GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

for anyone who is considering 4.10s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 05:34 PM
  #1  
official_style's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 17, 2005
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
for anyone who is considering 4.10s

it took me a real long time to finally decide to get them, i thought they were going to make the car annoying to drive in normal traffic, and make the rpms really high while cruising on the highway. well i was 100% wrong, the car is EASIER to drive in stop and go traffic, and you will barely notice any difference in rpms once your cruising in 5th, except you can pass w/o downshifting. my car hauls major *** now. this was one of the best mods i have done, and i have pretty much every bolt on possible. don't be skurred to go with 4.10s. forget 3.73s. i cant belive how much it has woken the car up!
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 06:51 PM
  #2  
tom281's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 8, 2005
Posts: 12,395
Likes: 29
From: Medina county, OH
Yup, they're a great choice.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 07:05 PM
  #3  
GRAYPNY's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: December 12, 2004
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 5
From: NorCal
I love driving down a two lane highway and passing traffic without shifting gears. Just put your foot on the gas pedal and away you go.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 07:09 PM
  #4  
SONICBOOST's Avatar
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2006
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 3
From: Temecula,CA
Originally Posted by official_style
it took me a real long time to finally decide to get them, i thought they were going to make the car annoying to drive in normal traffic, and make the rpms really high while cruising on the highway. well i was 100% wrong, the car is EASIER to drive in stop and go traffic, and you will barely notice any difference in rpms once your cruising in 5th, except you can pass w/o downshifting. my car hauls major *** now. this was one of the best mods i have done, and i have pretty much every bolt on possible. don't be skurred to go with 4.10s. forget 3.73s. i cant belive how much it has woken the car up!
I am curious, what bolt-ons have you done that has given you 322rwhp
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 07:14 PM
  #5  
official_style's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 17, 2005
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
intake, 93 sniper dyno tune, underdrive pulleys, alum driveshaft, american racing LT headers w/catted x, flowmaster mufflers. i think thats it, as far as performance
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 07:42 PM
  #6  
SONICBOOST's Avatar
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2006
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 3
From: Temecula,CA
Originally Posted by official_style
intake, 93 sniper dyno tune, underdrive pulleys, alum driveshaft, american racing LT headers w/catted x, flowmaster mufflers. i think thats it, as far as performance
Nice,would that be like 400 at the crank. Also does an alum driveshaft just free up weight.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 07:57 PM
  #7  
official_style's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 17, 2005
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
i definetly felt a difference when i slapped that in. less rotating weight!
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 08:12 PM
  #8  
Error404's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 3, 2005
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Culver City
might be a bit off topic, but does anyone know if going from stock gears to 4.10's actually make the car faster in the 1/8 mile, or 1/4 mile, or 0-60? My car sure feels like it has alot more pep now, but I wonder if it's actually much quicker? I don't race or drag race, so I don't really know.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 12:18 AM
  #9  
Rebel73's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2005
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Lost Angels
Originally Posted by 2005sonicgt
Nice,would that be like 400 at the crank. Also does an alum driveshaft just free up weight.
322rwhp x 1.18 (18% parasitic loss) = 379.96 hp
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 08:09 AM
  #10  
LBJay's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 437
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Rebel73
322rwhp x 1.18 (18% parasitic loss) = 379.96 hp
Nope.... at 18% loss

322RWHP = 82% of X_HP (100% or engine HP)

(322/82)*100 = 393HP


Math check
393 * .18 = 70.74HP
393-71 = 322HP
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 09:20 AM
  #11  
tw0scoops123's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 17, 2005
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by official_style
it took me a real long time to finally decide to get them, i thought they were going to make the car annoying to drive in normal traffic, and make the rpms really high while cruising on the highway. well i was 100% wrong, the car is EASIER to drive in stop and go traffic, and you will barely notice any difference in rpms once your cruising in 5th, except you can pass w/o downshifting. my car hauls major *** now. this was one of the best mods i have done, and i have pretty much every bolt on possible. don't be skurred to go with 4.10s. forget 3.73s. i cant belive how much it has woken the car up!

Why is it easier to drive in stop and go traffic?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 09:35 AM
  #12  
neil07gt's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 25, 2006
Posts: 668
Likes: 1
If you look at some of his mods, he has lowered his parasitic loss by using a underdrive pulleys and an aluminum driveshaft. So would 18% parasitic loss be accurate? It seems his parasitic loss would be less.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 09:44 AM
  #13  
traffic142's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: July 21, 2005
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
what type of alumium drives shaft did you get?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 04:06 PM
  #14  
tom281's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 8, 2005
Posts: 12,395
Likes: 29
From: Medina county, OH
Originally Posted by LBJay
Nope.... at 18% loss

322RWHP = 82% of X_HP (100% or engine HP)

(322/82)*100 = 393HP


Math check
393 * .18 = 70.74HP
393-71 = 322HP

Yep, that's correct. 322/.82=393 (rounded up)
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 06:21 PM
  #15  
06GTwJUICE's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 25, 2006
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
what was your rpm's at 50mph post 4.10 install?

I drive mostly freeway to work, albiet in traffic most of the time but on weekends i cruise relativly unhindered by it and drive through canyons as well.... not like a crazy man.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 07:31 PM
  #16  
94tbird's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: November 10, 2004
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by LBJay
Nope.... at 18% loss

322RWHP = 82% of X_HP (100% or engine HP)

(322/82)*100 = 393HP


Math check
393 * .18 = 70.74HP
393-71 = 322HP

nope


its a 15% loss for manuals give or take and a 20% for autos.

and it is 322x1.15 because 1.00 would be his current level because anything times 1 is the starting number .15 is 15% so 1.15 is the starting number plus 15 % in this case 322rwhp is 370.3 at the crank
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 08:09 PM
  #17  
Error404's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 3, 2005
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Culver City
Originally Posted by 06GTwBOOST
what was your rpm's at 50mph post 4.10 install?

I drive mostly freeway to work, albiet in traffic most of the time but on weekends i cruise relativly unhindered by it and drive through canyons as well.... not like a crazy man.
I'm not quite sure what it is at 50mph, but at 60mph I'm at 2000rpm, at 80mph I'm at 3000rpm. I'd guess around 1500rpm for 50mph?

That's on an auto, not sure how different it will be on a stick
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 08:10 PM
  #18  
official_style's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 17, 2005
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
you can let the rpms get real low in stop and go traffic, and instead of having to downshift, now you can just gas it.

the speed is about 5mph lower in all gears.

i have the powerhouse alum driveshaft.

heres a spreadsheet that shows all the different rpms at different speeds
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/attach...2&d=1162519643
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 08:14 PM
  #19  
94tbird's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: November 10, 2004
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
its not 5mph faster in all gears. 1st gear is about 5mph slower, second is about 9mph slower, third is about 14mph slower, and 5th is about 27mph slower. this is at 6000 rpm for all gears. reference the chart
Attached Files
File Type: xls
gears.xls (28.0 KB, 299 views)
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 08:19 PM
  #20  
official_style's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 17, 2005
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
ya it was a typo, i meant lower lol.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 AM.