GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Finally got my dyno info on brens 87 tune!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 07:36 PM
  #21  
RadBOSS's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 16, 2005
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
From: Central Coast, CA
Correction factor to account for air temperature, density so that the test data is corrected to what is called a standard day. There is an emperical formula for doing this. Applying a correction you are then able to make meaningful comparisons between different vehicles and set ups from even different locations, or the same vehicle tested in different locations (i.e. Houston, Denver, LA, etc.).
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 07:41 PM
  #22  
tifo's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: December 14, 2006
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: San Gabriel Valley, CA
Originally Posted by futuresvt
Ok, I admit I am a dyno dummy. Other than my understanding that Mustang dyno's spit out higher numbers and that the same car does better in colder temps, WTH are you guys talking about with corrected v. uncorrected?

Corrected for what?
With SAE smoothing on "0" the engine spikes (or peaks) as you can see in his graph become real choppy. During the spikes, the difference between the highest and lowest point is farther apart than when it's not smoothed out. If you move the SAE smoothing to 5, it will average those spikes and make the difference smaller so it's a more even line. The result is a more accurate picture of the horespower.

Here's an example of my "stock" base runs (manual trans). Notice how the lines are smoother and there is less spiking:
Attached Thumbnails Finally got my dyno info on brens 87 tune!!!-dyno.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 07:56 PM
  #23  
tifo's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: December 14, 2006
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: San Gabriel Valley, CA
Originally Posted by touring


Settle down there captain keyboard!

LOL!
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 09:03 PM
  #24  
karman's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2006
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 32
[quote=05-1947;849556]
Originally Posted by touring


Settle down there captain keyboard!

1st, I have not seen that many stock mustangs puting down 275hp and 290tq.

2nd, you are running the 87 octane tune ( which is "retarted" as you put it) so the gains are not going to be astronomical!

Have a beer a chill dude, install the 91 or 93 octane tune and have it re-dynod at a different dyno.
1st, check out my my little stock torque monster:
Attachment 20154
2nd, that's 87 octane dead stock SAE corrected 0 smoothing
Attached Thumbnails Finally got my dyno info on brens 87 tune!!!-stock-run.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 04:58 AM
  #25  
touring's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 14, 2006
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 1
[quote=05-1947;849556]
Originally Posted by touring




Have a beer a chill dude, install the 91 or 93 octane tune and have it re-dynod at a different dyno.
wish i could the next nearest dyno is about 2 hours away,what do i have to tell my local dude to do to smooth it out?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 07:29 AM
  #26  
karman's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2006
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 32
[quote=touring;850635]
Originally Posted by 05-1947

wish i could the next nearest dyno is about 2 hours away,what do i have to tell my local dude to do to smooth it out?
If you have the original Dynojet WinPEP 7 run file, it just needs to be loaded into the WinPEP 7 Program and the correction and smoothing can be changed properly.
http://www.dynojet.com/downloads/software.aspx
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 07:39 AM
  #27  
Pro Mod's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: February 9, 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
just have him e-mail you the dyno run file, and then download WinPep software from DynoJet's website. You can adjust the smoothing & correction factors there.

I'll bet though, even after that, you won't lose more than 3 hp. Your run being "uncorrected" isn't as bad as being "STD". I've been playing with my dyno runs on my WinPep software and there's only a 1.5 hp difference between "SAE" & "Uncorrected", and another 1.5 or so hp difference if I turned my smoothing down from "5" to "0". Now if I set it on "STD", it bumps me up about 5-6 hp alone right there.

Guys, touring's #'s aren't all that crazy. My best friend put down pretty much identical #'s (actually slightly higher tq) with the same mods & Brenspeed tune on a dyno @ SAE w/ smoothing @ 5.

THIS JUST SHOWS WHY WE DON'T RACE DYNOS
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #28  
karman's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2006
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 32
Originally Posted by Pro Mod
just have him e-mail you the dyno run file, and then download WinPep software from DynoJet's website. You can adjust the smoothing & correction factors there.

I'll bet though, even after that, you won't lose more than 3 hp. Your run being "uncorrected" isn't as bad as being "STD". I've been playing with my dyno runs on my WinPep software and there's only a 1.5 hp difference between "SAE" & "Uncorrected", and another 1.5 or so hp difference if I turned my smoothing down from "5" to "0". Now if I set it on "STD", it bumps me up about 5-6 hp alone right there.

Guys, touring's #'s aren't all that crazy. My best friend put down pretty much identical #'s (actually slightly higher tq) with the same mods & Brenspeed tune on a dyno @ SAE w/ smoothing @ 5.

THIS JUST SHOWS WHY WE DON'T RACE DYNOS
It also depends on the temp.
I ran on a cold day, with the garage cold (52F on the Dyno with even colder air coming in).
Cold air is great for making HP, but the SAE correction takes that into account also.
283HP SAE corrected was 298HP Uncorrected because of true cold air.
I actually was making 298HP, but if it was warmer in the garage I couldn't have done it.
Setting it to STD put it at 292HP.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 04:14 PM
  #29  
RadBOSS's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 16, 2005
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
From: Central Coast, CA
So corrected HP, 87 octane bonestock benchmarh looks to be 271 - 272 BHP?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carid
Vendor Showcase
2
Jul 8, 2016 08:53 AM
CoyotePremium13
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
10
Sep 23, 2015 06:45 PM
samjluck
5.0L GT Modifications
7
Sep 17, 2015 10:24 PM
earl610
GT
1
Sep 6, 2015 05:48 PM
JTB
Motorsports
1
Sep 3, 2015 10:50 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 PM.