Which is Better All Car vs. Car Topics

2008 Nissa GT-R vs. ANY extreme Mustang...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11/16/07, 04:34 PM
  #21  
Team Mustang Source
 
jsaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,357
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Knight
weight is a big one too as well is aerodynamics.
Weight likely has a good bit less to do with higway mileage than do the other factors. Once a car is actually moving it takes very little in the way of hp to maintain that forward motion so this seems unlikely to be a major player. GM's deft use of a very tall overdrive behind engines with the torque to effectively utilize them is a very big factor. In fact, this one is so simple you wonder how and/or why everybody (ie: Ford) isn't doing it?
Old 11/16/07, 07:54 PM
  #22  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
weight would be a big factor in city mpg and aerodynamics are important for hwy mpg.
Old 11/16/07, 08:04 PM
  #23  
Team Mustang Source
 
jsaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,357
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Knight
Aaerodynamics are important for hwy mpg.
Obviously

weight would be a big factor in city mpg
People don't seem as concerned with city mpg for this kind of car focusing instead on hwy numbers.
Old 11/17/07, 03:45 AM
  #24  
Closet American
 
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
GT-R couldn't touch the Ford GT. Sorry.

Ford GT is a full-on, *****-to-the-wall supercar.
Old 11/17/07, 09:05 AM
  #25  
Mach 1 Member
 
tacbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 22, 2005
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
How about the new Saleen H302SC:


580 HP, Watts Link Suspension

$70,000+
Old 11/18/07, 01:25 AM
  #26  
FR500 Member
 
hi5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 15, 2005
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't think the Saleen can match the GT-R's track-worthiness. As much as I hate to say it, IMO it is a tall order to build a tuned Mustang that will match the GT-R in all ride/handling/performance aspects for the same price, although that would be interesting to see some proposals or have someone try...
Old 11/18/07, 07:51 PM
  #27  
Cobra Member
 
ScottyBoy302's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 20, 2005
Location: BC
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jsaylor
People don't seem as concerned with city mpg for this kind of car focusing instead on hwy numbers.

Cause the hwy mpg is good... city is not. Ive gotten 30hwy in my car, always around 15-16 in the city. Im sure the Z06 gets city mileage at least that bad, if not worse, while still pulling 30+ highway.
Old 11/19/07, 05:09 AM
  #28  
Cobra R Member
 
Cheese302's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 25, 2004
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
honestly, for half the price of a ford gt, the the GTR is not a bad buy. your losing 100hp, but then again, get a computer program, and you'll be as high if not higher. i bet the stock internals on the gtr can handle 700-800 no worries.
Old 11/19/07, 08:48 AM
  #29  
Mach 1 Member
 
tacbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 22, 2005
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Cheese302
honestly, for half the price of a ford gt, the the GTR is not a bad buy. your losing 100hp, but then again, get a computer program, and you'll be as high if not higher. i bet the stock internals on the gtr can handle 700-800 no worries.

Supposedly the engineers built the PCM so it can't be tampered with
Old 11/19/07, 09:35 AM
  #30  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by tacbear
Supposedly the engineers built the PCM so it can't be tampered with
would be smart for nissian since these are going to get modded to heck and then people will blow them and come back for warrenty work.


of course i wouldn't want it that way but the company would want to protect itself from extra costs.
Old 11/19/07, 06:57 PM
  #31  
Cobra Member
 
ScottyBoy302's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 20, 2005
Location: BC
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Knight
would be smart for nissian since these are going to get modded to heck and then people will blow them and come back for warrenty work.


of course i wouldn't want it that way but the company would want to protect itself from extra costs.
Why not just do the usual thing and void the warranty if any mods are made? then everyones happy. And if they can lock it up so people cant mess with it im sure it would be just as easy for them to create some kind of 'black box' that would record any tampering so people couldnt just return it to stock and go back for warranty work.
Old 11/20/07, 09:38 AM
  #32  
Cobra R Member
 
Cheese302's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 25, 2004
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what ever tamper proofing is done, people will get around it. piggy-backing, stand alone. heck aem built a standalone computer for the s2000 that just plugs into the factory wiring harness. and besides i am sure there will be plenty of nismo goodies as well.
Old 11/20/07, 02:11 PM
  #33  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
this is true, everytime a manufacture says somthing like this it never really happens.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
duppycat
General Mustang Chat
2
2/16/19 08:36 AM
GrabberBlue310
2012-2013 BOSS 302
6
9/17/15 08:21 AM
M3hunter
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
5
9/10/15 09:26 AM



Quick Reply: 2008 Nissa GT-R vs. ANY extreme Mustang...



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:06 AM.