0 to 60: 2013 Ford Mustang GT Gets Burned by Electric Car
#1
Shelby GT350 Member
Thread Starter
0 to 60: 2013 Ford Mustang GT Gets Burned by Electric Car
#2
When a Mustang costs more than $110,000 dollars and gets less than 200 miles on a tank of gas, this article won't be pure douchebaggery.
Who are you and why do you keep posting this meaningless crap?
Who are you and why do you keep posting this meaningless crap?
#3
Cobra Member
#4
It's pure science. If you direct wind an electric motor, it will put out an immense amount of instant power. Much more so than a gasoline engine. It will also reach a point where it is ungovernable and explode.
Last edited by 67Drewstang; 8/25/13 at 10:35 AM.
#5
http://jalopnik.com/5887265/tesla-mo...design-problem
http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/...ed_design.html
etc...
The problem isn't that electric cars are an emergent technology, full of teething problems. Electric cars have been around even BEFORE reciprocating engines. In reality, electric cars are based on snake oil and a flawed assumption, and each generation of automotive engineers rediscovers the laws of physics and what makes electric cars impractical/impossible.
There is no real new tech, here. Superconductivity might have some answers, but for now, electric remains on the moon for practical personal transportation.
http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/...ed_design.html
etc...
The problem isn't that electric cars are an emergent technology, full of teething problems. Electric cars have been around even BEFORE reciprocating engines. In reality, electric cars are based on snake oil and a flawed assumption, and each generation of automotive engineers rediscovers the laws of physics and what makes electric cars impractical/impossible.
There is no real new tech, here. Superconductivity might have some answers, but for now, electric remains on the moon for practical personal transportation.
#6
Cobra R Member
http://jalopnik.com/5887265/tesla-mo...design-problem
http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/...ed_design.html
etc...
The problem isn't that electric cars are an emergent technology, full of teething problems. Electric cars have been around even BEFORE reciprocating engines. In reality, electric cars are based on snake oil and a flawed assumption, and each generation of automotive engineers rediscovers the laws of physics and what makes electric cars impractical/impossible.
There is no real new tech, here. Superconductivity might have some answers, but for now, electric remains on the moon for practical personal transportation.
http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/...ed_design.html
etc...
The problem isn't that electric cars are an emergent technology, full of teething problems. Electric cars have been around even BEFORE reciprocating engines. In reality, electric cars are based on snake oil and a flawed assumption, and each generation of automotive engineers rediscovers the laws of physics and what makes electric cars impractical/impossible.
There is no real new tech, here. Superconductivity might have some answers, but for now, electric remains on the moon for practical personal transportation.
#7
Cobra R Member
#8
As to the ridiculous test, lets see what happens to the Tesla after a couple runs. I don't know how many full acceleration pulls a full charge has but the average Tesla anyone will run into on the street is likely to be in less than a full state of charge making real world stop light acceleration a risk for them not making it home for awhile.
#9
Cobra R Member
It should have never been an issue. The fact is Tesla Motors did not hire anyone with even basic knowledge of battery management for Li-Ion cells for such a mistake to have happened. This is really that basic. The BMS should have denied the car power.
As to the ridiculous test, lets see what happens to the Tesla after a couple runs. I don't know how many full acceleration pulls a full charge has but the average Tesla anyone will run into on the street is likely to be in less than a full state of charge making real world stop light acceleration a risk for them not making it home for awhile.
Last edited by Fenderaddict2; 8/28/13 at 07:42 PM.
#11
Cobra Member
Electric cars are clearly not at the level where they will soon take the place of internal combustion powered cars. Not even close.. Maybe someday but not yet
#14
FR500 Member
Join Date: December 9, 2011
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
plus they havnt been on the same track for development and research. Like the batteries themselves i think the movement is just waiting, charging. Just waitin to be unleashed on the world!
Thats the day i buy a 67-69 fastback, so i can say "Efffff CAFE standards!"
Thats the day i buy a 67-69 fastback, so i can say "Efffff CAFE standards!"
#15
Cobra Member
Join Date: February 12, 2010
Location: MA (north shore)
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carid
Vendor Showcase
0
7/20/15 06:26 AM