Which Engine is Better?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 15, 2006 | 12:01 PM

#41

Boomer

I Have No Life

Joined: January 30, 2004

Posts: 10,446

Likes: 12

From: Canada

Argument could go a bunch of ways....

Tune the 05 3v with a 91 octane tune... more power than stock...
05 engine is newer with more technology...
Put those on the DOHC 32v and you'll have more

Also, what would/could happen if you place the 4v engine in a stock 05 body and run the 2 against each other.
Could be a very interesting outcome [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img]

Feb 20, 2006 | 07:58 PM

#42

softbatch

I talk to cones.

Joined: April 25, 2005

Posts: 878

Likes: 0

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Boomer @ February 15, 2006, 1:04 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Argument could go a bunch of ways....

Tune the 05 3v with a 91 octane tune... more power than stock...
05 engine is newer with more technology...
Put those on the DOHC 32v and you'll have more

Also, what would/could happen if you place the 4v engine in a stock 05 body and run the 2 against each other.
Could be a very interesting outcome [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]

Stock with Both tuned to 93 I think it is a toss up, but the Mach has more power potential.