2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

design changes for 06 mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 10:30 AM
  #21  
CP94GT's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: August 31, 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
I think there is visually no difference between the 94 and 95 Mustangs.
As far as I know there is only one very small difference between the '94
and '95 mustangs. The lower trim panel right behind the front tires curves
up on the '95 to '98 mustangs, where on the '94's it is the same shape as
the rest of the lower trim / ground effects stuff.

The change was made at the begining of the '95 model year, so there are
a few '95 running around without the newer trim pieces but not many.

The part I found to be really funny was they used the same pictures in the
brochures for both the '94 and '95 mustangs, but you could tell the pictures
for the '94 had been doctored around the front wheel wells so this trim
piece didn't curve up. So if I had to guess I would say that the '94's were
caused by a mistake somewhere in production, and instead of correcting
the problem, they hid it and just used the new parts when they ran out of
the old ones.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 01:24 PM
  #22  
daniel94's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
And don't forget that the '95 GTs started having the bottom portion of the rear bumper blacked out, while the '94 GTs rear bumper was all body color. B)
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 08:08 PM
  #23  
CP94GT's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: August 31, 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
And don't forget that the '95 GTs started having the bottom portion of the rear bumper blacked out, while the '94 GTs rear bumper was all body color.
Yeah, if the bottom of '94 Gt bumper isn't black it's been painted.

Sorry to break that to you.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 09:23 PM
  #24  
wjones14's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: Niantic CT
Originally posted by Kahdir+January 20, 2005, 10:22 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Kahdir @ January 20, 2005, 10:22 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-wjones14@January 19, 2005, 7:01 PM
I think there is visually no difference between the 94 and 95 Mustangs.
Are your taillights Vertical or Horizontal? [/b][/quote]
tail lights are horizontal on 94-95. vertical on 96-98, yes?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 10:52 AM
  #25  
CP94GT's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: August 31, 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
tail lights are horizontal on 94-95. vertical on 96-98, yes?
You are correct, 94-95 have horizontal tail lights, and 96-98 were
vertical.

Also the rear C-scoups (behind the doors, in-front of the rear tires)
were functional on the 94-95 mustangs and were not on the 96-98's
I'm not sure about the vents in the hood, I think they were functional
in the 94-95's as well, but it's been too long for me to remember.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 11:15 AM
  #26  
MustangDan's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 16, 2004
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
I'd like to see everything behind the grill be painted black, I hate how the body color peeks thought the grill behind the pony.

That is the one mod I'll be making on ours when we get it.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #27  
mav's Avatar
mav
GT Member
 
Joined: October 19, 2004
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2005 | 02:01 PM
  #28  
Shifter1's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: December 10, 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
They've got to add a sunroof. All the performance competition has them. And heaters for the leather seats. Sitting on cold leather when it's minus 21, like it is here in Ottawa today, is an awful experience, let me tell you.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jim74656
SN95 Mustang
8
May 1, 2023 02:15 AM
trackpack13gt
2010-2014 Mustang
14
Aug 8, 2015 11:23 AM
carid
Vendor Showcase
3
Jul 17, 2015 05:40 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:06 PM.