Dodge Charger pics...
12/29/04, 10:14 AM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: July 24, 2004
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Look at the hiney-end of this car! Oh, yeah, and it even has the '05 Mustang's optional "concept" rims!
http://forums.pickuptruck.com/showflat.php...sb=5&o=&fpart=1
http://forums.pickuptruck.com/showflat.php...sb=5&o=&fpart=1
12/29/04, 02:24 PM
#3
Post *****
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
its not that bad. i likes it more than the 300C. kinda nice actually. there should be two door version and i also think it looks a bit like the stang. the roofline at least...
12/29/04, 04:26 PM
#5
Cobra Member
Join Date: December 18, 2004
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And remember how sweet the concept looked?
Google Search of Charger Concept Pics
Such potential. Truly a shame.
Google Search of Charger Concept Pics
Such potential. Truly a shame.
12/29/04, 06:30 PM
#6
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: November 4, 2004
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's the full size 300C with different lights and a different rear roofline.
I like the idea of using the old Chrger name,. but like the '68 T-bird compared to the '57...it just ain't the same. A totally new Charger, similar to the original would have been nice. And remember, the original Charger was a Dodge Coronet with a fasat back roofline...but it was amazingly sweet! Old age counts for something!
I like the idea of using the old Chrger name,. but like the '68 T-bird compared to the '57...it just ain't the same. A totally new Charger, similar to the original would have been nice. And remember, the original Charger was a Dodge Coronet with a fasat back roofline...but it was amazingly sweet! Old age counts for something!
12/30/04, 10:21 AM
#12
Cobra Member
Join Date: July 29, 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by DiamondBlue@December 29, 2004, 3:29 PM
And remember how sweet the concept looked?
Such potential. Truly a shame.
And remember how sweet the concept looked?
Such potential. Truly a shame.
12/30/04, 10:33 AM
#13
While it will make a nice, sporty sedan, especially in SRT trim, I still don't think it deserves the Charger name.
They could have shortened the chassis a bit and built a nice fastback coupe that would be a Mustang competitor, especially with the LX chassis which seems pretty good.
I still want to see the car in person. What is lost from the pictures is the way the rear quarters have shoulders.
Looks like a decent car, the should have called it something else.
They could have shortened the chassis a bit and built a nice fastback coupe that would be a Mustang competitor, especially with the LX chassis which seems pretty good.
I still want to see the car in person. What is lost from the pictures is the way the rear quarters have shoulders.
Looks like a decent car, the should have called it something else.
12/30/04, 03:28 PM
#14
Originally posted by Roadster2005@December 29, 2004, 10:15 PM
I have a feeling they wont as i have heard alot of Charger fans have sent hate mail to Daimler Chrysler saying this isnt a charger it should be the Intrepid II
I have a feeling they wont as i have heard alot of Charger fans have sent hate mail to Daimler Chrysler saying this isnt a charger it should be the Intrepid II
12/30/04, 06:03 PM
#16
Post *****
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Looks like a decent car, the should have called it something else.
12/31/04, 11:17 AM
#17
After all these years,
My C/T still sucks!
My C/T still sucks!
Join Date: May 5, 2004
Location: Orlando(DP!) Florida
Posts: 7,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.allpar.com/model/charger.html
There is only one charger-------
Thats like taking a 69 camaro and friggin it up into a family car(see Malibu by chevy)
There is only one charger-------
Thats like taking a 69 camaro and friggin it up into a family car(see Malibu by chevy)
1/1/05, 12:28 AM
#18
Bullitt Member
Join Date: August 20, 2004
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sorry but this car looks awful, I think dodge did a very bad job on this you dont turn a world famous muscle car into a family sedan, stick a hemi in and say its an automatic classic! BAD JOB 
:notnice: 
:notnice:
1/1/05, 10:25 AM
#19
Cobra R Member
Join Date: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
man, i'm shocked at the responses i'm reading. Ignore the name, which we can all admit is a mistake, and just think about what this car is. Its a sedan that has a beefy front end, angry looking, forward leaning nose, nice hips over the back wheels (the 05 stang shoulda had those, i hope we see some soon) and a fastback roofline stretched over four doors. And an optional 5.7L V8.
If this is what the Ford 500 looked like, you'd love it, admit it! Its just too bad that dodge went with the charger name. But hey, for someone who needs a family car, this thing is pretty sweet.
I really can't get over those hips, lets see some on a 2010 stang or something.
If this is what the Ford 500 looked like, you'd love it, admit it! Its just too bad that dodge went with the charger name. But hey, for someone who needs a family car, this thing is pretty sweet.
I really can't get over those hips, lets see some on a 2010 stang or something.
1/1/05, 10:27 AM
#20
Cobra R Member
Join Date: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dodge needs a new four door a lot more than it needs a muscle car right now. They'll make lots of money off of this. But ya, they shoulda saved that name for a mustang competitor somewhere down the line.