GM reports biggest-ever automotive loss
2/12/08, 10:45 AM
#2
We pretty much knew this was coming given the 39 billion dollar loss they reported for the third quarter. But the fact that they cannot stay away from the buyouts doesn't bode well and smacks of desperation. Once or twice isn't really surprising, but continually running back to the well indicates that things may be going worse at GM than even they expected them to.
2/12/08, 11:47 AM
#4
Cobra Member
Join Date: May 16, 2006
Location: NV
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2/13/08, 12:27 AM
#5
Closet American
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Call that article media spin. Here's a more realistic analysis >>
The interesting thing is that this record $38.7 billion loss that the automotive media's talking (too much) about is not at all attributable to GM's performance at selling cars and trucks around the world in 2007. Nearly all of it is the result of an accounting adjustment, which we explained in detail last November. It represents past losses that GM was legally allowed to wait to report and finally did in Q3 2007.
Regardless of the truth, sensational headlines that include the words "record loss" have been plastered across the interweb all day. Since it's too hard explaining how the tax system for large corporations works, Lutz instead pulls the old "bad news here, look over there" trick. He points out that GM was one of the few automakers to report a rise in sales last month at 2.1%. According to our By the Numbers calculations, GM was the only automaker with multiple brands to do so.
More
Regardless of the truth, sensational headlines that include the words "record loss" have been plastered across the interweb all day. Since it's too hard explaining how the tax system for large corporations works, Lutz instead pulls the old "bad news here, look over there" trick. He points out that GM was one of the few automakers to report a rise in sales last month at 2.1%. According to our By the Numbers calculations, GM was the only automaker with multiple brands to do so.
More
2/13/08, 12:31 AM
#6
Team Mustang Source
Sounds pretty bad on the surface, but I still think GM is on the right track to both profitability and building quality cars. Ford is following, they are just a little bit behind right now.
2/13/08, 05:06 AM
#7
Closet American
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I suspect GM is further ahead because they got serious about turnaround earlier than Ford did, and because they're a much bigger company with deeper pockets and greater resources.
2/13/08, 12:34 PM
#8
Team Mustang Source
Exactly. Ford and GM are both on the same path, GM just started down that path about 1 year earlier than Ford did. GM got into trouble first, and started restructuring first. Ford followed, and is still behind for that reason only. They will both get there eventually.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
roushcollection
Auto Shows and Events
0
7/28/15 02:08 PM