MUSTANG VS CAMARO
9/18/04, 11:07 AM
#22
Cobra Member
Join Date: August 5, 2004
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by thezeppelin8@September 17, 2004, 8:34 PM
the fact that the gt weighed less, and that the iroc's 5.7 came as an auto only in 87, makes the fox the better car
the fact that the gt weighed less, and that the iroc's 5.7 came as an auto only in 87, makes the fox the better car
9/18/04, 12:17 PM
#23
Post *****
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally posted by MustangMan311@September 17, 2004, 6:47 PM
Ehh I'd have to go with the Camaro on this one. I don't like the 79 -88 Stangs much.
Ehh I'd have to go with the Camaro on this one. I don't like the 79 -88 Stangs much.
9/18/04, 01:14 PM
#24
Cobra Member
Join Date: August 5, 2004
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by future9er24+September 18, 2004, 12:20 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (future9er24 @ September 18, 2004, 12:20 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-MustangMan311@September 17, 2004, 6:47 PM
Ehh I'd have to go with the Camaro on this one. I don't like the 79 -88 Stangs much.
Ehh I'd have to go with the Camaro on this one. I don't like the 79 -88 Stangs much.
cause he likes changing his avatar everyday, yesterday he had a toyota avatar
9/18/04, 07:45 PM
#26
I'm people, and I like.
Join Date: March 13, 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 9,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
now this is a match up:
the Shinoda Cars!
1969 Mustang Boss 302 Vs. 1969 Camaro z/28
engine comparison:
Boss: 302 cid 4v V-8 290hp
z/28: 302 cid 4v V-8 290hp
from what i've heard, both cars are underrated!
both cars were made for trans am racing
the Shinoda Cars!
1969 Mustang Boss 302 Vs. 1969 Camaro z/28
engine comparison:
Boss: 302 cid 4v V-8 290hp
z/28: 302 cid 4v V-8 290hp
from what i've heard, both cars are underrated!
both cars were made for trans am racing
9/19/04, 10:23 PM
#29
I'm people, and I like.
Join Date: March 13, 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 9,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Dr Iven@September 19, 2004, 8:13 PM
I definitely like the look of the Boss better. It just looks like a solid piece of muscle.
How about this... RSX Type-S or 2004 Mustang V6?
I definitely like the look of the Boss better. It just looks like a solid piece of muscle.
How about this... RSX Type-S or 2004 Mustang V6?
9/23/04, 01:32 PM
#32
Cobra Member
Join Date: August 5, 2004
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by cntchds@September 22, 2004, 3:20 PM
i dont cre wut the other cars stats are im goin with the boss 429
i dont cre wut the other cars stats are im goin with the boss 429
9/25/04, 05:32 PM
#38
Cobra Member
Join Date: August 5, 2004
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Shibbiestang@September 23, 2004, 5:52 PM
Yenko was after market rt?...
Yenko was after market rt?...
9/25/04, 11:09 PM
#39
GT Member
Join Date: March 13, 2004
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by charles+September 25, 2004, 5:35 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (charles @ September 25, 2004, 5:35 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Shibbiestang@September 23, 2004, 5:52 PM
Yenko was after market rt?...
Yenko was after market rt?...
Yeah i remember reading that i knew it wasn't straight from chevy.... for a second i thought i was going crazie :crazy:
