GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

C&L Intake Manifold Coming Out- Winter 2008

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 11:48 AM
  #1  
mustangfan123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
C&L Intake Manifold Coming Out- Winter 2008

This winter, C&L Performance is finally coming out with their intake manifold for the 2005-2009 Mustang GT. Go to "cnlperformance.com" for details.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 12:03 PM
  #2  
Bullitt995's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2006
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
The manifolds are being sent out for testing in a few weeks.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 03:25 PM
  #3  
RRRoamer's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 27, 2004
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque, New Mexico
C&L has a GREAT writeup on this intake manifold at http://www.cnlperformance.com/05_3v.html. It is ALWAYS nice to see companies bringing products to market and actually explaining how and when it helps instead of just saying "40hp with a simple 10 minute bolt on!!!!". That definitely raises my opinion of C&L quite a bit. And my opinion wasn't low to begin with.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 04:59 PM
  #4  
The Reverend's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 28, 2006
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
I heard $799, cast instead of plastic, +24hp, +28tq. I haven't heard if it needs aftermarket fuel rails, the Steeda CMCV plates, etc.

Last edited by The Reverend; Nov 3, 2008 at 05:03 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #5  
06GT's Avatar
 
Joined: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 6
In for actual dyno results.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 05:38 PM
  #6  
tom281's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 8, 2005
Posts: 12,395
Likes: 29
From: Medina county, OH
It's been in the making for long enough....... hopefully it does not disappoint.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #7  
Bullitt995's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2006
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by The Reverend
I heard $799, cast instead of plastic, +24hp, +28tq. I haven't heard if it needs aftermarket fuel rails, the Steeda CMCV plates, etc.
It eliminates the CMCV plates all together. The runner is longer to make up the difference.

A MAJOR advantage to this intake is for people with ported heads. If you put a set of CMCV plates up to a Livernois ported head you can see that the runners on the delete plates are actually a good bit smaller and are a restriction on your nice new ported heads. The CMCV plates can also not be ported to fit. You CAN however port the C&L intake to match. So for built setups this manifold is going to gain some serious numbers.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 07:36 PM
  #8  
The Reverend's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 28, 2006
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
My delete plates are billet and are larger sized ports than the economy plates. I have considered Extrune Honed the heads. But once again I have budget restraints.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2008 | 08:16 AM
  #9  
Jon_Purdy's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 18, 2005
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tom281
It's been in the making for long enough....... hopefully it does not disappoint.
I'm with Tom. I'd like to stay N/A. If this manifold shows good numbers I'd like to try it along with a set of ported heads. Yeah, I may end up spending a little more than what I blower would cost but the cost would be spread out over time instead of 6K at one time. Still time to decide.

Jon
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2008 | 09:29 AM
  #10  
05fordgt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 19, 2004
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 2
From: Phoenixville, PA
Originally Posted by Jon_Purdy
I'm with Tom. I'd like to stay N/A. If this manifold shows good numbers I'd like to try it along with a set of ported heads. Yeah, I may end up spending a little more than what I blower would cost but the cost would be spread out over time instead of 6K at one time. Still time to decide.

Jon
Hey Jon, your not alone. I too am staying N/A, and this setup is VERY enticing!! Just gotta find out eventually, if it will fit under a strut tower brace. Mine is color matched to the car (blue with white stripes) and really stands out in the engine bay. if this is the same height, I'm good to go. knowing my luck, its probably not though.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2008 | 07:46 PM
  #11  
mustangfan123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
I am glad this was helpful. Also, FAST is not coming out with theirs, nor trickflow, as far as I know. Hm 799$ for 24hp(C&L manifold) vs. $699 for 30hp(intake/tune). I doubt the gains will be EVEN 24hp, depending on the mods the owner has installed prior. I am sure you would have to put it on a fully stock car to get those kind of gains.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 08:07 AM
  #12  
Jon_Purdy's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 18, 2005
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 05fordgt
Hey Jon, your not alone. I too am staying N/A, and this setup is VERY enticing!! Just gotta find out eventually, if it will fit under a strut tower brace. Mine is color matched to the car (blue with white stripes) and really stands out in the engine bay. if this is the same height, I'm good to go. knowing my luck, its probably not though.
All we can do is wait and see what sort of numbers it. What horsepower per dollar spent would you have to see in order for it to make sense?
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #13  
mustangfan123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
I checked, and it was 33$ per hp. But, I even stated earlier, if you have existing mods that lower airway restriction, gains will go down bigtime.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 10:17 AM
  #14  
SoundGuyDave's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 13, 2007
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mustangfan123
I am glad this was helpful. Also, FAST is not coming out with theirs, nor trickflow, as far as I know. Hm 799$ for 24hp(C&L manifold) vs. $699 for 30hp(intake/tune). I doubt the gains will be EVEN 24hp, depending on the mods the owner has installed prior. I am sure you would have to put it on a fully stock car to get those kind of gains.
Actually, I disagree, and I think you're looking at it the wrong way around... On a stock engine, there's no way the VE is high enough to completely tax the ability of the OE manifold to support airflow, so the benefit will be seen by the engine built up to increase VE. Also, the road to power begins with a tune, so it's not an either-or type of situation. I wouldn't doubt that some adjustments to the fuel and spark maps would need to be done with the new manifold, so you're probably looking at needing a tuner anyway. At that point, you might as well add on a CAI kit for good measure. The stock manifold does an outstanding job (which is why FAST and Trickflow aren't bothering to release) until you get the engine breathing quite a bit more than it does from the factory. It wouldn't surprise me to see little or no gain with this manifold until you've got cams, ported heads, and long-tubes on the car. At that point, you're kind of "maxed out" in terms of N/A stock long-block building, so the manifold may be the cherry on top...

Doing just the manifold would be kind of like sticking a tunnel-ram manifold on a stock 302 with a 2-barrel carb on top.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 12:59 PM
  #15  
RRRoamer's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 27, 2004
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque, New Mexico
It IS nice to see just how well these engines are designed!

Now if only Ford had use REAL connecting rods instead of the cracked powder metal rods!
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 03:14 PM
  #16  
Greywolf's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 4, 2004
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
one thing i think will help is a tune after because c&l said some cylinders were getting more air than other with the stock setup so with c&l you should theorecticaly be able to add more timing without pinging
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 04:23 PM
  #17  
SoundGuyDave's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 13, 2007
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Greywolf
one thing i think will help is a tune after because c&l said some cylinders were getting more air than other with the stock setup so with c&l you should theorecticaly be able to add more timing without pinging
It's more than that... With the C&L, the runner length and cross-section will have changed, which in turn will affect the VE of the engine overall, never mind specific cylinders... RPM and load dependent, the cylinders may wind up inhaling a larger air-charge than with the stock manifold, which in turn will require more fuel, and will require a different timing map to maintain drivability. None of this is a bad thing, but it's important to realize that most likely, this will not be a bolt-on HP increase. It will require the tune for support, much the same way that a good CAI kit will require a tune, if for no other reason than to correct the transfer function for the larger MAF sensor.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 04:23 PM
  #18  
GT5088's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 29, 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: smallest state in the union.
anything C&L comes out with is always good, as far as I have seen...
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2008 | 08:46 PM
  #19  
mustangfan123's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2006
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by SoundGuyDave
Actually, I disagree, and I think you're looking at it the wrong way around... On a stock engine, there's no way the VE is high enough to completely tax the ability of the OE manifold to support airflow, so the benefit will be seen by the engine built up to increase VE. Also, the road to power begins with a tune, so it's not an either-or type of situation. I wouldn't doubt that some adjustments to the fuel and spark maps would need to be done with the new manifold, so you're probably looking at needing a tuner anyway. At that point, you might as well add on a CAI kit for good measure. The stock manifold does an outstanding job (which is why FAST and Trickflow aren't bothering to release) until you get the engine breathing quite a bit more than it does from the factory. It wouldn't surprise me to see little or no gain with this manifold until you've got cams, ported heads, and long-tubes on the car. At that point, you're kind of "maxed out" in terms of N/A stock long-block building, so the manifold may be the cherry on top...

Doing just the manifold would be kind of like sticking a tunnel-ram manifold on a stock 302 with a 2-barrel carb on top.

Sounds very practical. I just thought the more mods you have installed to diminish air restriction, the less possible power from any future mods. For instance, if you install everything possible to open up the airways besides heads, and you then install them, the potential gain would be less, is my opinion.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 05:06 AM
  #20  
Cavero's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 13, 2006
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 150
I wonder what kind of gains you would see from NA with a CAI, this intake, and ported/polished heads. I'm very interested but have no idea how much this would cost
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:52 PM.