GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Boost and MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 08:10 AM
  #21  
max2000jp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Well I am going to datalog my STFT and see where they are at. I have a feeling that my car is running a bit rich, given that you guys are getting better mileage than I am. It’s winter here, so I have been babying the car and staying out of boost.

I wish I had my wideband fully functional right now. I’ll get to that next week when I have time off of work!
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 08:15 AM
  #22  
tom281's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 8, 2005
Posts: 12,395
Likes: 29
From: Medina county, OH
Hey Jason, just my personal experience talking now but I've found that my mileage (before the blower) varied ALOT between tuners. I'm going to make this statement and before any 'Bamaheads jump in here, let me clarify that I am NOT bashing Doug at Bamachips. BUT, when I ran his tune (about 2 years ago now) his tune got much worse mileage compared to the tune from Brenspeed. Both of these were canned tunes and they were both around 13/1 air-fuel on the same dyno, same day. They both had roughly the same power too if I recall correctly. Just FYI, that's all.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 08:20 AM
  #23  
max2000jp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by tom281
Hey Jason, just my personal experience talking now but I've found that my mileage (before the blower) varied ALOT between tuners. I'm going to make this statement and before any 'Bamaheads jump in here, let me clarify that I am NOT bashing Doug at Bamachips. BUT, when I ran his tune (about 2 years ago now) his tune got much worse mileage compared to the tune from Brenspeed. Both of these were canned tunes and they were both around 13/1 air-fuel on the same dyno, same day. They both had roughly the same power too if I recall correctly. Just FYI, that's all.
Tom,
I think I might pay Brent a visit in the spring. I will probably purchase some CMCV delete plates and have them install them too.

My current tune works very well and I am very happy with it (besides the MPG), but I'd like to compare different tunes.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 03:01 PM
  #24  
d_gusler's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: December 20, 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by max2000jp
It was dyno tuned. The car has an OR x pipe and Magnaflow mufflers.

I have a HO kit which made 10.08 lbs of boost.

Myself, I am running the following performance stuff:

Vortech S-trim at 11psi----3.48" pulley
Steeda CMDPs
FRPP 39lb injectors, Dual GT 500 fuelpumps, dual driver modules
Autolite HT0 plugs gapped at .032"
Comp Cams stage III with matching springs
Stock Bottom End
FRPP shorty headers, Mac O/R H pipe, Mac mufflers
XCAL II tuner(dyno tuned at pro dyno in charlotte, NC)
SPEC III clutch--Alum flywheel
Spydershaft
FRPP 4.10s, Mosier axles
Thats the highlights, as I'm sure i am forgetting some things as well.



Along with suspension, wheels/tires, and other stuff.

Looking at going meth injected this spring at 12-13psi(mayby).
Also plan on adding GT500 or V10 throttle body and switching to long tubes sometime soon(currently in the works).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NC14GT
Road Trips
43
Sep 10, 2017 04:47 PM
andy21996
Ecoboost
11
Nov 6, 2015 01:36 PM
09-gt/cs
GT Performance Mods
9
Oct 15, 2015 10:03 AM
unnoticedtrails
V6 Performance Mods
20
Aug 18, 2015 03:11 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:35 AM.