GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

for anyone who is considering 4.10s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11/9/06, 05:34 PM
  #1  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
official_style's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 17, 2005
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
for anyone who is considering 4.10s

it took me a real long time to finally decide to get them, i thought they were going to make the car annoying to drive in normal traffic, and make the rpms really high while cruising on the highway. well i was 100% wrong, the car is EASIER to drive in stop and go traffic, and you will barely notice any difference in rpms once your cruising in 5th, except you can pass w/o downshifting. my car hauls major *** now. this was one of the best mods i have done, and i have pretty much every bolt on possible. don't be skurred to go with 4.10s. forget 3.73s. i cant belive how much it has woken the car up!
Old 11/9/06, 06:51 PM
  #2  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Yup, they're a great choice.
Old 11/9/06, 07:05 PM
  #3  
Team Mustang Source
 
GRAYPNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 12, 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I love driving down a two lane highway and passing traffic without shifting gears. Just put your foot on the gas pedal and away you go.
Old 11/9/06, 07:09 PM
  #4  
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
SONICBOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Location: Temecula,CA
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by official_style
it took me a real long time to finally decide to get them, i thought they were going to make the car annoying to drive in normal traffic, and make the rpms really high while cruising on the highway. well i was 100% wrong, the car is EASIER to drive in stop and go traffic, and you will barely notice any difference in rpms once your cruising in 5th, except you can pass w/o downshifting. my car hauls major *** now. this was one of the best mods i have done, and i have pretty much every bolt on possible. don't be skurred to go with 4.10s. forget 3.73s. i cant belive how much it has woken the car up!
I am curious, what bolt-ons have you done that has given you 322rwhp
Old 11/9/06, 07:14 PM
  #5  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
official_style's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 17, 2005
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
intake, 93 sniper dyno tune, underdrive pulleys, alum driveshaft, american racing LT headers w/catted x, flowmaster mufflers. i think thats it, as far as performance
Old 11/9/06, 07:42 PM
  #6  
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
SONICBOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Location: Temecula,CA
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by official_style
intake, 93 sniper dyno tune, underdrive pulleys, alum driveshaft, american racing LT headers w/catted x, flowmaster mufflers. i think thats it, as far as performance
Nice,would that be like 400 at the crank. Also does an alum driveshaft just free up weight.
Old 11/9/06, 07:57 PM
  #7  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
official_style's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 17, 2005
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i definetly felt a difference when i slapped that in. less rotating weight!
Old 11/9/06, 08:12 PM
  #8  
Mach 1 Member
 
Error404's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 3, 2005
Location: Culver City
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
might be a bit off topic, but does anyone know if going from stock gears to 4.10's actually make the car faster in the 1/8 mile, or 1/4 mile, or 0-60? My car sure feels like it has alot more pep now, but I wonder if it's actually much quicker? I don't race or drag race, so I don't really know.
Old 11/10/06, 12:18 AM
  #9  
Cobra R Member
 
Rebel73's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 22, 2005
Location: Lost Angels
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2005sonicgt
Nice,would that be like 400 at the crank. Also does an alum driveshaft just free up weight.
322rwhp x 1.18 (18% parasitic loss) = 379.96 hp
Old 11/10/06, 08:09 AM
  #10  
Bullitt Member
 
LBJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Rebel73
322rwhp x 1.18 (18% parasitic loss) = 379.96 hp
Nope.... at 18% loss

322RWHP = 82% of X_HP (100% or engine HP)

(322/82)*100 = 393HP


Math check
393 * .18 = 70.74HP
393-71 = 322HP
Old 11/10/06, 09:20 AM
  #11  
Mach 1 Member
 
tw0scoops123's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 17, 2005
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by official_style
it took me a real long time to finally decide to get them, i thought they were going to make the car annoying to drive in normal traffic, and make the rpms really high while cruising on the highway. well i was 100% wrong, the car is EASIER to drive in stop and go traffic, and you will barely notice any difference in rpms once your cruising in 5th, except you can pass w/o downshifting. my car hauls major *** now. this was one of the best mods i have done, and i have pretty much every bolt on possible. don't be skurred to go with 4.10s. forget 3.73s. i cant belive how much it has woken the car up!

Why is it easier to drive in stop and go traffic?
Old 11/10/06, 09:35 AM
  #12  
Mach 1 Member
 
neil07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 25, 2006
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you look at some of his mods, he has lowered his parasitic loss by using a underdrive pulleys and an aluminum driveshaft. So would 18% parasitic loss be accurate? It seems his parasitic loss would be less.
Old 11/10/06, 09:44 AM
  #13  
Cobra R Member
 
traffic142's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 21, 2005
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what type of alumium drives shaft did you get?
Old 11/10/06, 04:06 PM
  #14  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by LBJay
Nope.... at 18% loss

322RWHP = 82% of X_HP (100% or engine HP)

(322/82)*100 = 393HP


Math check
393 * .18 = 70.74HP
393-71 = 322HP

Yep, that's correct. 322/.82=393 (rounded up)
Old 11/10/06, 06:21 PM
  #15  
Mach 1 Member
 
06GTwJUICE's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 25, 2006
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what was your rpm's at 50mph post 4.10 install?

I drive mostly freeway to work, albiet in traffic most of the time but on weekends i cruise relativly unhindered by it and drive through canyons as well.... not like a crazy man.
Old 11/10/06, 07:31 PM
  #16  
Legacy TMS Member
 
94tbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 10, 2004
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LBJay
Nope.... at 18% loss

322RWHP = 82% of X_HP (100% or engine HP)

(322/82)*100 = 393HP


Math check
393 * .18 = 70.74HP
393-71 = 322HP

nope


its a 15% loss for manuals give or take and a 20% for autos.

and it is 322x1.15 because 1.00 would be his current level because anything times 1 is the starting number .15 is 15% so 1.15 is the starting number plus 15 % in this case 322rwhp is 370.3 at the crank
Old 11/10/06, 08:09 PM
  #17  
Mach 1 Member
 
Error404's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 3, 2005
Location: Culver City
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 06GTwBOOST
what was your rpm's at 50mph post 4.10 install?

I drive mostly freeway to work, albiet in traffic most of the time but on weekends i cruise relativly unhindered by it and drive through canyons as well.... not like a crazy man.
I'm not quite sure what it is at 50mph, but at 60mph I'm at 2000rpm, at 80mph I'm at 3000rpm. I'd guess around 1500rpm for 50mph?

That's on an auto, not sure how different it will be on a stick
Old 11/10/06, 08:10 PM
  #18  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
official_style's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 17, 2005
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you can let the rpms get real low in stop and go traffic, and instead of having to downshift, now you can just gas it.

the speed is about 5mph lower in all gears.

i have the powerhouse alum driveshaft.

heres a spreadsheet that shows all the different rpms at different speeds
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/attach...2&d=1162519643
Old 11/10/06, 08:14 PM
  #19  
Legacy TMS Member
 
94tbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 10, 2004
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its not 5mph faster in all gears. 1st gear is about 5mph slower, second is about 9mph slower, third is about 14mph slower, and 5th is about 27mph slower. this is at 6000 rpm for all gears. reference the chart
Attached Files
File Type: xls
gears.xls (28.0 KB, 280 views)
Old 11/10/06, 08:19 PM
  #20  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
official_style's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 17, 2005
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ya it was a typo, i meant lower lol.


Quick Reply: for anyone who is considering 4.10s



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:23 AM.