2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

vid of 05 running the 1/4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 11:30 AM
  #21  
Piston NV's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: July 16, 2004
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
doesn't the auto have 3.55 gears?
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 11:33 AM
  #22  
USA-Adam's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 5, 2004
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
He confirmed its an auto which is pretty darn good
I saw an 02 Vert run a 13.8 stock. That's not exactly impressive from a coupe. Granted they may have had better conditions, but 14s still stink. This car is going to be a laughing stock with Camaro guys. It doesn't help that most of the guys I know think the car looks ugly too. I wish Ford wouldn't keep adding weight to their cars. The F-150 gets terrible gas mileage and weighs a ton .. but it has 300 hp. Weight stinks.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 11:47 AM
  #23  
dallasw77's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 28, 2004
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Im sorry but this car is not ugly, I have Gm friends and they even like how this car looks. Ohh well maybe some are jealous but everyone has their opinion!
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 12:01 PM
  #24  
USA-Adam's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 5, 2004
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
dallasw77: I agree with you man .. but you gotta remember I'm a teenager. Most teenagers are bone heads who don't like it because it's retro. They're rather see a riced out piece of crap .. sad, but true. Luckily most of those teenage boneheads can't afford a car that costs that much anyways, so they are not the target market.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 12:16 PM
  #25  
Shea's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 24, 2004
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Manual should be anywhere from 3 to 7 tenths quicker than a stock auto, so that would put the manual at 13.5 to 13.9. No complaints about that.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 12:26 PM
  #26  
bdunosk's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: June 27, 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Quicktime Alternative, for all of you who hate how Apple's QT hijacks your computer.

Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 01:03 PM
  #27  
Shea's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 24, 2004
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Originally posted by USA-Adam@July 30, 2004, 11:36 AM
This car is going to be a laughing stock with Camaro guys.
Camaro guys? What's a Camaro? Who makes that car this year?

It's pretty soon in the game to say it's going to be a laughing stock when they aren't even out yet.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 01:03 PM
  #28  
CUON24's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: February 26, 2004
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
two things that i dont like abou this video 1) We never get a shot of the time...we take his word for it. Milan is known for not having the E.T.'s up...there always broken down. 2) Is it just me or was that a lame launch...i would love to see the reaction time.. ...i was however impressed in how quick the car got going. I have no doubt this is a mid-13 car.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 01:07 PM
  #29  
CUON24's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: February 26, 2004
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
i just looked at the video again and he wasnt even staged properly...watch the tree as well...that was a bad run all together
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 01:40 PM
  #30  
tangs3's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 7, 2004
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
14.2 for an automatic is good, try the current car with automatic it probably high 14s may be low 15s.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 01:53 PM
  #31  
Highlander's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 14, 2004
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From MM & FF Magazine.

2004 Mustang GT w/ Automatic Trans, stock.
Weight w/ driver 3,590

(best) 14.095 @ 96.64 mph
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 02:13 PM
  #32  
PaperTarget's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 2, 2004
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Ugh, I can already see the bad replies on the Camaro boards now...they're already making crap up regardless of reality. Anyone have any better info on this vid?
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 02:43 PM
  #33  
Amy V6's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: April 3, 2004
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
It was first on MustangWorld

Links

http://www.mustangworld.com/forums/showthr...threadid=220375
http://www.mustangworld.com/forums/showthr...threadid=220395
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 03:03 PM
  #34  
gw186's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 9, 2004
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Did I see brake lights on the other car? was he slowing up or just bumped the peddal
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 03:38 PM
  #35  
EleanorsMine's Avatar
After all these years,
My C/T still sucks!
 
Joined: May 5, 2004
Posts: 7,190
Likes: 0
From: Orlando(DP!) Florida
Sooooooooooo which one won? I saw the non 05 pull ahead....
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 03:40 PM
  #36  
t69r00p69's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 1, 2004
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
I don't know why you guys are trying to defend this run... 14.2 is a shame and at only 96mph What a serious let down after all this hype.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 03:44 PM
  #37  
dallasw77's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 28, 2004
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
As soon as I get my GT I will let you all know how it does at the California Speedway 1/4 track. We will see then how it does!!!
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 03:55 PM
  #38  
Dr Iven's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Oh my goodness!

You guys complaining about that run are so easily set in your ways! Even an Enzo can run a 14.2@96!! That doesn't mean that's ALL it can run. Another example is that Michael Jordan can dunk on rim adjusted to 8', but does that mean that he can't dunk on a 10' or even 11' rim?? NO!!

If you are basing your opinion of how quick this car is on ONE run from ONE person in an AUTO car where we didn't even SEE the ET, don't buy one!! That'll leave more on the lot for those of us who don't only see the car for its speed, but for its appearance as well as its new platform and awesome interior!

Sheesh...
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 03:58 PM
  #39  
legendlimetime's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: July 13, 2004
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
[QUOTE]I don't know why you guys are trying to defend this run... 14.2 is a shame and at only 96mph What a serious let down after all this hype.

Posts like this are ridiculous! Were you driving the car? If not, how can you say what a let down? Without way more information, this video is useless as a barometer for the 2005 Mustang's performance!

This is not in defense of this car just defense of common sense.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2004 | 03:59 PM
  #40  
gw186's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 9, 2004
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From the other forum he said it was a 5 speed and also said -

"I've got a second video of the same 05 mustang running a 14.8 but I didn't yell out the mph, and I don't remember it. The 14.8 run was before the 14.2 run."

I think the driver just stinked.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:50 AM.