GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Dyno pulls 87 canned and intake/bama tunes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2008 | 08:14 PM
  #1  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
Dyno pulls 87 canned and intake/bama tunes

Here are some dyno numbers before and after Bama Tunes and JLT. The first set of numbers I had an 87 canned tune. On the dyno pull with the intake/tune. I was using 91 octane. First run is with 87 per. tune, second run is 91 race tune, third and fourth is 91 tq tune. The race and tq tune are close through out the entire RPM range.
Attached Thumbnails Dyno pulls 87 canned and intake/bama tunes-dyno-numbers-87-canned-tune.jpg   Dyno pulls 87 canned and intake/bama tunes-dyno-after-bama-jlt.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 01:26 AM
  #2  
jaguarking11's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 15, 2008
Posts: 448
Likes: 1
From: NY
Mods list?

Man or Auto?

Nice numbers, I have a bama set of tunes as well, 87performance 93torque and 93performance.

I have only tried 93 performance so far, I love it.

Next up ill try the torque.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 01:57 AM
  #3  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
Here is a better view.
My car is a manual. Mod list is in my signature. It looks like there is not much difference between the tq and race tune, if you are going by numbers alone.
Attached Thumbnails Dyno pulls 87 canned and intake/bama tunes-dyno-numbers-87-canned-tune.jpg   Dyno pulls 87 canned and intake/bama tunes-dyno-after-bama-jlt.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 02:12 AM
  #4  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
Here is the 87 canned pull.
Attached Thumbnails Dyno pulls 87 canned and intake/bama tunes-dyno-pull-87-canned-tune.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 07:47 AM
  #5  
Glenn's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2006
Posts: 16,113
Likes: 789
From: In Boredom
great thread thanks for the info
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 03:26 PM
  #6  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
There doesn't seem to be too much difference in tq between the canned 87 tune and Doug's 91 tunes. 8LBS is not that much. I guess I was expecting a bigger difference.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 01:48 AM
  #7  
jaguarking11's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 15, 2008
Posts: 448
Likes: 1
From: NY
Im impressed.

With 91 octane tune your making close to 290hp to the wheels and over 300lb of torque. Sounds like a great outcome. I wonder what the 93octane tunes would do.

Very nice outcome. Doug rocks.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 08:02 AM
  #8  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
Actually it's close to 300 hp at the wheels and almost 310LBS of tq. According to Doug, there is no significant difference between the 91 and 93 tune maybe 1-2 hp.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 06:43 AM
  #9  
Tucker's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 19, 2005
Posts: 674
Likes: 1
Those are killer numbers for your mods.

Thanks for choosing JLT and Bama Chip
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 07:11 PM
  #10  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
I just realized that these are SAE numbers, which will read about 4-5% lower that STD corrected numbers.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redneb
2010-2014 Mustang
22
Aug 10, 2015 12:25 PM
Bullitt 3309
5.0L GT Modifications
5
Aug 2, 2015 10:20 PM
stewarts359
2010-2014 Mustang
5
Jul 31, 2015 08:46 PM
HMR-TYM
5.0L GT Modifications
19
Jul 31, 2015 10:39 AM
96MikeStang
SN95 Mustang
8
Jul 20, 2015 10:55 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 AM.