2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Is this true? 7 Horsepower?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2/27/06, 07:39 AM
  #1  
Team Mustang Source
Thread Starter
 
Pitch Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 9, 2005
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"Pony Gets Power and Punch

The 3.8-liter 90-degree pushrod engine that has long been standard in the Mustang has been replaced with a new 4.0-liter, 60-degree, single-overhead-cam (SOHC) V6. The new 6-cylinder provides a boost of 7 horsepower to 200, and an extra 10 foot-pounds of torque, to 235 lb-ft, than its predecessor."
A Review from : http://car-reviews.automobile.com/Ford/rev...ew-update/940/1
Is this statement true, I thought we got more horses than just 7?
Old 2/27/06, 07:59 AM
  #2  
V6 Member
 
ShadowGray's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 11, 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yes, my '03 V-6 Mustang was 193HP, and 225Lb/Ft Torque, but you had to flog the heck out of it to get the 193HP, or at least it sounded like you were flogging it.

The interesting thing is that my wife's 98 Windstar 3.8 V-6, with 200HP and 240Tq, the same as the 4.0.
Old 2/27/06, 08:03 AM
  #3  
Bullitt Member
 
JustFord0099's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 19, 2005
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my stock 99 V6 made 170hp/188ft lb on the dyno.
Old 2/27/06, 08:08 AM
  #4  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
That should be 17hp

193+17 = 210
not just 200hp in the V6

Also I think the Torque is 245 not 235
Old 2/27/06, 08:12 AM
  #5  
Mach 1 Member
 
MusicMan66's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 17, 2005
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The numbers I've seen for the 4.0L is 210hp/240tq. Also the 3.8L in the 99-04 the numbers were 190hp/225tq. Anyone correct me if I'm wrong here...
Old 2/27/06, 08:34 AM
  #6  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
it was 190 (then 193/225)
was for the 3.8 and then it was rebadged the 3.9 with same ratings in 2004.

210/240 sounds right for the 4.0
Old 2/27/06, 10:31 AM
  #7  
Cobra Member
 
vistablue mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,351
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Boomer @ February 27, 2006, 10:37 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
it was 190 (then 193/225)
was for the 3.8 and then it was rebadged the 3.9 with same ratings in 2004.

210/240 sounds right for the 4.0
[/b][/quote]

This would be the correct information. People have said ALOT of things that are wrong in reviews.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
09-gt/cs
GT Performance Mods
9
10/15/15 10:03 AM
CoyotePremium13
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
11
10/7/15 07:17 PM
AdPock
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
9/22/15 05:55 PM
mustangsally_
2010-2014 Mustang
21
9/18/15 05:35 AM



Quick Reply: Is this true? 7 Horsepower?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:21 AM.