Which is Better All Car vs. Car Topics

05 v6 vs 03 4x4 silverado

Old Dec 13, 2004 | 03:19 PM
  #1  
k-dubb's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 25, 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
There is a guy on my local forum who says he beat an 05 v6 (automatic obviously, since the manuals arent out yet) from only 60-95 by 4-5 car lengths in his 03 4x4 silverado z71 RC with exhaust i think. I told him the guy obviously wasnt racing, but he is taking that as me calling him a liar, and now we are in an argument about it. What do you guys think?
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 03:35 PM
  #2  
Shea's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 24, 2004
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
I think it's a dumb argument. Who cares?

BTW, my dad's Suburban w/ 454 will beat any stock V6, hands down. Hehe, sounds like the old, "my dad can beat up yours."
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 03:38 PM
  #3  
Altoid's Avatar
Jackass
 
Joined: August 24, 2004
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Take everything with a gain of salt. Also, I agree, who cares. They are both built for different reasons.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 03:43 PM
  #4  
SixtySix's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
it's more like who cares? I think he's reaching looking for acceptance that he beat a stock V6 Mustang in a 4x4 Truck with a 305 V8 (or is the Z71 a 350).

That's like comparing Apples and Cumquats.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 03:57 PM
  #5  
k-dubb's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 25, 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
yea well this guy just insists on him winning by that much...60 punches are stupid anyway.

But to say 4-5 lengths in a 4800+ lb brick with 300/315 vs a 3300 lb car with 210/240 is quite rediculous..and from just 60-95 no less! That truck should be pretty close to the 05 gts huh, lol...

edit: i know this is not a good comparison, but that isnt the point, the point is the guy obviously is lying or the guy he is talking about racing...wasnt...or wasnt the whole time.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 04:11 PM
  #6  
jgsmuzzy's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: May 27, 2004
Posts: 4,749
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, England
you just answered your own question....... 30% more weight, 30% more power............
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 05:17 PM
  #7  
DirtyDave's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: June 19, 2004
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Originally posted by SixtySix@December 13, 2004, 4:46 PM
it's more like who cares? I think he's reaching looking for acceptance that he beat a stock V6 Mustang in a 4x4 Truck with a 305 V8 (or is the Z71 a 350).

That's like comparing Apples and Cumquats.
The Chevy Z71's have a 5.3 Litre or 327 in them.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 05:25 PM
  #8  
crazyhorse's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
my '98 Z71 has a 350. Once you get the weight rolling, it is pretty fast. He may not be BSing. From a dead stop would be a different story.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 05:36 PM
  #9  
k-dubb's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 25, 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
well according to ls1 tech, the 03's (5.3) 4x4s are only trapping around 85-86 in the 1/4, which is like a 99-04 v6..the few 05 v6s that i have heard about running were trapping around 90 with just a few 100 miles on them.

So IF this were true, it would mean that the 05s are trapping under 80mph for a truck (flying brick) to pull that hard in such a short distance. Heck even the pre 99s trap at at least 80.

It would take a big power/weight difference to pull 4-5 lengths from just 60-95 if they both punched at the same time...like he said they did.

I already know that it is bs from all the facts. I just wanted to post so i could show him this page so he could see what other people say that know their stuff.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 05:55 PM
  #10  
holderca1's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2004
Posts: 3,657
Likes: 2
From: San Antonio, TX
Accelerating from 60-95 is completely different than 0-60.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 06:09 PM
  #11  
k-dubb's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 25, 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Originally posted by holderca1@December 13, 2004, 6:58 PM
Accelerating from 60-95 is completely different than 0-60.
no kidding! The silverado might actually be in front for a little bit if they did it from a stop (with him launching in 4x4 lol), but rolling mass is a different story...pulling 4-5 car at a higher speed is a pretty significant power difference.

Now if it was v6 vs gt, i can see where the 4-5 lengths in just 35 mph of leeway could come from...
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 06:40 PM
  #12  
GTJeff's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 26, 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Ask him if he would like to take a shot at a GT ...
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 06:44 PM
  #13  
WBstangGT's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2004
Posts: 703
Likes: 1
yeah, v8 vs. v8, come on tough guy
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2004 | 06:50 PM
  #14  
k-dubb's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 25, 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
he has an 11 second terminator..which is another reason he thinks he thinks he knows it all since the general consensus is that v6 mustang=slow, which is true comapred to cars like that..but not compared to a 4x4 brick. 4-5 lengths just doesnt add up. He didnt even know that the new ones had the 4.0 5 speed auto. I bet an 01+ ranger 4.0 5 speed auto would give him a good run...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JCStang
2010-2014 Mustang
6
Aug 1, 2015 05:50 AM
Zastava_101
General Vehicle Discussion/News
16
Sep 20, 2007 11:38 AM
Zastava_101
General Vehicle Discussion/News
1
Dec 19, 2006 10:10 AM
Galaxie
General Vehicle Discussion/News
5
Jun 13, 2006 08:54 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:09 AM.