2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

vid of 05 running the 1/4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7/30/04, 11:30 AM
  #21  
GT Member
 
Piston NV's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 16, 2004
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
doesn't the auto have 3.55 gears?
Old 7/30/04, 11:33 AM
  #22  
Bullitt Member
 
USA-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 5, 2004
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He confirmed its an auto which is pretty darn good
I saw an 02 Vert run a 13.8 stock. That's not exactly impressive from a coupe. Granted they may have had better conditions, but 14s still stink. This car is going to be a laughing stock with Camaro guys. It doesn't help that most of the guys I know think the car looks ugly too. I wish Ford wouldn't keep adding weight to their cars. The F-150 gets terrible gas mileage and weighs a ton .. but it has 300 hp. Weight stinks.
Old 7/30/04, 11:47 AM
  #23  
Bullitt Member
 
dallasw77's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 28, 2004
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im sorry but this car is not ugly, I have Gm friends and they even like how this car looks. Ohh well maybe some are jealous but everyone has their opinion!
Old 7/30/04, 12:01 PM
  #24  
Bullitt Member
 
USA-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 5, 2004
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dallasw77: I agree with you man .. but you gotta remember I'm a teenager. Most teenagers are bone heads who don't like it because it's retro. They're rather see a riced out piece of crap .. sad, but true. Luckily most of those teenage boneheads can't afford a car that costs that much anyways, so they are not the target market.
Old 7/30/04, 12:16 PM
  #25  
Mach 1 Member
 
Shea's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 24, 2004
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manual should be anywhere from 3 to 7 tenths quicker than a stock auto, so that would put the manual at 13.5 to 13.9. No complaints about that.
Old 7/30/04, 12:26 PM
  #26  
Member
 
bdunosk's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 27, 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quicktime Alternative, for all of you who hate how Apple's QT hijacks your computer.

Old 7/30/04, 01:03 PM
  #27  
Mach 1 Member
 
Shea's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 24, 2004
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by USA-Adam@July 30, 2004, 11:36 AM
This car is going to be a laughing stock with Camaro guys.
Camaro guys? What's a Camaro? Who makes that car this year?

It's pretty soon in the game to say it's going to be a laughing stock when they aren't even out yet.
Old 7/30/04, 01:03 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
CUON24's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 26, 2004
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
two things that i dont like abou this video 1) We never get a shot of the time...we take his word for it. Milan is known for not having the E.T.'s up...there always broken down. 2) Is it just me or was that a lame launch...i would love to see the reaction time.. ...i was however impressed in how quick the car got going. I have no doubt this is a mid-13 car.
Old 7/30/04, 01:07 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
CUON24's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 26, 2004
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i just looked at the video again and he wasnt even staged properly...watch the tree as well...that was a bad run all together
Old 7/30/04, 01:40 PM
  #30  
Bullitt Member
 
tangs3's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 7, 2004
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
14.2 for an automatic is good, try the current car with automatic it probably high 14s may be low 15s.
Old 7/30/04, 01:53 PM
  #31  
Bullitt Member
 
Highlander's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 14, 2004
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From MM & FF Magazine.

2004 Mustang GT w/ Automatic Trans, stock.
Weight w/ driver 3,590

(best) 14.095 @ 96.64 mph
Old 7/30/04, 02:13 PM
  #32  
GT Member
 
PaperTarget's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2004
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ugh, I can already see the bad replies on the Camaro boards now...they're already making crap up regardless of reality. Anyone have any better info on this vid?
Old 7/30/04, 02:43 PM
  #33  
Cobra Member
 
Amy V6's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 3, 2004
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was first on MustangWorld

Links

http://www.mustangworld.com/forums/showthr...threadid=220375
http://www.mustangworld.com/forums/showthr...threadid=220395
Old 7/30/04, 03:03 PM
  #34  
GT Member
 
gw186's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 9, 2004
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did I see brake lights on the other car? was he slowing up or just bumped the peddal
Old 7/30/04, 03:38 PM
  #35  
After all these years,
My C/T still sucks!
 
EleanorsMine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 5, 2004
Location: Orlando(DP!) Florida
Posts: 7,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sooooooooooo which one won? I saw the non 05 pull ahead....
Old 7/30/04, 03:40 PM
  #36  
Bullitt Member
 
t69r00p69's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 1, 2004
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know why you guys are trying to defend this run... 14.2 is a shame and at only 96mph What a serious let down after all this hype.
Old 7/30/04, 03:44 PM
  #37  
Bullitt Member
 
dallasw77's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 28, 2004
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As soon as I get my GT I will let you all know how it does at the California Speedway 1/4 track. We will see then how it does!!!
Old 7/30/04, 03:55 PM
  #38  
Cobra Member
 
Dr Iven's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2004
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh my goodness!

You guys complaining about that run are so easily set in your ways! Even an Enzo can run a 14.2@96!! That doesn't mean that's ALL it can run. Another example is that Michael Jordan can dunk on rim adjusted to 8', but does that mean that he can't dunk on a 10' or even 11' rim?? NO!!

If you are basing your opinion of how quick this car is on ONE run from ONE person in an AUTO car where we didn't even SEE the ET, don't buy one!! That'll leave more on the lot for those of us who don't only see the car for its speed, but for its appearance as well as its new platform and awesome interior!

Sheesh...
Old 7/30/04, 03:58 PM
  #39  
GT Member
 
legendlimetime's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 13, 2004
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE]I don't know why you guys are trying to defend this run... 14.2 is a shame and at only 96mph What a serious let down after all this hype.

Posts like this are ridiculous! Were you driving the car? If not, how can you say what a let down? Without way more information, this video is useless as a barometer for the 2005 Mustang's performance!

This is not in defense of this car just defense of common sense.
Old 7/30/04, 03:59 PM
  #40  
GT Member
 
gw186's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 9, 2004
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the other forum he said it was a 5 speed and also said -

"I've got a second video of the same 05 mustang running a 14.8 but I didn't yell out the mph, and I don't remember it. The 14.8 run was before the 14.2 run."

I think the driver just stinked.


Quick Reply: vid of 05 running the 1/4



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM.