ) x 2 = 19006.64 mm^2
bbk open area = (pi x 62^2) x 2 = 24152.56 mm^2
bbk area/ current area = 1.271, aka 127.1% as much area = 27.1% increase in area
big diff from 21% at WOT i would think (at least a couple horses)
pi * (55/2)^2 * 2 = 4751.66 mm^2
pi * (62/2)^2 * 2 = 6038.14 mm^2
But that doesn't change the percentage...the cross-sectional area is still 27.1% larger!
The other math was incorrectly calculating 4751.66 / 6038.14 = .78694 which indicates that the 55mm is 21.306% smaller than the 62mm...
6/16/05, 06:18 PM
#49
I talk to cones.
Join Date: April 25, 2005
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Redfire 05Gt@June 16, 2005, 6:04 PM
The formula is actually Area = pi * radius^2 (radius is 1/2 diameter)
pi * (55/2)^2 * 2 = 4751.66 mm^2
pi * (62/2)^2 * 2 = 6038.14 mm^2
But that doesn't change the percentage...the cross-sectional area is still 27.1% larger!
The other math was incorrectly calculating 4751.66 / 6038.14 = .78694 which indicates that the 55mm is 21.306% smaller than the 62mm...
The formula is actually Area = pi * radius^2 (radius is 1/2 diameter)
pi * (55/2)^2 * 2 = 4751.66 mm^2
pi * (62/2)^2 * 2 = 6038.14 mm^2
But that doesn't change the percentage...the cross-sectional area is still 27.1% larger!
The other math was incorrectly calculating 4751.66 / 6038.14 = .78694 which indicates that the 55mm is 21.306% smaller than the 62mm...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post