2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Is this true? 7 Horsepower?

Old Feb 27, 2006 | 07:39 AM
  #1  
Pitch Black's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 9, 2005
Posts: 405
Likes: 1
"Pony Gets Power and Punch

The 3.8-liter 90-degree pushrod engine that has long been standard in the Mustang has been replaced with a new 4.0-liter, 60-degree, single-overhead-cam (SOHC) V6. The new 6-cylinder provides a boost of 7 horsepower to 200, and an extra 10 foot-pounds of torque, to 235 lb-ft, than its predecessor."
A Review from : http://car-reviews.automobile.com/Ford/rev...ew-update/940/1
Is this statement true, I thought we got more horses than just 7?
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 07:59 AM
  #2  
ShadowGray's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: October 11, 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 2
Yes, my '03 V-6 Mustang was 193HP, and 225Lb/Ft Torque, but you had to flog the heck out of it to get the 193HP, or at least it sounded like you were flogging it.

The interesting thing is that my wife's 98 Windstar 3.8 V-6, with 200HP and 240Tq, the same as the 4.0.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 08:03 AM
  #3  
JustFord0099's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 19, 2005
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
my stock 99 V6 made 170hp/188ft lb on the dyno.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 08:08 AM
  #4  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
That should be 17hp

193+17 = 210
not just 200hp in the V6

Also I think the Torque is 245 not 235
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 08:12 AM
  #5  
MusicMan66's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 17, 2005
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
The numbers I've seen for the 4.0L is 210hp/240tq. Also the 3.8L in the 99-04 the numbers were 190hp/225tq. Anyone correct me if I'm wrong here...
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 08:34 AM
  #6  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
it was 190 (then 193/225)
was for the 3.8 and then it was rebadged the 3.9 with same ratings in 2004.

210/240 sounds right for the 4.0
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 10:31 AM
  #7  
vistablue mustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2005
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 1
From: NJ
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Boomer @ February 27, 2006, 10:37 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
it was 190 (then 193/225)
was for the 3.8 and then it was rebadged the 3.9 with same ratings in 2004.

210/240 sounds right for the 4.0
[/b][/quote]

This would be the correct information. People have said ALOT of things that are wrong in reviews.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
09-gt/cs
GT Performance Mods
9
Oct 15, 2015 10:03 AM
CoyotePremium13
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
11
Oct 7, 2015 07:17 PM
AdPock
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 22, 2015 05:55 PM
mustangsally_
2010-2014 Mustang
21
Sep 18, 2015 05:35 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:30 AM.