2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Motorcraft 20w50; Castrol 20w50

Old Nov 8, 2004 | 12:10 PM
  #21  
Kluski's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 23, 2004
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 9
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally posted by TomServo92@November 8, 2004, 10:43 AM

According to the Mobil 1 spec sheet:

Click Here

0W20 is the grade of M1 that is recommended as equivalent to 5W20.
It said it is the equivalent to 5W20, but it also states:

"Mobil 1 0W-20 is the ideal product for high revolution and output four and six cylinder cars where a 0W-20 or 5W-20 viscosity lubricant is recommended."

and

"Mobil 1 0W-20 is recommended for all types of modern vehicles, especially high-performance turbo-charged 4 and 6 cylinder gasoline..."


It does not mention 8 cylinders. Any thoughts?
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2004 | 12:17 PM
  #22  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally posted by Kluski+November 8, 2004, 1:13 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Kluski @ November 8, 2004, 1:13 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-TomServo92@November 8, 2004, 10:43 AM

According to the Mobil 1 spec sheet:

Click Here

0W20 is the grade of M1 that is recommended as equivalent to 5W20.
It said it is the equivalent to 5W20, but it also states:

"Mobil 1 0W-20 is the ideal product for high revolution and output four and six cylinder cars where a 0W-20 or 5W-20 viscosity lubricant is recommended."

and

"Mobil 1 0W-20 is recommended for all types of modern vehicles, especially high-performance turbo-charged 4 and 6 cylinder gasoline..."


It does not mention 8 cylinders. Any thoughts? [/b][/quote]
My thoughts (and I could be wrong) is that if it's good enough for the small, high-revving engines, it ought to be good enough for the 4.6, especially if Ford has specified 5W20. I can't see any reason why it wouldn't be OK as long as it meets Fords specs.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2004 | 05:48 PM
  #23  
ponyboy66's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 13, 2004
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Kluski+November 8, 2004, 1:13 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Kluski @ November 8, 2004, 1:13 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-TomServo92@November 8, 2004, 10:43 AM

According to the Mobil 1 spec sheet:

Click Here

0W20 is the grade of M1 that is recommended as equivalent to 5W20.
It said it is the equivalent to 5W20, but it also states:

"Mobil 1 0W-20 is the ideal product for high revolution and output four and six cylinder cars where a 0W-20 or 5W-20 viscosity lubricant is recommended."

and

"Mobil 1 0W-20 is recommended for all types of modern vehicles, especially high-performance turbo-charged 4 and 6 cylinder gasoline..."


It does not mention 8 cylinders. Any thoughts?[/b][/quote]
That's what I'm looking into. I'll let everyone know what I find.
In my professional opinion I would say no matter how many cyliders. The oil either flows or it doesn't. one or ten. No difference just more oil capacity.
I found a site a few months ago that is doing some extended interval testing on synthetics.
It's very interesting.

http://neptune.spacebears.com/cars/s.../oil-life.html
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2004 | 06:40 PM
  #24  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
We've covered this before, but DO NOT put in oil that is heavier than the recommended 5w20. There are reports of 2004 F-150 owners who have fried their 5.4L 3V, VVT mechanisms by putting in oil that is too heavy.

Use Motorcraft 5w20 syn blend, Motorcraft 5w20 full syn, or Mobil 1 0w20.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 10:12 PM
  #25  
woody1's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 12, 2004
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Originally posted by ponyboy66@November 8, 2004, 5:00 AM
It's mobil1 hands down.
0W-20.
This oil is far superior to any mineral based oil.
It's hard to believe that the argument still lives.
The only other oil that is even close is AMSOIL (I hate to admit)
The synthetics have a much better detergent package, much better anti wear package, fine particle suspension for filtration, 0 viscosity breakdown between oil changes, better heat transfer, less common oil contaminants and on and on not to mention increased interval change time. I have been running Mobil1 for 20 years.
The extra cost by far pays for itself in performance and durability.
I have had several vehicles go 150k, 160k to 180k miles with little oil usage and 0 burning. Mobil1 in the long run is very friendly to the seals.
You will see no leaking like you will with a mineral base over time.
Dan, with all due respect. You can use factory oils is you please, but you will still get much much better performance with a synthetic. Mobil1 is fully API certified and exceeds ALL manufacturer specs, by far.
I am seeking some data from some Mobil engineers that I know on the comparisons of the 0W-20 and 5W-20 arguement. Mobil1's websit lists the 0W-20 as an alternative to the 5W-20. My 2 cents. I have used oil base stocks and synthetics over my entire career from hydraulics, transmission, compressor, gear, grease, etc. It's just one guys life experience. It's Mobil1 0W-20 for me.
B) Ditto Ponyboy66.
I had several high mileage vehicle (700,000; 550,000, 210,000, several 150-200K range). My current main driver is 4 years old with only 172,000 and expect to keep it till at least 400,000. Every vehicle was weened of dino fluid withing the 1st 3,000 miles.

I'll change oil at 1,000 miles with motorcraft (free dealer oil change) and then at the 5, 000 mile mark. From them on it will be Mobil 1 5W-20 every 6-8,000 miles.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mackitude
2010-2014 Mustang
6
Aug 13, 2015 01:05 PM
metroplex
GT Performance Mods
11
Feb 27, 2007 01:39 AM
jbailer
2005-2009 Mustang
24
Jan 4, 2007 02:08 AM
jbailer
2005-2009 Mustang
20
Jan 2, 2007 05:23 PM
jbailer
2005-2009 Mustang
25
Oct 27, 2006 06:00 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:02 PM.