This just what mustang owners need

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 5, 2005 | 05:35 PM

#21

korinwoodo

Shelby GT350 Member

Joined: October 9, 2005

Posts: 2,172

Likes: 1

Hm. Maybe ontario did something about it. I geuss the 400 units could have gone to business owners or what not.

Dec 5, 2005 | 05:38 PM

#22

THRUST_

Cobra Member

Joined: January 27, 2005

Posts: 1,398

Likes: 0

no photo radar here in N.S. either.

and Scott, I think Arins II would be carb'd

Dec 5, 2005 | 05:48 PM

#23

future9er24

Post *****

Joined: May 13, 2004

Posts: 18,616

Likes: 3

From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA

Quote:

Originally posted by scottie1113@December 4, 2005, 11:39 PM
Arin, have you ever had a car with a carb? I have--I grew up in that era and have had to rebuild a few on both cars and bikes--and I can can tell you that fuel injection is SO much better. But this is off topic.

This proposal is so outrageous that I can hardly hold back my invective. I'm sure Ralph Nader likes it...

Quoted post

when i said that i originally meant it as a joke :P i really dont expect anyone to ditch EFI and slap on a carb. but i do have one in my II, and... well its "fun" i guess lol, but not in the cold

i do know the advantages of EFI, i was just being my usual, self, screwing aroun :P

but im still very opposed to this idea of speed control. i hope to someday own more stangs than just my II, and if its speed limited ima be PO'd. ill definatly do what i can to kill that little bugger, but im afraid that i wont knoe what the heck im doing. all those wires scare me...

but anyhow, its all good... well except these bums trying to control our cars...

and what would this all mean for ppl who have street cars that they take to the track on weekends? i think speed limiting at a race track is counterproductive, and thats not even counting those instances where speeding might be neccasary to avoid a crash.