General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

Supercharger Vs Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 28, 2007 | 11:23 PM
  #21  
hi5.0's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Originally Posted by Moosetang
From a production and do-it-yourself standpoint we're talking parallel twin-turbo. You use two identical small(ish) turbochargers (one for each exhaust bank on the V) which spool up faster than one large (cutting down lag), while still producing alot of power by their combined action. Add in modern turbo tech like variable geometry and you can have a pretty devasating setup with minimal complexity.

Sequential Twin-turbos use a two-stage setup where one small turbo runs all the time and a second only kicks in at high RPM for top-end. Problem is that you have to plumb all your exhaust through both, which is a minor nightmare. Racing machines and exotic can pull that off, but not regular production cars or home conversions.
RX-7's (FD) had a sequential twin turbo system - which was a nightmare when things went wrong. I'm guessing the last-gen TT Supras had a similar setup.

But, turbo FTW!
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 11:03 AM
  #22  
Moosetang's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by hi5.0
RX-7's (FD) had a sequential twin turbo system - which was a nightmare when things went wrong. I'm guessing the last-gen TT Supras had a similar setup.

But, turbo FTW!
Indeed. Sequentials are slightly practical for rotaries and inlines, since all the exhaust is grouped already one of the principal problems is solved. Still bloody horrible when things go wrong.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
67
Sep 2, 2024 04:46 PM
Antigini-GT/CS
2005-2009 Mustang
5
Oct 5, 2015 09:43 AM
JonathonK
2005-2009 Mustang
2
Sep 19, 2015 03:19 AM
MustangGTCS13
2010-2014 Mustang
9
Sep 17, 2015 07:38 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:02 AM.