General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

2011/12 Chevy Camaro Z28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 12:17 AM
  #21  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by Jinx
OR this.........

sorry i had too, because you said that.
LOL




Last edited by cdynaco; Jan 22, 2010 at 03:11 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 12:48 AM
  #22  
Jinx's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bob
Depends on how you define "rebadged"? The F5 is based on a different platform, but borrowing components where they can from the CTS-V isn't nessecarily a bad thing, especially the track package brakes.
Correct. The Camaro is a Zeta II platform which is based from the Zeta platform (Pontiac G8, Holden Statesman/Commodore)
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 06:12 AM
  #23  
fdjizm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 6, 2008
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 2
If I was GM management wouldn't I be more concerned with making high volume efficient cars so I can pay the billions back? or making niche cars for gearheads that aren't high volume?

IMO GM doesn't have the room to "play" they should really focus on making some money and digging them selves out of the grave.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 09:59 AM
  #24  
krnpimpsta's Avatar
 
Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC Metro Area
Originally Posted by houtex
It's 'crapping'. 'Craping' is the verb form of 'crape', which is a weird morph of 'crepe' which is one of these things:

A black armband of mourning (or in Japan, protest)
The material of choice, whether it's paper or cloth, has a crinkled look to it.
A delicious breakfast food when done right.

Yet and still, it was such a visual image, I just... had... to find out... I know, I'm odd, but that's normal for me.

Therefore, I did a GIS for '+rainbow +craping +unicorn'. I didn't find anything, even when using the various forms of 'crepe' and such. I found rainbow unicorns, and rainbow crepe material, but not the visual depicted.

So then I changed the word: 'unicorn crapping rainbow'... and lo and behold, there they were... idn't them thar intarwebs amazin'?..:
Haha, hilarious.. I thought I was on 4chan for a second..
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 10:07 AM
  #25  
krnpimpsta's Avatar
 
Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC Metro Area
I don't think we should bash Chevy for coming out with a GT500-competitor. It looks almost as bad as the Camaro5 guys who ragged constantly on the 5.0L mustang claiming that those numbers will never come true - and then when they did, finding something else to complain about.

Even if they come out with those numbers, it will still probably underperform against the GT500, due to weight. BUT... even if it doesn't, and it blows our GT500 out of the water - who cares? Are we less manly because Chevy has one-upped the top-trim Mustang that most of us don't even own? Do our Mustang's become less enjoyable to drive, or less nice to look at?

Financial bailout or not - if GM wants to invest their time and money building a GT500-competitor, then let them. Who knows, it may even help them in the long run by bolstering the image of the regular Camaro, by having a Z28 that replaces the GT500 as top dog pony car. And if they sell more Camaros, you, the tax-payers, win. Anyone who is truely making the argument against the Z28 based on "wasting tax dollars" - you guys should hope and pray it smokes the GT500, so that GM can sell a crapload of Camaro's and pay back their loan from the government.

There's no reason to bash GM for trying to come out with a GT500 competitor in this environment.. business is business and if their bean counters think it's a good idea to invest in a GT500 killer, then props to them. Let the pony car battle go on - I sincerely hope they come with a Z28 that performs better than expected. You get your tax dollars returned from GM to the government - and Ford has a reason to make the GT500 into a real monster performer.

Competition makes all of us (the consumers) win.

Last edited by krnpimpsta; Jan 22, 2010 at 10:10 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 10:16 AM
  #26  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by bob
Depends on how you define "rebadged"? The F5 is based on a different platform, but borrowing components where they can from the CTS-V isn't nessecarily a bad thing, especially the track package brakes.
Didn't say it was a bad thing, its just that I personally am not that excited about it since the car basically exists already in CTS-V form
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 01:53 PM
  #27  
WuTimeUT's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2005
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
I would love to see a camaro with those numbers. Like steve set, competition is good for everyone.

On a side not, I have yet to see a "modified" camaro on the street. Not even exhaust! Everytime I see one its bone stock. Whats the deal with that?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2010 | 02:02 PM
  #28  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
how ironic, i saw my first modified camaro today and thought myself it was the first one i've seen
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2010 | 12:28 AM
  #29  
Slims00ls1z28's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2007
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by yeahyouknwit
Source? I'll believe it when i see it. As far as I know the Z28 is still off the table as of now.
Yep so far nothing official has come down the pipe.

Originally Posted by thomasstang09
IMHO, the "Z/28" is a mythical white unicorn craping rainbows. 550 HP in that heavy of a car won't hold a candle to the gt500. GM needs to concentrate on returning my tax dollars instead of building a limited production special edition of the crudmaro!
I wouldn't be too begrudgen to it or think the GT500 is a slam dunk away from it. The GT500 is no lightweight by any means. And if I am not mistaken the 4 door CTS-V performs against it in just about every aspect quite well. A lighter version of it (CTS-V) should be able to hold it's own. It's not all about max HP, tq and weight. Gearing (the A6 1st gear is brutal) powerband etc all come into play and from what I remember the 6.2 puts out better under the curve numbers than the 4.6 mill. Reguardless of which is ultimately "faster" it would be a driver's race any day with those 2 in a hypothetical match up

Originally Posted by WuTimeUT
I would love to see a camaro with those numbers. Like steve set, competition is good for everyone.

On a side not, I have yet to see a "modified" camaro on the street. Not even exhaust! Everytime I see one its bone stock. Whats the deal with that?
Must be the area. Theres plenty out there. Many of the vendors on other sites posted pics of bays full of them getting all manner of mods. Most time you will probably see them at the track as I do with all the local termi's.


WASSUP Jinxy! welcome aboard!
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2010 | 02:24 AM
  #30  
2005GTDELUXE's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: August 12, 2005
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 1
From: CT
Originally Posted by jgray5
Hey guys, just read about this....I wanna hear your guys intake on what you think about this.


Z28

556 hp
551 ft/tq
I think it';s cool. I also am a member on C5 and 3rd gen. The new Camaro SE and the new Mustang 5.0 are great.

I reallly like my old older cars more lately , 91 RS V8, 07 GT V8 (and 02 BMW E46 body. ) HP comp is fun to watch. I have had many GM vehicles and the Camaro has alot going for it but I am still leaning toward the Mustang 5.0 if I ever did look to a 11.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2010 | 09:11 AM
  #31  
David Young's Avatar
legacy Tms Member MEMORIAL Rest In Peace 10/06/2021
 
Joined: September 16, 2009
Posts: 3,381
Likes: 125
From: Clinton Tennessee
Isn't this the same Cadillac engine that has a bad vibration at a certain RPM, the g.m. engineers can't seem to get rid of ?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 04:37 AM
  #32  
Jinx's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Slims00ls1z28
Yep so far nothing official has come down the pipe.



I wouldn't be too begrudgen to it or think the GT500 is a slam dunk away from it. The GT500 is no lightweight by any means. And if I am not mistaken the 4 door CTS-V performs against it in just about every aspect quite well. A lighter version of it (CTS-V) should be able to hold it's own. It's not all about max HP, tq and weight. Gearing (the A6 1st gear is brutal) powerband etc all come into play and from what I remember the 6.2 puts out better under the curve numbers than the 4.6 mill. Reguardless of which is ultimately "faster" it would be a driver's race any day with those 2 in a hypothetical match up



Must be the area. Theres plenty out there. Many of the vendors on other sites posted pics of bays full of them getting all manner of mods. Most time you will probably see them at the track as I do with all the local termi's.


WASSUP Jinxy! welcome aboard!
Holy crap.... Slim. wassup. I havent heard from u since 5thgen.org or Modern Camaro. lol. Never thought I would see you on a stang site.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 09:08 AM
  #33  
MARZ's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Slims00ls1z28
I wouldn't be too begrudgen to it or think the GT500 is a slam dunk away from it. The GT500 is no lightweight by any means. And if I am not mistaken the 4 door CTS-V performs against it in just about every aspect quite well. A lighter version of it (CTS-V) should be able to hold it's own. It's not all about max HP, tq and weight. Gearing (the A6 1st gear is brutal) powerband etc all come into play and from what I remember the 6.2 puts out better under the curve numbers than the 4.6 mill. Reguardless of which is ultimately "faster" it would be a driver's race any day with those 2 in a hypothetical match up
I wonder how an AL-block GT500 will perform against the CTS-V? I bet Ford knows and, thus, they're going to announce this very car later this year.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 05:27 PM
  #34  
Q`res's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Originally Posted by thomasstang09
IMHO, the "Z/28" is a mythical white unicorn craping rainbows.
To be fair, a lot of people thought the same thing about the 'Blue Devil' Corvette (myself included), until it actually showed up as the ZR-1.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2010 | 11:08 PM
  #35  
Slims00ls1z28's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2007
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jinx
Holy crap.... Slim. wassup. I havent heard from u since 5thgen.org or Modern Camaro. lol. Never thought I would see you on a stang site.
Lol ya been a member here for a minute now. I'm still on 5thgen as well too. Somebody's gotta keep the knuckle draggers in here in check lol.

Originally Posted by MARZ
I wonder how an AL-block GT500 will perform against the CTS-V? I bet Ford knows and, thus, they're going to announce this very car later this year.
I'd hope that the sports car would outperform a 4 door sedan in every respect, but ya gotta admit they got the CTS-V right. I however wouldn't put hopes in a what 200 lb weight loss (or equivalent of 20 hp) for just an outright skull dragging. The LSA is quite potent from 2K rpm and up. Drivers races for sure.

Originally Posted by Q`res
To be fair, a lot of people thought the same thing about the 'Blue Devil' Corvette (myself included), until it actually showed up as the ZR-1.
True never looked at it like that and for the Z28 it is at least a planned ride rather than a planned concept however I'm still leary. I wish cuz that's what I want but not going to hold my breath on it.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 06:27 PM
  #36  
bt4's Avatar
bt4
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 25, 2004
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Marketing has always been about perception--'new and improved', 'biggest', 'fastest', 'most powerful', etc. I see no reason why GM shouldn't capitalize on the marketing potential of the Z/28 name. (Ford has been pretty successful in trading on the GT500 moniker.)

Having said that, and I may be in the minority, marketing is what the Z/28 would be about--selling the image. The GT500 has impressive performance numbers, but those numbers also come at a premium price. IMO, the Mustang GT offers better value (more bang-for-the-buck) than the GT500 does. I suspect a supercharged 551-HP, Cadillac-powered, Z/28 Camaro would simply be more of the same. It would, no doubt produce some impressive performance numbers, but at a considerable premium (the once unthinkable--a Camaro more expensive than a Corvette). I don't think anyone would be surprised if the 1SS/2SS Camaro, (like the Mustang GT) remained a better bang-for-the-buck deal.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 01:46 PM
  #37  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
http://blogs.insideline.com/straight...amaro-z28.html

Reply
Old Feb 20, 2010 | 12:17 AM
  #38  
Slims00ls1z28's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2007
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Hmm interesting. Face lift, or model lift. Just adds fuel to the fire. Crossing fingers that this is the equivalent to the "blue devil" of yore but not holding my breath just yet.

Just let me pay off the GTO first GM I really don't want to have to trade it in. . I am not planning on it but it's already hard passing by Chevy dealerships as it is.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2010 | 09:29 AM
  #39  
Moosetang's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Looks like the grill has a solid vertical element, perhaps they're trying to throw a little nod to Pontiac into their Camaro.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CiniZter
General Vehicle Discussion/News
25
Apr 28, 2016 05:41 PM
RedCandy5.0
General Vehicle Discussion/News
9
Oct 4, 2015 06:51 AM
50Cal
Introductions
6
Sep 17, 2015 06:43 PM
MRGTX
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
4
Sep 16, 2015 08:08 AM
TripleBlack14
GT350
3
Jul 30, 2015 02:31 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:10 AM.