http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/14/f...ages-leak-out/

 

Ugly as usual

 

Don't like it

 

neve been a huge fan of these things but i really dig those lights and some of the front end details

 

 

I dunno why, but I like it.

 

They all look the same to me

 

Definitely evolutionary, but perhaps that's appropriate as the brand's senior model: to be a bit more toned down than the more stylish and radical Evoque. I basically like the clean, refined, even elegant styling, even if its a bit too low-key and not butch/flashy enough a truck for a lot of American tastes. Definitely more fox hunt than tractor pull.

That it shed an impressive 700lbs is impressive.

 

ehhh. interior is innovative. exterior not making me impressed.

The Evoque is BAD sexy.... just wish it had power.

 

I think it looks good, seems this and the explorer keep trading styling between them. Seems natural they would take the sexy evoque look and bring it over a bit to the Range Rover

 

The RR faithful are probably pretty happy with it. I'm all about the simplistic/clean/elegant looking interior though.

 

The interior is nice enough, but not a fan of what they've done to the outside. I know they wanted to tie into the success of the Evoque, but it just doesn't work for me.

 

 

Reminds me of someone morphing a 2012 Explorer and a Flex.

No way worth the ridiculous MSRP that it'll sell for.

 

I think it's other way around, since Range Rover had this design since 2002 - way before Flex and/or Explorer.

 

Ranger Rover had the 2013 design since 2002? I can definitely see what 05GT-O.C.D. is referring to, speaking to the exterior design of the 2013 Range Rover.

 

Range Rover Mk. III was introduced in 2002 and it looks about 90% the same as the "new" 2013 Range Rover Mk. IV.

 

the rear overhang is the worst aspect, imho. The upward taper is for departure clearance, but I would have kept the accent line lower.