Cities can now take your homes
I lust for a M24
Joined: November 6, 2004
Posts: 7,042
Likes: 4
From: Football HOF, Canton OH
I'm on there, but people need to do more than just that. It's funny how twisted the Constitution is now. Originally the Constitution gave us the Freedom of Religion... now if your kid brings a Bible to school, he can get sent home. (yes, it's happened) Christian's are loosing their right to Religion in any public setting and there are many examples of this. Now originally the Constitution protected our Right to Property, now it's being used to allow Government to take property from one private individual and give it to another for development.
Disgusting!
Disgusting!
Mach 1 Member
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 756
Likes: 3
Originally posted by 05GT-O.C.D.@June 27, 2005, 10:15 PM
I'm on there, but people need to do more than just that. It's funny how twisted the Constitution is now. Originally the Constitution gave us the Freedom of Religion... now if your kid brings a Bible to school, he can get sent home. (yes, it's happened) Christian's are loosing their right to Religion in any public setting and there are many examples of this. Now originally the Constitution protected our Right to Property, now it's being used to allow Government to take property from one private individual and give it to another for development.
Disgusting!
I'm on there, but people need to do more than just that. It's funny how twisted the Constitution is now. Originally the Constitution gave us the Freedom of Religion... now if your kid brings a Bible to school, he can get sent home. (yes, it's happened) Christian's are loosing their right to Religion in any public setting and there are many examples of this. Now originally the Constitution protected our Right to Property, now it's being used to allow Government to take property from one private individual and give it to another for development.
Disgusting!
Most of the population is to lazy or ill informed (not that they care enough to listen when you try to explain it to them) to do anything.
socialism is BAD and it is taking over our government, I say its high time we overthrow the government (forcefully if necessary) and return our county to the free county that this is supposed to be.
Whos with me?
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
Joined: September 26, 2004
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: TN
Originally posted by mobster@June 27, 2005, 8:56 PM
everybody go here and sign the petition.
That means you, that means now!
everybody go here and sign the petition.
That means you, that means now!
BTW~It may not have meant a regualr building elevator. But they are soo careful that there usually no inturrupation problems. But it only stated elevator. So, if I want to take land to build a regular elevator then legally & constatutionally they would have to give it to me.
Shelby GT500 Member
Joined: March 10, 2004
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 2
From: Sherman, TX
ROFL!!!!
Also: http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45029
Press Release
For Release Monday, June 27 to New Hampshire media
For Release Tuesday, June 28 to all other media
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice and participants in the Free State Project among others.
For Release Monday, June 27 to New Hampshire media
For Release Tuesday, June 28 to all other media
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice and participants in the Free State Project among others.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
