Headers
2/28/05, 07:14 PM
#41
FR500 Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: September 18, 2004
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[quote=169stang,February 28, 2005, 6:12 PM]
Can someone please explain the sound and performance differences between the Long tube and shortys!
I am not sure there is much difference in sound, but the long tubes are the way to go for hp, if you live in a state where you can get away with them. If I wasn't in California, my car would have the long tubes for sure.
Can someone please explain the sound and performance differences between the Long tube and shortys!
I am not sure there is much difference in sound, but the long tubes are the way to go for hp, if you live in a state where you can get away with them. If I wasn't in California, my car would have the long tubes for sure.
2/28/05, 07:43 PM
#43
GT Member
Join Date: February 28, 2005
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The long tubes flow more air of course so there is a sound difference. I wish I could post a clip of my exhaust. I tell you what I will do. I am going to dyno it again Wed. I will take my camera and tape a couple of runs and then someone will have to post the clip for me.
2/28/05, 08:38 PM
#44
GT Member
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Location: Mission, TX
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, 3rwhp and -1rwtq...
I knew that on old 2v stangs shorties were a waste, but I hoped that on the new 3v they would perform better. No doubt that with a better flowing mid pipe the gains will be higher, but the shorties themselves seem like a dissapointment.
I knew that on old 2v stangs shorties were a waste, but I hoped that on the new 3v they would perform better. No doubt that with a better flowing mid pipe the gains will be higher, but the shorties themselves seem like a dissapointment.
2/28/05, 08:54 PM
#45
FR500 Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: September 18, 2004
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[quote=245/45ZR-17,February 28, 2005, 7:41 PM]
Wow, 3rwhp and -1rwtq...
I knew that on old 2v stangs shorties were a waste, but I hoped that on the new 3v they would perform better. No doubt that with a better flowing mid pipe the gains will be higher, but the shorties themselves seem like a dissapointment.
These were developed for the '05 3-V.
Paul
Wow, 3rwhp and -1rwtq...
I knew that on old 2v stangs shorties were a waste, but I hoped that on the new 3v they would perform better. No doubt that with a better flowing mid pipe the gains will be higher, but the shorties themselves seem like a dissapointment.
These were developed for the '05 3-V.
Paul
2/28/05, 08:55 PM
#46
Bullitt Member
Join Date: July 14, 2004
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[quote=wild stray,February 28, 2005, 9:57 PM]
Mine produced far more than yours....
Originally Posted by 245/45ZR-17,February 28, 2005, 7:41 PM
Wow, 3rwhp and -1rwtq...
I knew that on old 2v stangs shorties were a waste, but I hoped that on the new 3v they would perform better. No doubt that with a better flowing mid pipe the gains will be higher, but the shorties themselves seem like a dissapointment.
These were developed for the '05 3-V.
Paul
I knew that on old 2v stangs shorties were a waste, but I hoped that on the new 3v they would perform better. No doubt that with a better flowing mid pipe the gains will be higher, but the shorties themselves seem like a dissapointment.
These were developed for the '05 3-V.
Paul
Mine produced far more than yours....
2/28/05, 09:16 PM
#48
Bullitt Member
Join Date: July 14, 2004
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The SCT tune was done after the header install. They installed the headers and exhaust first on a bone dry stock car. They ran the dyno with just those installs (NO TUNE or any other mods). I picked up 8hp and 10.8tq, and .6sec on a 1/4. Those results were on my automatic on a mustangdyno which show limited results anyways.
After the tune I picked up a few more HP. It is all on www.ccstuning.com
After the tune I picked up a few more HP. It is all on www.ccstuning.com
2/28/05, 09:27 PM
#49
GT Member
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Location: Mission, TX
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
These were developed for the '05 3-V.
Paul
Paul
I was just saying that shorties on previous generation 4.6L Mustangs were a waste, and they seem to be the same for the '05...
2/28/05, 10:07 PM
#50
FR500 Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: September 18, 2004
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[quote=245/45ZR-17,February 28, 2005, 8:30 PM]
Of course they were...
I was just saying that shorties on previous generation 4.6L Mustangs were a waste, and they seem to be the same for the '05...
These were developed for the '05 3-V.
Paul
Paul
I was just saying that shorties on previous generation 4.6L Mustangs were a waste, and they seem to be the same for the '05...
2/28/05, 10:17 PM
#51
FR500 Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: September 18, 2004
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[quote=cdemot02,February 28, 2005, 8:19 PM]
The SCT tune was done after the header install. They installed the headers and exhaust first on a bone dry stock car. They ran the dyno with just those installs (NO TUNE or any other mods). I picked up 8hp and 10.8tq, and .6sec on a 1/4. Those results were on my automatic on a mustangdyno which show limited results anyways.
After the tune I picked up a few more HP. It is all on www.ccstuning.com
I was hoping for about those gains but a combination of things might have affected mine differently. Wish I could have the long tubes and 93 gas.
The SCT tune was done after the header install. They installed the headers and exhaust first on a bone dry stock car. They ran the dyno with just those installs (NO TUNE or any other mods). I picked up 8hp and 10.8tq, and .6sec on a 1/4. Those results were on my automatic on a mustangdyno which show limited results anyways.
After the tune I picked up a few more HP. It is all on www.ccstuning.com
I was hoping for about those gains but a combination of things might have affected mine differently. Wish I could have the long tubes and 93 gas.
3/1/05, 01:07 PM
#54
Cobra Member
Join Date: November 13, 2004
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The long tubes flow more air of course so there is a sound difference. I wish I could post a clip of my exhaust. I tell you what I will do. I am going to dyno it again Wed. I will take my camera and tape a couple of runs and then someone will have to post the clip for me.
-Bryan
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Antigini-GT/CS
2005-2009 Mustang
5
10/5/15 09:43 AM