Maximum HP gain w/o SC
8/1/07, 10:27 AM
#21
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: October 9, 2006
Location: It's tough in the jungle !
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
yep! they ran 3.0L in 2005 changed to 2.4L V8 for the 2006 season. F1 has a 2.2L ready to run but have a freeze on it for 2007-08 season due to production cost!....... obviously the point of my original post went over your head! Your to busy looking to pick posts apart! .........Jake-off!
8/1/07, 11:44 AM
#22
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: May 17, 2006
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yep! they ran 3.0L in 2005 changed to 2.4L V8 for the 2006 season. F1 has a 2.2L ready to run but have a freeze on it for 2007-08 season due to production cost!....... obviously the point of my original post went over your head! Your to busy looking to pick posts apart! .........Jake-off!
8/1/07, 12:00 PM
#23
Bullitt Member
Join Date: May 10, 2006
Location: NOVA
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They do the sniffer in the exhaust deal. In the old days when I was in the county I didn't have to go through inspection. That was a beautiful thing.
I thought that without a tune that the CAIs would make it throw a code because of the difference in air ratio with the sensor?
I thought that without a tune that the CAIs would make it throw a code because of the difference in air ratio with the sensor?
I just had my emissions done by the Ford dealer when they installed my 4.10's. I left the tune in and the CAI stayed. I believe with the cars we have they do it electronically w/o the sniffer. I had no problems.
8/1/07, 01:20 PM
#25
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: October 9, 2006
Location: It's tough in the jungle !
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
and where was the incorrect facts about F1 motors. I think that was clarified in the last post. I realize its hard for you to understand things from some previous posts. crayons and stick figures probably work best for you but that not a option here. Point being large HP gains can be reached with small liter motors in the naturally aspirated form but it is very cost prohibited!
8/1/07, 02:35 PM
#27
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: May 17, 2006
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your last post had nothing to do with your original point. And it made my original comment about you not having watched F1 recently even more valid. Your info was out of date, don't get butt hurt about my comments pointing out that fact.
WOW, HOW INSIGHTFUL!!! You must be like, uber-smart to come up with such an amazing theory in a post that has nothing to do with that subject. Not to mention you're wrong. It isn't a cost issue it is a problem of how practical a 19,000 rpm motor would be on the city streets. That horsepower is completly useless below a certain rpm.
8/1/07, 03:08 PM
#28
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: October 9, 2006
Location: It's tough in the jungle !
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Yeah, I'm the stupid one.
Your last post had nothing to do with your original point. And it made my original comment about you not having watched F1 recently even more valid. Your info was out of date, don't get butt hurt about my comments pointing out that fact.
WOW, HOW INSIGHTFUL!!! You must be like, uber-smart to come up with such an amazing theory in a post that has nothing to do with that subject. Not to mention you're wrong. It isn't a cost issue it is a problem of how practical a 19,000 rpm motor would be on the city streets. That horsepower is completly useless belew a certain rpm.
Your last post had nothing to do with your original point. And it made my original comment about you not having watched F1 recently even more valid. Your info was out of date, don't get butt hurt about my comments pointing out that fact.
WOW, HOW INSIGHTFUL!!! You must be like, uber-smart to come up with such an amazing theory in a post that has nothing to do with that subject. Not to mention you're wrong. It isn't a cost issue it is a problem of how practical a 19,000 rpm motor would be on the city streets. That horsepower is completly useless belew a certain rpm.
I rest my case, Ricky Bobby!....and I mean this with all due respect Your an idiot!....
8/20/07, 09:50 PM
#39
wow, so easy to get side tracked.
i am surprised at the results. so your all saying its that hard to get to 350hp without forced induction.
i would think with the aftermarket out there and the 4.6L abilities, it wouldnt be that hard.
oh and yea......
i am surprised at the results. so your all saying its that hard to get to 350hp without forced induction.
i would think with the aftermarket out there and the 4.6L abilities, it wouldnt be that hard.
oh and yea......
