Comparing the new mustang..
#1
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: February 10, 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Comparing the new mustang..
Im looking for some reading material. Does anybody have any websites describing how the new 3valve motor compare to both the 2 valve and the 4valve. any help would be appreciated , thank you
#2
There's lots of info out there but basic physics tells us that with increased breathing abilty comes increase performance therefore, all other things being equal a three valve has greater potential than a two, a four valve engine better than a three. Looking at typical hp and torque data from the different types you will see this reflected.
#4
it can be done, the heads will bolt up but you then ave to get the nessary hardware, front cover, lower intake, upper intake, hoses, and so forth. Basically the same as doing a 2v to 4v swap. Can it be done, yes, easy, depends on your ability to look and solve a problem, and or pocket depth. I'd love to do a 4v swap, but a good port/clean up on 3v heads and they flow pretty dang good for anything I want.
Stock to stock 3v to 4v staying n/a yo umight see 40 ish rwhp, maybe. That just a ball park guess. But would cost 2k or so if you dont have anythig on hand already. NOt to mention new headers, tune, etc etc.
#5
it can be done, the heads will bolt up but you then ave to get the nessary hardware, front cover, lower intake, upper intake, hoses, and so forth. Basically the same as doing a 2v to 4v swap. Can it be done, yes, easy, depends on your ability to look and solve a problem, and or pocket depth. I'd love to do a 4v swap, but a good port/clean up on 3v heads and they flow pretty dang good for anything I want.
Stock to stock 3v to 4v staying n/a yo umight see 40 ish rwhp, maybe. That just a ball park guess. But would cost 2k or so if you dont have anythig on hand already. NOt to mention new headers, tune, etc etc.
Stock to stock 3v to 4v staying n/a yo umight see 40 ish rwhp, maybe. That just a ball park guess. But would cost 2k or so if you dont have anythig on hand already. NOt to mention new headers, tune, etc etc.
#6
Definitely not worth the expense, IMO. Our 3V heads flow VERY well. Although the 4Vs can flow more, you'd really have to be pushing the limits (over 500 HP) to see any benefit. For the little additional flow the 4Vs have, it comes at the expense of additional weight. For a street car you're not going to see a return on your investment.
#7
Cobra R Member
Join Date: April 22, 2005
Location: Lost Angels
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I read in one of the mags that the 3V heads flow just about as well as the 4V, if not better. It has something to do with the angle as well. Wish I could dig up that article...
in any case, I agree, it's NOT worth the exepnse. Put that dough towards a blower!
in any case, I agree, it's NOT worth the exepnse. Put that dough towards a blower!
#9
Legacy TMS Member
Join Date: January 9, 2005
Location: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Very good point. And to add facts to this statement. I owned a 1996 4V Cobra that came from the factory with 305 hp. Trust me these new Stangs with the 3V heads and 300 HP would out run that car hands down.
Scott
#10
Cobra Member
Join Date: February 18, 2007
Location: SE PA
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
+1 My '97 4V Cobra had 305 HP vs. the S197 with 300 HP. I'm sure the 4V had more potential, but I don't think the gains you would see would be anywhere near worth it.
#11
Shelby GT500 Member
Just curious, my last ride was a '97 Cobra vert and I honestly felt the two cars are about the same. I did put 3.73 gears in that car and let me tell you, it's exactly what the car wanted. Once they were in there, it was like a totally different car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CiniZter
General Vehicle Discussion/News
25
4/28/16 05:41 PM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
9/8/15 10:45 AM