Midwest TMS'ers General Communication Thread
....
Friday, October 24, 2008
MANITOWOC, Wis. - A 36-year-old man took revenge on his roommate after she refused to have sex with him by allegedly urinating on her dog, police said. Police said the man was arrested early Thursday morning on tentative charges of criminal damage to property and disorderly conduct related to domestic violence.
According to police reports, the man was drunk when he argued with the woman. After she resisted his advances the man went to the basement where he urinated on her dog and the floor.
Police said the argument continued, and when the woman's sister stood up in defense the man pushed her into a wall. He then allegedly stormed from the home and punched out a window.
Friday, October 24, 2008 MANITOWOC, Wis. - A 36-year-old man took revenge on his roommate after she refused to have sex with him by allegedly urinating on her dog, police said. Police said the man was arrested early Thursday morning on tentative charges of criminal damage to property and disorderly conduct related to domestic violence.
According to police reports, the man was drunk when he argued with the woman. After she resisted his advances the man went to the basement where he urinated on her dog and the floor.
Police said the argument continued, and when the woman's sister stood up in defense the man pushed her into a wall. He then allegedly stormed from the home and punched out a window.
Hey tom...today I ran out of toilet paper at the house....Good thing I had your magazine Handy!
Legacy TMS Member





Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 6
From: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Legacy TMS Member





Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 6
From: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member





Joined: October 8, 2005
Posts: 12,395
Likes: 29
From: Medina county, OH
Thanks Cody...... I see you caught on to my new C/T, courtesy of SVOpaul.
Scott, yes you're correct there are probably 2 or maybe even 3 errors in the article. I wish they woulda contacted me to proof read it. The car is an 06, not an 05 like it states. I believe it also says that I have Steeda LCAs on the front suspension, which is not possible- they're on the rear suspension. But anyway.......
Scott, yes you're correct there are probably 2 or maybe even 3 errors in the article. I wish they woulda contacted me to proof read it. The car is an 06, not an 05 like it states. I believe it also says that I have Steeda LCAs on the front suspension, which is not possible- they're on the rear suspension. But anyway.......



Us
But I thought you had a 06 not an 05 as stated in the article.
Finally cut the corn around here so I didn't start 900 acres on fire.