The New Mach 1
Big Falken Tires
Joined: October 17, 2004
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Steve @ February 8, 2006, 12:38 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Yeah, I saw that it was part of that article but who knows? I had my info before I even saw that piece but I did think it was interesting.
[/b][/quote]
Hey that's cool man - I just want a new Mach 1 so we can have the ACTUAL car to debate about!
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/04.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
Yeah, I saw that it was part of that article but who knows? I had my info before I even saw that piece but I did think it was interesting.
[/b][/quote]
Hey that's cool man - I just want a new Mach 1 so we can have the ACTUAL car to debate about!
[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/04.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
Shelby GT350 Member
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(kevinb120 @ February 7, 2006, 11:57 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I just don't see the 4.6 dohc as being that big a power increase over the 3v if its NA. It is aluminum though. I would still bet on the 5.4 NA, more bang for the buck.
[/b][/quote]
The 4.6L 3V is all aluminum too.
The 4V could be tuned for more HP, maybe 30 more peak HP than the 3V, but it would be difficult to get more torque out of the 4V vs the 3V.
However there is still more HP to be had out of the 3V.
I just don't see the 4.6 dohc as being that big a power increase over the 3v if its NA. It is aluminum though. I would still bet on the 5.4 NA, more bang for the buck.
[/b][/quote]
The 4.6L 3V is all aluminum too.
The 4V could be tuned for more HP, maybe 30 more peak HP than the 3V, but it would be difficult to get more torque out of the 4V vs the 3V.
However there is still more HP to be had out of the 3V.
Bullitt Member
Joined: August 13, 2005
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(JeffreyDJ @ February 8, 2006, 1:07 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I would MUCH rather see a 5.4 N/A in the Mach as opposed to the 4.6 DOHC S/C ... Just my two cents..
[/b][/quote]
Add my two cents to this one. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
I would MUCH rather see a 5.4 N/A in the Mach as opposed to the 4.6 DOHC S/C ... Just my two cents..
[/b][/quote]
Add my two cents to this one. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
Mach 1 Member
Joined: January 1, 2005
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Florida
I have been theorizing that the blown 4.6 terminator would be used in an upcoming SE for some time, but I was thinking it would end up in a Boss, if made...
Guess I missed the mark on that one...
the potential of the 4.6 terminator means that a ~$30K SE could easily compete with a stock $40+ GT500, without the fear of damaging collectability...
oh yeah
EDIT: Oh yeah, and personally I would much prefer the forged internals of the terminator than an NA 5.4 with stock and fra-gee-lay internals...my .02
Guess I missed the mark on that one...
the potential of the 4.6 terminator means that a ~$30K SE could easily compete with a stock $40+ GT500, without the fear of damaging collectability...
oh yeah
EDIT: Oh yeah, and personally I would much prefer the forged internals of the terminator than an NA 5.4 with stock and fra-gee-lay internals...my .02
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scothew
Curated Content Articles 71-73 Youtube & Photo Gallery
2
Aug 17, 2023 02:11 PM