MUSTANG VS CAMARO

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Sep 17, 2004 | 08:31 PM

#21

Lalo

I'm people, and I like.

Joined: March 13, 2004

Posts: 9,243

Likes: 0

From: PDX

the fact that the gt weighed less, and that the iroc's 5.7 came as an auto only in 87, makes the fox the better car

Sep 18, 2004 | 11:07 AM

#22

charles

Cobra Member

Joined: August 5, 2004

Posts: 1,221

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by thezeppelin8@September 17, 2004, 8:34 PM
the fact that the gt weighed less, and that the iroc's 5.7 came as an auto only in 87, makes the fox the better car

i would take the fox to

Sep 18, 2004 | 12:17 PM

#23

future9er24

Post *****

Joined: May 13, 2004

Posts: 18,616

Likes: 3

From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA

Quote:

Originally posted by MustangMan311@September 17, 2004, 6:47 PM
Ehh I'd have to go with the Camaro on this one. I don't like the 79 -88 Stangs much.

then why is there one on your avatar? :scratch:

Sep 18, 2004 | 01:14 PM

#24

charles

Cobra Member

Joined: August 5, 2004

Posts: 1,221

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by future9er24+September 18, 2004, 12:20 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (future9er24 @ September 18, 2004, 12:20 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-MustangMan311@September 17, 2004, 6:47 PM
Ehh I'd have to go with the Camaro on this one. I don't like the 79 -88 Stangs much.

then why is there one on your avatar? :scratch: [/b][/quote]
cause he likes changing his avatar everyday, yesterday he had a toyota avatar

Sep 18, 2004 | 03:26 PM

#25

Lalo

I'm people, and I like.

Joined: March 13, 2004

Posts: 9,243

Likes: 0

From: PDX

havent seen a camaro avatar from him yet though

Sep 18, 2004 | 07:45 PM

#26

Lalo

I'm people, and I like.

Joined: March 13, 2004

Posts: 9,243

Likes: 0

From: PDX

now this is a match up:

the Shinoda Cars!

1969 Mustang Boss 302 Vs. 1969 Camaro z/28

engine comparison:
Boss: 302 cid 4v V-8 290hp
z/28: 302 cid 4v V-8 290hp

from what i've heard, both cars are underrated!

both cars were made for trans am racing

Sep 18, 2004 | 07:53 PM

#27

MustangMan311

Shelby GT350 Member

Joined: February 19, 2004

Posts: 2,328

Likes: 2

302 all the way!!!! And no, you will NEVER see a Camaro avatar.

Sep 19, 2004 | 09:10 PM

#28

Dr Iven

Cobra Member

Joined: January 31, 2004

Posts: 1,261

Likes: 0

I definitely like the look of the Boss better. It just looks like a solid piece of muscle.

How about this... RSX Type-S or 2004 Mustang V6?

Sep 19, 2004 | 10:23 PM

#29

Lalo

I'm people, and I like.

Joined: March 13, 2004

Posts: 9,243

Likes: 0

From: PDX

Quote:

Originally posted by Dr Iven@September 19, 2004, 8:13 PM
I definitely like the look of the Boss better. It just looks like a solid piece of muscle.

How about this... RSX Type-S or 2004 Mustang V6?

Sep 22, 2004 | 02:13 PM

#30

Lalo

I'm people, and I like.

Joined: March 13, 2004

Posts: 9,243

Likes: 0

From: PDX

1969 mustang boss 429
429cid 4V V8 376hp

VERSUS

1969 Camaro Yenko 427
427cid 4V V8 430hp

Sep 22, 2004 | 03:17 PM

#31

cntchds

I had Arin naked in my back seat

Joined: August 23, 2004

Posts: 3,599

Likes: 3

From: Bay Area, California

i dont cre wut the other cars stats are im goin with the boss 429

Sep 23, 2004 | 01:32 PM

#32

charles

Cobra Member

Joined: August 5, 2004

Posts: 1,221

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by cntchds@September 22, 2004, 3:20 PM
i dont cre wut the other cars stats are im goin with the boss 429

people always say that a 428 cobra jet with dragpack is faster than a 429 but i dont know

Sep 23, 2004 | 05:49 PM

#33

Shibbiestang

GT Member

Joined: March 13, 2004

Posts: 166

Likes: 0

Yenko was after market rt?...

Sep 23, 2004 | 05:50 PM

#34

Shibbiestang

GT Member

Joined: March 13, 2004

Posts: 166

Likes: 0

OH BUT ANYWAY I AM GOING WITH THE BOSS ALL THE WAY!

Sep 23, 2004 | 09:32 PM

#35

Lalo

I'm people, and I like.

Joined: March 13, 2004

Posts: 9,243

Likes: 0

From: PDX

i dont think it was. they had the copo engine which was one of the many engine choices

Sep 24, 2004 | 05:06 PM

#36

cntchds

I had Arin naked in my back seat

Joined: August 23, 2004

Posts: 3,599

Likes: 3

From: Bay Area, California

with wut i have seen (just on the web not a strip) the stats for the mach 1 was better dont know why tho... maybe there is one car

Sep 25, 2004 | 05:24 PM

#37

Galaxie

I Have Admin Envy

Joined: January 30, 2004

Posts: 6,740

Likes: 1

Those are both phenomenal cars, I wish I could have either one.

Sep 25, 2004 | 05:32 PM

#38

charles

Cobra Member

Joined: August 5, 2004

Posts: 1,221

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by Shibbiestang@September 23, 2004, 5:52 PM
Yenko was after market rt?...

Sep 25, 2004 | 11:09 PM

#39

Shibbiestang

GT Member

Joined: March 13, 2004

Posts: 166

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by charles+September 25, 2004, 5:35 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (charles @ September 25, 2004, 5:35 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Shibbiestang@September 23, 2004, 5:52 PM
Yenko was after market rt?...

yenko was a dealership in pennsalvania that used their dragracing team as advertisment then sold detuned racecars to the public. several dealers did this during the 60s and 70s their was also a ford dealer ship called Tasca ford in rhode island [/b][/quote]
Yeah i remember reading that i knew it wasn't straight from chevy.... for a second i thought i was going crazie :crazy:

Sep 26, 2004 | 03:17 AM

#40

The Deviant One

Mach 1 Member

Joined: September 7, 2004

Posts: 850

Likes: 0

As much as I like the Boss 429 (which I'm sure it would probably kill the Yenko in a real street race) I'd still go for the Yenko, cuz it is better to drive on an average day.

Reply Share

First
Prev
2 / 3
Next
Last