Supercharger Vs Turbo
The parasitic nature of the Supercharger is a knock against it, but it's got better power-on-demand. However, with modern, multi-stage turbos and better intercoolers I have to give the turbocharger the nod these days. A well-built twin-turbo set up is just marvelous.
Yeah it really depends on what you want. If you are looking for big power, then turbo is the way to go, like others said...more costly.
If you are going SC then a roots or screw type SC is the way to go. Very simple. power from idle all the way up.
If you are going SC then a roots or screw type SC is the way to go. Very simple. power from idle all the way up.
I'd go with a turbo (depending on how your car is used). I had a twin screw supercharger (Saleen) and the torque curve was boring.
I've heard that the heat generated by a turbo can be very problematic on a road course.
I think even the single turbos these days are great. Very low boost threshold and lag.
I'd go with a turbo (depending on how your car is used). I had a twin screw supercharger (Saleen) and the torque curve was boring.
I've heard that the heat generated by a turbo can be very problematic on a road course.
I'd go with a turbo (depending on how your car is used). I had a twin screw supercharger (Saleen) and the torque curve was boring.
I've heard that the heat generated by a turbo can be very problematic on a road course.
True, but I think most people just want to buy a "kit" and be done with it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but most Mustang turbo kits don't upgrade the cooling system and are mainly designed for steet driving / drag racing.
I'm sure you could put some heat wrap on the exhaust side of the turbo you would be perfectly fine.
i really prfer naturally aspirated motors. think about it.
say you got a 400 hp N/A 5.0 and a
supercharged/turboed 400 hp 5.0
If you but the naturally aspirated one it is easier to put a supercharger on it and have 500 hp vs having to up the boost on the stock supercharger and run the risk of the internals failing
say you got a 400 hp N/A 5.0 and a
supercharged/turboed 400 hp 5.0
If you but the naturally aspirated one it is easier to put a supercharger on it and have 500 hp vs having to up the boost on the stock supercharger and run the risk of the internals failing
Before I got into Mustangs, I've generally thought most twin-turbo setups involved one giant turbo (for ridiculous boost) and one small turbo (for boost while the big one spools up).
With our V8, it looks like that option (or even single turbo) would be alot more work, because we naturally have two exhaust lines... and it looks like twin symmetrical turbos seem alot simpler than different twin turbos or a single turbo..
I'm new to this. So when you guys are referring to "twin turbo," which kind of "twin turbo" are you guys referring to? Any words on advantages/disadvantages?
With our V8, it looks like that option (or even single turbo) would be alot more work, because we naturally have two exhaust lines... and it looks like twin symmetrical turbos seem alot simpler than different twin turbos or a single turbo..
I'm new to this. So when you guys are referring to "twin turbo," which kind of "twin turbo" are you guys referring to? Any words on advantages/disadvantages?
i really prfer naturally aspirated motors. think about it.
say you got a 400 hp N/A 5.0 and a
supercharged/turboed 400 hp 5.0
If you but the naturally aspirated one it is easier to put a supercharger on it and have 500 hp vs having to up the boost on the stock supercharger and run the risk of the internals failing
say you got a 400 hp N/A 5.0 and a
supercharged/turboed 400 hp 5.0
If you but the naturally aspirated one it is easier to put a supercharger on it and have 500 hp vs having to up the boost on the stock supercharger and run the risk of the internals failing
That's the great thing about FI. The car drives like stock until you get into the boost.
Before I got into Mustangs, I've generally thought most twin-turbo setups involved one giant turbo (for ridiculous boost) and one small turbo (for boost while the big one spools up).
With our V8, it looks like that option (or even single turbo) would be alot more work, because we naturally have two exhaust lines... and it looks like twin symmetrical turbos seem alot simpler than different twin turbos or a single turbo..
I'm new to this. So when you guys are referring to "twin turbo," which kind of "twin turbo" are you guys referring to? Any words on advantages/disadvantages?
With our V8, it looks like that option (or even single turbo) would be alot more work, because we naturally have two exhaust lines... and it looks like twin symmetrical turbos seem alot simpler than different twin turbos or a single turbo..
I'm new to this. So when you guys are referring to "twin turbo," which kind of "twin turbo" are you guys referring to? Any words on advantages/disadvantages?
Sequential Twin-turbos use a two-stage setup where one small turbo runs all the time and a second only kicks in at high RPM for top-end. Problem is that you have to plumb all your exhaust through both, which is a minor nightmare. Racing machines and exotic can pull that off, but not regular production cars or home conversions.
i really prfer naturally aspirated motors. think about it.
say you got a 400 hp N/A 5.0 and a
supercharged/turboed 400 hp 5.0
If you but the naturally aspirated one it is easier to put a supercharger on it and have 500 hp vs having to up the boost on the stock supercharger and run the risk of the internals failing
say you got a 400 hp N/A 5.0 and a
supercharged/turboed 400 hp 5.0
If you but the naturally aspirated one it is easier to put a supercharger on it and have 500 hp vs having to up the boost on the stock supercharger and run the risk of the internals failing
Also, generally any engine cranking out a lot of NA power would have a high compression ratio, to run boost you need to lower the compression (or else...). So its not like you can take a real wild NA setup (say 400hp 5.0) and just strap on a blower running the same amount of boost as you could put on a 225hp 5.0.



