All things Photography
8/25/14, 07:21 PM
#41
Member
Join Date: August 22, 2014
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the 70-200...I would stick with Canon. Maybe check out the f/4 version. I have tried third party lenses in that range, nothing beats the manufacturer for fast, zoom lenses, IMO.
Last edited by ststang; 8/25/14 at 07:22 PM.
8/26/14, 06:11 AM
#42
Bullitt Member
Wow some really nice shots, looks like some of you guys have some good photography skills.
I am looking to get a couple of lenses in the next 6-9 months or so, and would like to get some input. My skill level is, Amateur/hobbyist. Still learning a lot. I currently have a Canon Rebel, it's been a good camera to learn on. I'll look to upgrade it sometime too, but that's another conversation. I do not plan on going full frame either.
I'm wanting to get a 70-200 f2.8 with IS(image stabilization), I've started researching the Sigma and Tamron, and they are priced in the range that I want to pay. I've rented the White lens and it is very nice; however, I dont want to pay the White lens price.
For you members who have used the Sigma or the Tamron 70-200. How do you like them, pros/cons, would you purchase anything different now that you've owned it? "I should have gotten the other brand". Or you should really save for the Great White beast.
2. I am wanting an ultra wide angle: 10-20, 10-22, and I'm intrigued by the Sigma 8-16 except for the fish eye look, would make using filters difficult. Same questions here. Looking at Sigma, Tamron, and Canon.
Thanks for any input.
I am looking to get a couple of lenses in the next 6-9 months or so, and would like to get some input. My skill level is, Amateur/hobbyist. Still learning a lot. I currently have a Canon Rebel, it's been a good camera to learn on. I'll look to upgrade it sometime too, but that's another conversation. I do not plan on going full frame either.
I'm wanting to get a 70-200 f2.8 with IS(image stabilization), I've started researching the Sigma and Tamron, and they are priced in the range that I want to pay. I've rented the White lens and it is very nice; however, I dont want to pay the White lens price.
For you members who have used the Sigma or the Tamron 70-200. How do you like them, pros/cons, would you purchase anything different now that you've owned it? "I should have gotten the other brand". Or you should really save for the Great White beast.
2. I am wanting an ultra wide angle: 10-20, 10-22, and I'm intrigued by the Sigma 8-16 except for the fish eye look, would make using filters difficult. Same questions here. Looking at Sigma, Tamron, and Canon.
Thanks for any input.
I also have the Sigma 10-22 wide angle. I don't use it all that often but it is a good one.
You are going at this the correct way. Keep the Rebel and get good glass and when you are ready get a new body. If you stay with the L lenses you can go full frame which is fairly expensive.
8/26/14, 07:11 AM
#43
Cobra R Member
Thread Starter
Wow some really nice shots, looks like some of you guys have some good photography skills.
I am looking to get a couple of lenses in the next 6-9 months or so, and would like to get some input. My skill level is, Amateur/hobbyist. Still learning a lot. I currently have a Canon Rebel, it's been a good camera to learn on. I'll look to upgrade it sometime too, but that's another conversation. I do not plan on going full frame either.
I'm wanting to get a 70-200 f2.8 with IS(image stabilization), I've started researching the Sigma and Tamron, and they are priced in the range that I want to pay. I've rented the White lens and it is very nice; however, I dont want to pay the White lens price.
For you members who have used the Sigma or the Tamron 70-200. How do you like them, pros/cons, would you purchase anything different now that you've owned it? "I should have gotten the other brand". Or you should really save for the Great White beast.
2. I am wanting an ultra wide angle: 10-20, 10-22, and I'm intrigued by the Sigma 8-16 except for the fish eye look, would make using filters difficult. Same questions here. Looking at Sigma, Tamron, and Canon.
Thanks for any input.
I am looking to get a couple of lenses in the next 6-9 months or so, and would like to get some input. My skill level is, Amateur/hobbyist. Still learning a lot. I currently have a Canon Rebel, it's been a good camera to learn on. I'll look to upgrade it sometime too, but that's another conversation. I do not plan on going full frame either.
I'm wanting to get a 70-200 f2.8 with IS(image stabilization), I've started researching the Sigma and Tamron, and they are priced in the range that I want to pay. I've rented the White lens and it is very nice; however, I dont want to pay the White lens price.
For you members who have used the Sigma or the Tamron 70-200. How do you like them, pros/cons, would you purchase anything different now that you've owned it? "I should have gotten the other brand". Or you should really save for the Great White beast.
2. I am wanting an ultra wide angle: 10-20, 10-22, and I'm intrigued by the Sigma 8-16 except for the fish eye look, would make using filters difficult. Same questions here. Looking at Sigma, Tamron, and Canon.
Thanks for any input.
I like it alot, though i kinda screwed mine up a bit but it still works pretty well.
I never tried the tamron or canon version. Tamron will be a little bit lower then the sigma. Version 1 of the canon should be about the same as the tamron and version 2 should be better.
couple shots i've taken with it
Standing alone by MurerImages, on Flickr
20140621-IMG_7304 by MurerImages, on Flickr
Digesting. by MurerImages, on Flickr
20140305-IMG_5585 by MurerImages, on Flickr
8/26/14, 05:06 PM
#44
Mach 1 Member
I have a Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 Ultra Wide Angle lens which I highly recommend on a cropped sensor like your camera has. It is not a Fisheye but, for the price, it is a quality lens. In fact, I prefer it to the Nikon 10-24mm.
For the 70-200...I would stick with Canon. Maybe check out the f/4 version. I have tried third party lenses in that range, nothing beats the manufacturer for fast, zoom lenses, IMO.
For the 70-200...I would stick with Canon. Maybe check out the f/4 version. I have tried third party lenses in that range, nothing beats the manufacturer for fast, zoom lenses, IMO.
I have used both Sigma and Canon lenses. Actually in the set with Miriam earlier in this thread I used a Sigma 50-150 on a 7D. Canon's lenses are a bit more sharp and the auto focus seems to be quicker.
I also have the Sigma 10-22 wide angle. I don't use it all that often but it is a good one.
You are going at this the correct way. Keep the Rebel and get good glass and when you are ready get a new body. If you stay with the L lenses you can go full frame which is fairly expensive.
I also have the Sigma 10-22 wide angle. I don't use it all that often but it is a good one.
You are going at this the correct way. Keep the Rebel and get good glass and when you are ready get a new body. If you stay with the L lenses you can go full frame which is fairly expensive.
I have the 70-200 sigma 2.8 with OS ( same as IS).
I like it alot, though i kinda screwed mine up a bit but it still works pretty well.
I never tried the tamron or canon version. Tamron will be a little bit lower then the sigma. Version 1 of the canon should be about the same as the tamron and version 2 should be better.
couple shots i've taken with it
r
I like it alot, though i kinda screwed mine up a bit but it still works pretty well.
I never tried the tamron or canon version. Tamron will be a little bit lower then the sigma. Version 1 of the canon should be about the same as the tamron and version 2 should be better.
couple shots i've taken with it
r
On the 70-200, what are your thoughts around a used canon version 1. I've seen a couple in the classifieds (photography on the net) and they appeared to be in very good condition to near mint condition.
8/27/14, 06:33 AM
#45
Cobra R Member
Thread Starter
Thanks for the replies Gentlemen, really good recommendations. I'm going to see if my local camera shop has any used versions they would let me 'rent' or borrow for a day to see how I like the lens.
On the 70-200, what are your thoughts around a used canon version 1. I've seen a couple in the classifieds (photography on the net) and they appeared to be in very good condition to near mint condition.
On the 70-200, what are your thoughts around a used canon version 1. I've seen a couple in the classifieds (photography on the net) and they appeared to be in very good condition to near mint condition.
8/27/14, 06:36 AM
#46
Bullitt Member
I have had pretty good luck buying used. Although I had a guy send me a 50mm lens in an envelope one time. I will just say that didn't turn out very well. Which Sigma did you buy used? The 70-200?
8/27/14, 07:02 AM
#47
Member
Join Date: August 22, 2014
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have have very good luck buying used. Lenses, if taken care of, can last a long time. Check out keh.com to get an idea how much used lenses go for and the type of conditions they are rated at.
Last edited by ststang; 8/27/14 at 07:56 AM.
8/27/14, 07:09 AM
#48
Cobra R Member
Thread Starter
8/27/14, 07:21 AM
#49
Bullitt Member
8/27/14, 08:04 AM
#50
Cobra R Member
Thread Starter
Though I like the IQ of the 70-200 and its a nice lens.
8/27/14, 01:27 PM
#52
Shelby GT500 Member
i purchase a used D3100 nikon quite a while back.. day time it works fine, have no issue. but at night its auto focus will never work and even when i do manual focus. it looks good in eyefinder but pics comes blur. i read that stock lens dotn work good in low light, so got a used 35mm prime lens. i m still having the same issue. it got to a point i stopped taking pics
8/27/14, 01:45 PM
#53
Bullitt Member
i purchase a used D3100 nikon quite a while back.. day time it works fine, have no issue. but at night its auto focus will never work and even when i do manual focus. it looks good in eyefinder but pics comes blur. i read that stock lens dotn work good in low light, so got a used 35mm prime lens. i m still having the same issue. it got to a point i stopped taking pics
This is just a very basic quick lesson and I hope it helps.
8/27/14, 01:46 PM
#54
Member
Join Date: August 22, 2014
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i purchase a used D3100 nikon quite a while back.. day time it works fine, have no issue. but at night its auto focus will never work and even when i do manual focus. it looks good in eyefinder but pics comes blur. i read that stock lens dotn work good in low light, so got a used 35mm prime lens. i m still having the same issue. it got to a point i stopped taking pics
Here is an example using a tripod during a long (6 second) exposure. In this case, I wanted the water to blur. The people kept still long enough.
Last edited by ststang; 8/27/14 at 01:48 PM.
8/27/14, 02:09 PM
#55
Member
Join Date: August 22, 2014
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let me add that Nikon cameras have settings for Auto ISO. Which means you set the base ISO which it will try to keep but, as the light fades or you go inside a building, it will automatically increase the camera's ISO to compensate. Check your manual on how the D3100 does this.
8/28/14, 06:26 PM
#58
Mach 1 Member
8/28/14, 06:43 PM
#59
Super Boss Lawman Member
yeah. I had a 7D a while back but but paid 1500 for the kit. I sold the body a year later for 900 because i just didn't use it and found it complex. The weight and size of the camera suited me though. The 60D was a bit smallish for my liking. That being said, the 60D has the flip/rotational view screen whereas the 7D was fixed. I might go with a 60D later this year if i get a camera again. Then my lenses will fit it.
8/28/14, 07:01 PM
#60
Bullitt Member
yeah. I had a 7D a while back but but paid 1500 for the kit. I sold the body a year later for 900 because i just didn't use it and found it complex. The weight and size of the camera suited me though. The 60D was a bit smallish for my liking. That being said, the 60D has the flip/rotational view screen whereas the 7D was fixed. I might go with a 60D later this year if i get a camera again. Then my lenses will fit it.