2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Eye openers from Kenne bell

Old Sep 20, 2009 | 12:03 AM
  #1  
bluethunderhorse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 30, 2007
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 2
From: Summerville GA
Eye openers from Kenne bell

have to say Kenne Bell does the most extensive dyno testing in the aftermarket
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
05_3VgtTechTips.pdf (416.3 KB, 1619 views)
File Type: pdf
File Type: pdf
MustangCatalyticConverters.pdf (130.0 KB, 378 views)
File Type: pdf
HotAirWARNING.pdf (71.6 KB, 313 views)

Last edited by bluethunderhorse; Sep 20, 2009 at 12:11 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #2  
Americanboy86's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: August 26, 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: TX
Wow, that's some great information. The extensive testing really makes me confident in Kenne Bell.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 12:24 PM
  #3  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Good stuff!
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 02:19 PM
  #4  
bluethunderhorse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 30, 2007
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 2
From: Summerville GA
Only 2hp from changing from 100% stock exhaust to full race exhaust on a 800hp car who would have ever thought
Kenne Bell is the s/c of choice for me I do a lot of back road adventures and power from the bottom up is what I need not the high end punch of a centrifugal

Last edited by bluethunderhorse; Sep 20, 2009 at 02:22 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #5  
ford4v429's Avatar
legacy Tms Member
 
Joined: October 9, 2005
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 77
From: N.E. Ohio
says a lot about Ford's cast iron manifolds and production cats huh? guess maybe they didnt leave much room for improvement, despite what many ads claim.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 04:36 PM
  #6  
825LTRGT's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2008
Posts: 844
Likes: 7
From: Midwest
Any ideas if there would be a similar lack of gain in an NA car?

KB siad that the Bassani Cat back gained some.

2 HP for headers and "Hi Flow" cats don't seem worth it.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 05:26 PM
  #7  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by bluethunderhorse
Only 2hp from changing from 100% stock exhaust to full race exhaust on a 800hp car who would have ever thought
Kenne Bell is the s/c of choice for me I do a lot of back road adventures and power from the bottom up is what I need not the high end punch of a centrifugal
As I understand it the log manifolds flow pretty well, but offer next to nothing when it comes to the resonant tuning advantages of a properly desinged header in the low to mid-range area.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 06:16 PM
  #8  
krnpimpsta's Avatar
 
Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC Metro Area
Hey, interesting reads.. can't seem to open the MustangCatalyticConverters.pdf...
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 06:28 PM
  #9  
The Reverend's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 28, 2006
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
We need more information about the Bassani mufflers.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2009 | 06:31 PM
  #10  
krnpimpsta's Avatar
 
Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC Metro Area
Originally Posted by krnpimpsta
Hey, interesting reads.. can't seem to open the MustangCatalyticConverters.pdf...
Nevermind.. I was so intrigued that I searched around and found them here: http://www.kennebell.net/techinfo/techinfo-ford.htm

Very interesting.. I'm not sure if I believe (or want to believe) it all. I took my cats out a few months ago and I thought I felt a minor change - maybe not though

One thing I find a little suspicious in Kenne Bell's articles is that their re-test numbers are always exactly the same. I.e., they keep changing parts and each run keeps producing exactly "775hp." I was under the impression that dyno runs will often change by several HP between runs, even if you change nothing... did they leave out slight variations to make the point easier to comprehend for most readers? Or are the numbers fabricated/lies? Or does their dyno setup produce results with under 0.1% error? (You would need around as low as 0.1% error in order to consistently see the same HP figure when you're up in the 700's.)

Last edited by krnpimpsta; Sep 20, 2009 at 06:32 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 04:17 PM
  #11  
1trickpony's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
I've always used Jim Bell as a baseline for numbers. He has the most scientific method of testing and documenting changes. I trust his assessment of non-competing products. In other words, I'm very confident in his evaluation of exhaust systems but I would take a closer look at discussions regarding other superchargers.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 05:53 PM
  #12  
tom281's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 8, 2005
Posts: 12,395
Likes: 29
From: Medina county, OH
I don't put faith in the exhaust numbers at all. I know of many, probably dozens of people that have showed solid gains when switching to long tube headers. Any in my own experience, I gained around 8hp when swapping from the factory mid pipe to an offroad H pipe, without changing the tune. And that was when I was NA, not blown. But anyway, KB still makes great blowers LOL..... Maybe they're trying to justify the reasoning to save your money on exhaust improvements in order to buy their expensive blowers. A kit for my 2003 Mach 1 goes for $6700 on their site last time I checked.

Last edited by tom281; Sep 22, 2009 at 05:56 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 08:36 PM
  #13  
crescent_wrench's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
From: Wake County, NC
Why do blowers cost so much?....seems like an awful lot of money for the technology and materials involved. $5000-$7500?
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 08:40 PM
  #14  
07S197's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Man Cans
 
Joined: August 20, 2007
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 2
From: Massachusetts
I think it is all in the precision of the rotors, a lot of R&D is needed to get them correct. Also in a roots/twin screw you are also getting a complete new intake manifold. Plus raw materials, the majority if twin screw & roots systems are milled out of a solid block of material. Centri systems can be quite more cost effective in comparison.

Last edited by 07S197; Sep 22, 2009 at 08:43 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2009 | 09:51 PM
  #15  
06GT's Avatar
 
Joined: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 6
This info has been on his (Bell's) site for over 2 years.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 07:23 PM
  #16  
Dixie_Flatline's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 16, 2007
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: West Chicago
Very interesting reading.

One problem with their methodology that conveniently works in their marketing favor, is they don't like the compound mods, like headers+cams. Our cars have a great balance on power when stock, the problem with that is to see noticeable gains, intake+exhast work needs to be balanced. If what KB says is true, what's the point of staying N/A, because according to K/B you won't get any gains unless you go F/I.

What I do know, is if I ever go F/I, it'll be with a KB blower. That said, I don't believe everything I read.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 09:52 PM
  #17  
NastyStang113's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 24, 2009
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
I can't believe anyone buy into that BS he spews onto his website. No gains from long tube headers? Interesting. I guess all of the guys that can 20-35 rwhp in S197s must be crazy. Everyone who has gained 5 rwhp from just getting rid of the cats with a o/r x pipe must be crazy, too.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 10:16 PM
  #18  
bluethunderhorse's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 30, 2007
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 2
From: Summerville GA
Originally Posted by NastyStang113
I can't believe anyone buy into that BS he spews onto his website. No gains from long tube headers? Interesting. I guess all of the guys that can 20-35 rwhp in S197s must be crazy. Everyone who has gained 5 rwhp from just getting rid of the cats with a o/r x pipe must be crazy, too.
did you join just to get that off your chest
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2009 | 07:28 AM
  #19  
Dixie_Flatline's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 16, 2007
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: West Chicago
Originally Posted by bluethunderhorse
did you join just to get that off your chest
No, he's been around a while, lost his account from the backup failure earlier this month. And he makes a valid point. KB's motives are highly suspect with their report: they only sell superchargers, they don't sell exhaust systems or camshafts or reworked heads or valvetrains. So if their report flies in the face of a lot of people's real daily findings with those products... well... stinky cow dung is stinky cow dung. I still love their blowers, but marketing crap like this can give even good products a bad taste if they're not careful.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kponypower
GT
13
Jun 17, 2020 07:17 AM
RCooke08GT
2005-2009 Mustang
9
Feb 19, 2017 03:03 AM
Cobiecane
5.0L GT Modifications
21
Oct 23, 2015 08:44 AM
tj@steeda
Auto Shows and Events
0
Sep 30, 2015 07:02 PM
exgto
2012-2013 BOSS 302
5
Sep 28, 2015 07:39 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 AM.