GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

any 12 sec autos?

Old Feb 3, 2006 | 10:50 AM
  #1  
KungFuHamster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
if so, what are your mods? ive got a C&L cold air, a bassani o/r x pipe and axle back, 4.10 gears, a tci stall and some nittos and once i get some stuff sorted out, i plan to run at least a 12.8 or so. i dont think thats unrealistic.

so let me know what you auto guys are running and how fast so i can kinda get an idea where i stand. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 10:53 AM
  #2  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(KungFuHamster @ February 3, 2006, 9:53 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
if so, what are your mods? ive got a C&L cold air, a bassani o/r x pipe and axle back, 4.10 gears, a tci stall and some nittos and once i get some stuff sorted out, i plan to run at least a 12.8 or so. i dont think thats unrealistic.

so let me know what you auto guys are running and how fast so i can kinda get an idea where i stand. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]


Good luck to you!! [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]

You can also look in the Drag Racing subforum to see other results.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 10:54 AM
  #3  
dustindu4's Avatar
9 is not my lucky number.
 
Joined: March 12, 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 1
Fastest auto I have seen in person run was in the 11.70s
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 12:09 PM
  #4  
KungFuHamster's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dustindu4 @ February 3, 2006, 11:57 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Fastest auto I have seen in person run was in the 11.70s
[/b][/quote]
blazing saddles? yeah i saw his vid on modulardepot....sweet ride. and yeah i know hes running in the 12s NA....thats what im trying to see. what it took most people to get there.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 12:11 PM
  #5  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(KungFuHamster @ February 3, 2006, 11:12 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
blazing saddles? yeah i saw his vid on modulardepot....sweet ride. and yeah i know hes running in the 12s NA....thats what im trying to see. what it took most people to get there.
[/b][/quote]

I think I was a torque convertor short of getting to the 12's myself. Now we'll never know...
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 01:17 PM
  #6  
spyder7724's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
almost. hopefully now i'll be in the 12's solidly.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 01:26 PM
  #7  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
Ron, when will you get your first chance to get back on the track?
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #8  
dustindu4's Avatar
9 is not my lucky number.
 
Joined: March 12, 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 1
Don you need that HCI 3100 stall converter real bad. It will be interesting to see how long your differential holds up too. George has an Eaton and girdle on his. When I blow mine I'm getting the Detroit TruTrac.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 01:44 PM
  #9  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dustindu4 @ February 3, 2006, 12:43 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Don you need that HCI 3100 stall converter real bad. It will be interesting to see how long your differential holds up too. George has an Eaton and girdle on his. When I blow mine I'm getting the Detroit TruTrac.
[/b][/quote]

Aaahhh... the eternal pessimist. haha. Sure, parts will break... and if they go, they go... that's racing! And I'm treading slowy but surely on the TC issue. I only want to do it once, so I want to do it right. 3100 may be high for twin screw.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 01:53 PM
  #10  
Cleveland's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
hmmm....

JLT intake, 4:10 gears, relocated lower control arms and a less than perfect tine got me 13.1 @ 105 with NO TRACTION! on the stock tires. Mickey Thompson would have probably got me 12.7 - 12.8 before the Strange shocks and Long Tubes went in.

-Dan
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 02:08 PM
  #11  
TRQ QTRHRSE's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 15, 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
My Q when it was on its press tour at Steeda ran a 12.75 @ 107.83 mph naturally aspirated. STEEDA CAI, STEEDA Underdrive Pulleys, STEEDA Charge-Motion Plates, STEEDA SCT 93 Octane Tune, STEEDA/Borla Cat Back Exhaust, 4.10 rear gears and Detroit Locker differential.

Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 03:11 PM
  #12  
spyder7724's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
don
my next time out will be at bradenton in march. haven't run since november and a lot of work has been done so i sure hope everything goes well. it seems really strong on the street but i have 0 traction now that it has been tuned for the converter.
cleveland,
what kind of weather did you have on that run. that's was awesome! you must have one good tune and run in mineshaft weather. my best with just gears tune and d/shaft was 13.30@103 60' was 1.99
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 03:16 PM
  #13  
Cleveland's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
okay, my tune is far from ideal but the weather was nice that day, cool temperatures too.

-Dan
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #14  
acadian's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2004
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
Before I sold my G-timer, I had a 12.9 quarter mile run with the mods I have now.. minus the Bassani cats (I had the off-road Bassani X) and MMR heat shield. I know most don't trust timers, and obviously they aren't as accurate as the track. The HP ratings aren't too accurate on the G-Timer I admit, but the timer clock itself was almost dead on since I was getting 4.7 and 4.8 runs from 0-60 which is right where I should have been. Either way though, a 12 second n/a auto is very possible. And I don't think you necessarily need a tq converter either.

Don, have you used the G-Timer yet and compared it to your track times? I'd be curious to know if I do indeed have a 12 second car. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 05:06 PM
  #15  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(acadian @ February 3, 2006, 3:55 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>Don, have you used the G-Timer yet and compared it to your track times? I'd be curious to know if I do indeed have a 12 second car. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]

Yes, I used it at the 1/8-mi track one night, and on one run it was dead on (within 1/100 sec). On the other runs, it was usually within a 1/10 sec. I noticed that you pretty much have to hit the brake right at the finish line to be accurate (which is why the other runs were off). If you lift too soon or too late, it will skew the numbers. On the street, it is really difficult to know exactly when you've gone the correct distance. At the track, I had a hard time concentrating on the tree, while trying calibrate and stage simultaneously, so I haven't used it again.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 05:33 PM
  #17  
Stangers's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 8, 2005
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TRQ QTRHRSE @ February 3, 2006, 4:11 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
My Q when it was on its press tour at Steeda ran a 12.75 @ 107.83 mph naturally aspirated. STEEDA CAI, STEEDA Underdrive Pulleys, STEEDA Charge-Motion Plates, STEEDA SCT 93 Octane Tune, STEEDA/Borla Cat Back Exhaust, 4.10 rear gears and Detroit Locker differential.


[/b][/quote]


How tall of a rear tire are you running with that set up?
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 06:06 PM
  #18  
acadian's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2004
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(don_w @ February 3, 2006, 6:09 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Yes, I used it at the 1/8-mi track one night, and on one run it was dead on (within 1/100 sec). On the other runs, it was usually within a 1/10 sec. I noticed that you pretty much have to hit the brake right at the finish line to be accurate (which is why the other runs were off). If you lift too soon or too late, it will skew the numbers. On the street, it is really difficult to know exactly when you've gone the correct distance. At the track, I had a hard time concentrating on the tree, while trying calibrate and stage simultaneously, so I haven't used it again.
[/b][/quote]

Glad to see you are getting some use out of it. And it's good to know it's pretty accurate so I may be in the 12's now afterall. If not, the 4.10's will bring me there for sure.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2006 | 07:11 PM
  #19  
stkdidy's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 7, 2005
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(KungFuHamster @ February 3, 2006, 11:12 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
thats what im trying to see. what it took most people to get there.
[/b][/quote]

4.10s + intake/dyno tune + drag slicks = 12s

poo, i did it in my manual with pooty 255 street tires
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gigantor
2005-2009 Mustang
31
May 11, 2023 07:31 PM
GTPETE
Car Care
8
Oct 12, 2015 02:20 PM
Christopher Fox Wallace
Fox Mustangs
1
Sep 26, 2015 11:55 AM
lysingerjj
2010-2014 Mustang
11
Sep 9, 2015 07:56 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:12 AM.