VT wants to impeach Bush
Thread Starter
Shelby GT500 Member




Joined: April 13, 2006
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: McAllen, Texas
VT wants to impeach Bush
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/20...nt_6006599.htm
WASHINGTON, April 20 (Xinhua) -- The Senate of Vermont, a state in northeast United States, passed a resolution Friday that called on the U.S. Congress to impeach President George W. Bush and Vice President **** Cheney over the Iraq war.
The symbolic measure, passed by a vote of 16-8, called on members of Congress from the state to introduce a resolution that would require the House Judiciary Committee to start impeachment proceedings against Bush and Cheney, media reports said. The resolution said Bush and Cheney's actions in the United States and abroad, including in Iraq, "raise serious questions of constitutionality, statutory legality, and abuse of the public trust."
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satelli...cle%2FShowFull
Vermont state senators voted to call for the impeachment of President George W. Bush and Vice President **** Cheney, saying their actions in Iraq and the US "raise serious questions of constitutionality."
The symbolic measure, passed by a vote of 16-8, called on members of Congress from the state to introduce a resolution that would require the House Judiciary Committee to start impeachment proceedings against Bush and Cheney, media reports said. The resolution said Bush and Cheney's actions in the United States and abroad, including in Iraq, "raise serious questions of constitutionality, statutory legality, and abuse of the public trust."
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satelli...cle%2FShowFull
Vermont state senators voted to call for the impeachment of President George W. Bush and Vice President **** Cheney, saying their actions in Iraq and the US "raise serious questions of constitutionality."
I've heared that about people from Vermont...but I do like how only 24 people voted on it...HAA!
Indiana has a whopping 50.
(VT is like our funny uncle, it looks like us but we don't talk to about it much.)
Now if only the US congress would do this. Seems to me to be a pretty big double standards issue when Clinton was impeached for his sexual activities and lying about them, where as this administration has scandals like the Scooter Libby issue and nothing happens.
Having a government that is accountable for it's actions no matter the political alignment is quite important for the well being of the country.
Having a government that is accountable for it's actions no matter the political alignment is quite important for the well being of the country.
Thank Bob for this article. I've always wondered where Vermont was.
Kidding aside, I think it's great that people in the government are finally standing up and doing something. Impeaching him really won't do anything. But if Clinton got impeached for lying about a BJ, I just have to ask why Bush hasn't been impeached already.
I could go on, but I hate these kind of posts because they turn into a conservative vs liberal debate and nothing gets accomplished. I'll just state my opinion. I, for one, am glad.
/end
Kidding aside, I think it's great that people in the government are finally standing up and doing something. Impeaching him really won't do anything. But if Clinton got impeached for lying about a BJ, I just have to ask why Bush hasn't been impeached already.
I could go on, but I hate these kind of posts because they turn into a conservative vs liberal debate and nothing gets accomplished. I'll just state my opinion. I, for one, am glad.
/end
i used to wish texas would seceed from the union and become its own country i`d go there in a minute .. but not now .. not if the bushes are going to be there .. texas has everything it needs to be a seperate nation ..and probably could easily take over the rest of south america
Believe what you want, WMDs were there. CIA said it. Britain said it. Russia said it.
Obvious Bush hater and I'm not going to get pulled into your blindly rehash of moveon.orgs argument.
And I'll reiterate...slight difference of knowingly lying under oath and have bad intel from reputable sources and acting on it.
Obvious Bush hater and I'm not going to get pulled into your blindly rehash of moveon.orgs argument.
And I'll reiterate...slight difference of knowingly lying under oath and have bad intel from reputable sources and acting on it.
Believe what you want, WMDs were there. CIA said it. Britain said it. Russia said it.
Obvious Bush hater and I'm not going to get pulled into your blindly rehash of moveon.orgs argument.
And I'll reiterate...slight difference of knowingly lying under oath and have bad intel from reputable sources and acting on it.
Obvious Bush hater and I'm not going to get pulled into your blindly rehash of moveon.orgs argument.
And I'll reiterate...slight difference of knowingly lying under oath and have bad intel from reputable sources and acting on it.
Those 3,000 lives over 4 years have saved how many Americans? We lost that many civilians in one day, remember? How many more would be lost if we left terrorist and terrorist states unchecked?
I suppose WWII was a failure too? We lost how many soldiers in those 4 years?
There's plenty of evidence to the contrary about what the CIA knew. Even Clinton said Iraq had WMD in development during his tenure. Get off the party line and do some honest research.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 16, 2015 06:44 PM
robjh22
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
4
Sep 8, 2015 12:31 PM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 8, 2015 10:45 AM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 1, 2015 01:19 PM



