Charger SRT-8...nope still ugly
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Serbian Steamer





Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Originally posted by mobster@April 1, 2005, 1:07 AM
If you take the ugliest thing you can think of, and combined it with second ugliest thing you can think of, then hit it for a while with an ugly stick it would still look better than this car.
If you take the ugliest thing you can think of, and combined it with second ugliest thing you can think of, then hit it for a while with an ugly stick it would still look better than this car.

Originally posted by Red Star+April 1, 2005, 2:14 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Red Star @ April 1, 2005, 2:14 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-mobster@April 1, 2005, 1:07 AM
If you take the ugliest thing you can think of, and combined it with second ugliest thing you can think of, then hit it for a while with an ugly stick it would still look better than this car.
If you take the ugliest thing you can think of, and combined it with second ugliest thing you can think of, then hit it for a while with an ugly stick it would still look better than this car.

[/b][/quote]
Agreed. I'm not to happy w/ the 4 door Charger decision but, Dodge is doin' a helluva lot better w/ design and products than GM. Plus it is the 1st sedan I would purchase if I weren't purchasing a 'Stang. Especially the black SRT8 they got posted on their website.
I personally, have grown to like it, the GTO too, come on guys, do you really want the FWD 4-banger Japanese-traps around forever?? sorry if this seems offensive to any, but ANY v-8 RWD performance car is better than no v-8 RWD performance car.... the Charger's name was ruined ages ago... just look at it like this, even though the GTO is a restyled Grand Am, it is one step away from the FWD era... WE STILL NEED MORE!! :ranting: sorry, I'm done now...
Fugly, and don't try to convince me different. 
name aside, the windows look ill-fit to the rest of the car, the rear end looks like an afterthought of an Intrepid and the roofline is a cartoonsish parody of a classic car. Total Meekrob.

name aside, the windows look ill-fit to the rest of the car, the rear end looks like an afterthought of an Intrepid and the roofline is a cartoonsish parody of a classic car. Total Meekrob.
Originally posted by Moosetang@April 5, 2005, 2:24 PM
Fugly, and don't try to convince me different.
name aside, the windows look ill-fit to the rest of the car, the rear end looks like an afterthought of an Intrepid and the roofline is a cartoonsish parody of a classic car. Total Meekrob.
Fugly, and don't try to convince me different.

name aside, the windows look ill-fit to the rest of the car, the rear end looks like an afterthought of an Intrepid and the roofline is a cartoonsish parody of a classic car. Total Meekrob.
Originally posted by Moosetang@April 5, 2005, 12:24 PM
Fugly, and don't try to convince me different.
name aside, the windows look ill-fit to the rest of the car, the rear end looks like an afterthought of an Intrepid and the roofline is a cartoonsish parody of a classic car. Total Meekrob.
Fugly, and don't try to convince me different.

name aside, the windows look ill-fit to the rest of the car, the rear end looks like an afterthought of an Intrepid and the roofline is a cartoonsish parody of a classic car. Total Meekrob.
(Not that it matters, as most Chargers, except for the 68-70 model years, were butt-ugly or generically dull)
I was hoping that once I saw it in person, that I would somehow find some redeeming quality...yet, I was still disappointed. The closest thing I can think of is that it is a 300 in drag...I don't know, it is just such a dismal car in terms of aesthetics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jim010
2010-2014 Mustang
29
Oct 12, 2015 08:33 PM



