GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

How do I determine when the rear end is square to the DS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9/17/07 | 08:22 AM
  #21  
SoundGuyDave's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 13, 2007
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MrClean
HB to RRLCA 3012 mm
HB to LRLCA 3009 mm
TOF to RRLCA 1702 mm
TOF to LRLCA 1700 mm

Consequently, as a reference I find the bolded measurements (harmonic balancer and tranny ouput flange to rear LCA bolts) are the ones that correlate with what I had to do to align the thrust angles....i.e. the engine and tranny sit slightly left-of-center in my car, and therefore I had to move the axle towards the drivers side to align all 3 points. At some point I may move the engine/tranny 12/32" towards the passenger side...if that's possible...
Here you go, Marc, I hope the upload works... What I'm seeing from your measurements is that your engine/trans is offset 4mm from centerline, which certainly isn't worth talking about, BUT, since the rear axle is apparently off by 10mm (12/32=3/8=10mm, roughly), there is some angular error in there somewhere. You did measure a 4mm variance in your wheelbase length, which may be part of it. Did you happen to measure FLCA to RLCA on either side, AND across? That could be instructive. Additionally, when you did the measurements, did you ballast the front seat, how much gas did you have in the tank, and did you have your "normal" load of junk in the trunk? As you know, weight changes in the rear will affect ride-height, which in turn will affect the left-to-right center of the pinion shaft. Also, measure the rear LCA length. When you put the car up on the ramps, did you jack it up or drive it up? If there was some bind from the ramp, it could be skewing your measurements. Last question: What would you consider your margin of error to be in your measurements?

About all I can see is measurement error, compounded by normal manufacturing variance yielding a slight angle in the engine/trans combo that over the length of the car is exaggerated by 6mm... Hardly earth shattering in the end, and doubtful the cause of any noise or vibration. That said, if you confirm that, for example, one of the LCAs is longer than the other, and you swap them side-for-side, that may just cure your angular issues...
Old 9/17/07 | 08:53 AM
  #22  
MrClean's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SoundGuyDave
Here you go, Marc, I hope the upload works... What I'm seeing from your measurements is that your engine/trans is offset 4mm from centerline, which certainly isn't worth talking about, BUT, since the rear axle is apparently off by 10mm (12/32=3/8=10mm, roughly), there is some angular error in there somewhere. You did measure a 4mm variance in your wheelbase length, which may be part of it. Did you happen to measure FLCA to RLCA on either side, AND across? That could be instructive. Additionally, when you did the measurements, did you ballast the front seat, how much gas did you have in the tank, and did you have your "normal" load of junk in the trunk? As you know, weight changes in the rear will affect ride-height, which in turn will affect the left-to-right center of the pinion shaft. Also, measure the rear LCA length. When you put the car up on the ramps, did you jack it up or drive it up? If there was some bind from the ramp, it could be skewing your measurements. Last question: What would you consider your margin of error to be in your measurements?

About all I can see is measurement error, compounded by normal manufacturing variance yielding a slight angle in the engine/trans combo that over the length of the car is exaggerated by 6mm... Hardly earth shattering in the end, and doubtful the cause of any noise or vibration. That said, if you confirm that, for example, one of the LCAs is longer than the other, and you swap them side-for-side, that may just cure your angular issues...
yes the engine tranny seems to be off centerline by ~4 mm, but also at a slight angle, whereby that becomes the 10 mm at the rear. In my post immediately above yours i reported that the hum is less and happens at at higher speed now...so I think there is some correlation of the hum to the thrust angle (any angle in that vertical plane would add to the true operating angle of the U-joints).
No I didn't measure FLCA to RRLCA and voce versa...I guess I should have. I did drive the car up on the fron ramps, then jacked the rear up by placing a floor jack under the pumpking to keep it loaded, and lowered it onto the rtear ramps, and I had slightly more than half a tank, but I didn't have any ballast on the drive's side. As far as measurement error, I had my wife under the car holding the tape measure up to the plumb line at one end while I did the same at the other, so I'd say +/- 1mm on the bolded measurements...the others I did by myself and may have more like +/- 2 or 3 mm...
Swapping the right and left LCA's huh? Interesting idea. I'll have to wait till next weekend to raise it again and measure the LCA's and do the cross measurements you suggest.
Old 9/17/07 | 11:08 PM
  #23  
SoundGuyDave's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 13, 2007
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MrClean
yes the engine tranny seems to be off centerline by ~4 mm, but also at a slight angle, whereby that becomes the 10 mm at the rear. In my post immediately above yours i reported that the hum is less and happens at at higher speed now...so I think there is some correlation of the hum to the thrust angle (any angle in that vertical plane would add to the true operating angle of the U-joints).
No I didn't measure FLCA to RRLCA and voce versa...I guess I should have. I did drive the car up on the fron ramps, then jacked the rear up by placing a floor jack under the pumpking to keep it loaded, and lowered it onto the rtear ramps, and I had slightly more than half a tank, but I didn't have any ballast on the drive's side. As far as measurement error, I had my wife under the car holding the tape measure up to the plumb line at one end while I did the same at the other, so I'd say +/- 1mm on the bolded measurements...the others I did by myself and may have more like +/- 2 or 3 mm...
Swapping the right and left LCA's huh? Interesting idea. I'll have to wait till next weekend to raise it again and measure the LCA's and do the cross measurements you suggest.
Sorry the upload didn't work! I would do the cross measurements and perimiter measurements just to ensure that your chassis is square, then work on locating the drivetrain components in that squared chassis.

X-------X
| \ / |
| \ / |
| \ / |
| \/ |
| /\ |
| / \ |
| / \ |
| / \ |
X-------X

The "X" marks would be FCA and RLCA mount bolt holes. Fill in side-to-side, front-to-back, and cross measurements, and that'll tell you how close to square your chassis is. THEN, you can plot the drivetrain component locations on that grid, and you'll be able to tell how much, and where, you're off-kilter. FWIW, I would closely scrutinize the LCAs. Granted, I have adjustable LCAs and UCA, but I have my wheelbase set to within 1/16", appx 1.5mm, within the margin of error for hand measurements. On a Hunter alingment rack, it was verified to be less than 1/16", with a thrust angle of 0.0*. I also have my rear axle completely centered fore-aft and side-side at 1/2 tank with 150lbs (yeah, I'm a stick) in the driver's seat. No drivetrain issues whatsoever with the Spydershaft.
Old 9/19/07 | 07:23 AM
  #24  
MrClean's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Dave,

Thanks again for your patience with this matter. I will do as you suggest. Do the engine and tranny have any room for play in the mounts? I guess what I'm asking is, if i take it to an alignment shop, and verify the chassis is fundamentally square, can the engine/tranny be moved over to be exactly in the center?

Hunter alignmenmt rack you say? I guess I need to find someone in Houston that has one...
Old 9/19/07 | 04:42 PM
  #25  
Anonimac's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 2, 2005
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Houston
I'm also looking for a place in Houston that will do a proper alignement...i've already swapped out springs for ultralites. This weekend i'm replacing shocks/struts with Tokico D-Specs, LCAs with J&Ms, and the panhard bar with an adjustable J&M one. If anyone can recommend a place in Houston to get the car properly aligned after all of that i would really appreciate it.
Old 9/19/07 | 06:29 PM
  #26  
SoundGuyDave's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 13, 2007
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MrClean
Dave,

Thanks again for your patience with this matter. I will do as you suggest. Do the engine and tranny have any room for play in the mounts? I guess what I'm asking is, if i take it to an alignment shop, and verify the chassis is fundamentally square, can the engine/tranny be moved over to be exactly in the center?

Hunter alignmenmt rack you say? I guess I need to find someone in Houston that has one...
Being 1300+ miles away, I can't help you with a local shop... Another thing to remember, is that I would ALWAYS take the final result of an old-timer with a spirit-level over a MORON with a computer. GIGO still applies. If one of the wheel clamps aren't installed properly, it can throw things off, and if the tech doesn't know enough to question the results of the reading, then your alignment will be off.

You might try what worked for me... Google local road-course racing clubs, and look for any shops that act as sponsors, and then look for shops listed as accredited tech inspectors. Those guys will know race cars, and alignment is CRITICAL for road-course cars... The owner of the shop I use races open-wheel, and just bought a used Craftsman Truck rolling chassis to play with...

THAT SAID, I think there is definately slop in the trans crossmember, and probably in the motor mounts. I would ensure the car is aligned and square before re-measuring your driveline. I would also start with the rear axle set to match the chassis, then work the driveline in from there.
Old 9/20/07 | 08:39 AM
  #27  
MrClean's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Good advice...thanks again.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fords4Ever
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
9
10/30/15 09:07 PM
seaclam
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
3
9/25/15 01:29 PM
1001yos
Ford Discussions
0
9/8/15 10:05 PM
robjh22
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
4
9/8/15 12:31 PM



Quick Reply: How do I determine when the rear end is square to the DS?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 AM.