2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

Any new info on Silverstar Ultras for us?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1/8/08, 09:35 AM
  #21  
Cobra Member
 
RRRoamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 27, 2004
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by metroplex
By making the filament burn brighter, you are reducing the life.
Given that they are producing 4000k color temp and (as you stated previously) producing the same light output as their standard 3100K bulbs, then it looks like they are buring the filament brighter and filtering out some of the reds and yellow wave lengths.

I'm fine with that. In the aquarium world, we have the problem of getting the color temp UP without losing too much light output. Of course, most of us are shooting for 10000k to 15000k and very high power output (I had 1200 watts of metal halide lights on my last 240 gallon reef tank. Yes, the electric bill sucked!), so it's not quite the same thing.

The reason I'm fine with that is because our eyes work best with light that approaches normal daylight conditions. That is what they were designed/evolved for (pick your personal school of thought). So, if they can get the light output to be the same while pushing the color temp up closer to the 6000K or so level, then your eyes are going to be able to use that light more effectively. And that translates to "see things better".

The HID folks that are putting in 10000K and 12000K bulbs have gone "over the mountain". There is no WAY those bulbs can maintain the same light output as the 4000K (or 6000K) HID bulbs at that color temp AND the human eye isn't as effective using the light that is produced.
Old 1/8/08, 11:24 AM
  #22  
Legacy TMS Member
 
mrkabc's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 13, 2005
Posts: 2,187
Received 38 Likes on 26 Posts
Re: stock headlights: Are we talking about the same car here? My first impression when driving my brand-new 2005 'Stang home from the dealer was just how much WEAKER the stock headlights were from my 2002 'Stang. (which did have Silverstars BTW)

The stock 2005 lighting was SO bad I bought the Saleen HID kit within a week of taking delivery of the car (and got hosed $1200 for it, but that's another story). The Saleens sure made up for the seriously terrible stock lights.

Maybe the reflector-less 2007 lights are better, I don't know. All I can say is that the OEM lights my car had were TERRIBLE and I couldn't get rid of them fast enough.

I'd skip wasting money on Silverstars (I wrote a thread about this a while ago and included comparison pics of OEM vs. Silverstars vs. HID for my foglights) and go HID for the headlights. I will concede that HID foglights are an overkill and do generate a lot of glare. However, nothing lights up the road like HID! If you have the means I highly recommend HID.
Old 1/8/08, 02:07 PM
  #23  
Mach 1 Member
 
Dixie_Flatline's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 16, 2007
Location: West Chicago
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrkabc
Re: stock headlights: Are we talking about the same car here? My first impression when driving my brand-new 2005 'Stang home from the dealer was just how much WEAKER the stock headlights were from my 2002 'Stang. (which did have Silverstars BTW)

The stock 2005 lighting was SO bad I bought the Saleen HID kit within a week of taking delivery of the car (and got hosed $1200 for it, but that's another story). The Saleens sure made up for the seriously terrible stock lights.

Maybe the reflector-less 2007 lights are better, I don't know. All I can say is that the OEM lights my car had were TERRIBLE and I couldn't get rid of them fast enough.

I'd skip wasting money on Silverstars (I wrote a thread about this a while ago and included comparison pics of OEM vs. Silverstars vs. HID for my foglights) and go HID for the headlights. I will concede that HID foglights are an overkill and do generate a lot of glare. However, nothing lights up the road like HID! If you have the means I highly recommend HID.
I wish I could have gotten the OEM HIDs on my '08, but my choices were limited and dealers in the area don't spec lot cars with HIDs for some reason.

What are your impressions of the Saleen kit? Do you get much peripheral glare? Are they capsule swaps or full replacement assemblies designed for HID reflections?

I'm leery of capsule swaps becuase the HID element is in a different height and fore/aft position than the halogen capsule. This changes all the lense reflections and causes dangerous peripheral glare.
Old 1/8/08, 02:35 PM
  #24  
Legacy TMS Member
 
mrkabc's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 13, 2005
Posts: 2,187
Received 38 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by Dixie_Flatline
What are your impressions of the Saleen kit? Do you get much peripheral glare? Are they capsule swaps or full replacement assemblies designed for HID reflections?
The Saleen kit is a completely different headlight assembly. It is NOT a capsule swap. It uses a motorized reflector to simulate "high" beam (there is only one capsule for both high and low) and does not glare any more than the stock headlight assembly. The beam pattern was designed with HID lighting in mind, and they really do light up the road much better than stock!

Contrast my Saleens with my HID equipped fogs - since my fog lights are the stock assemblies with HID bulbs, hoo boy do they glare!!!

The down side of Saleens: There have been issues with the longevity of the reflectorized coating of the "round" portion of the headlight. The HID capsules have been burning the reflectors. I don't know if Saleen ever fixed the problem, but they refused to stand behind their product when I and others on this board complained. I'd have to give a huge to Saleen's customer service and willingness to tackle a known quality issue.

If I were upgrading to HIDs today I'd probably look in to the possibility of retrofitting the stock assemblies - it's the best of both worlds. High beam functionality without mounting 4 ballasts, and OEM/DOT approved levels of glare and beam pattern.
Old 1/8/08, 02:48 PM
  #25  
Bullitt Member
 
c25sailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 9, 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RRRoamer
Personally, the reduced lamp life of the Silverstars just doesn't concern me.

What I HAVE done on several occasions is replace headlamps because the light level had fallen off due to age of the bulb. More and more recently, I have had to replace those plastic light housing assemblies because they have aged with UV exposore and become very yellow, blocking light output significantly. I actually kind of miss the old sealed beam glass bulbs a bit due to that.
For what it's worth -- I found a product at Autozone that does a really good job polishing the yellowed plastic. I'll try to post the name from home -- but I used it on the yellowing lenses of the 95 explorer -- and presto -- the looked clear and new. I have used the Silverstars -- and haven't had any problem with premature burnout. They seem to last about like halogen bulbs from my experience. I like the light better. The advantage to HIDs is not the color as much as the Aim. The HIDs on the Mustang do not seem to have quite as sharp of a cutoff as those on my 06 Acura. On that one -- it is a very sharp line of demarcation. I'm suspecting the reason for that is the fact that they are reflectors as opposed to projectors. But that's just a suspicion.
Old 1/10/08, 05:23 AM
  #26  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
05YellowGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 24, 2005
Location: Delray Beach , FL
Posts: 2,227
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Guy's , there's quite a lot of opinions in this thread and I thought I'd just add one more. I got rid of my OEM fogs quite sometime ago and have had PIAA driving lights which are white. So a couple of months ago I decided to swap out my head lights and get something with white light to match and I found the Luminics and ordered a set. I must say that they didn't put out nearly as much light as the OEM ones. If I had a car next to me and we had our lights on , you barely tell mine were on. I don't know if this is normal or not , but the set I got definitely were not very bright and would just barely light the road. Yesterday I got a set of Silverstars and they really light up the road. It's been so long since I had the OEM bulbs , so I can't say how much better these are than the OEM ones. Also the quality of the craftsmanship is much better on the Silverstars , when I tried to pull the harness off the Luminics the plastic piece around the pins pulled of both of them. They were only held on with a small dab of glue. Also the metal around the glass was thin and cheap compared to the OEM and Silverstars. So if anyone is considering swapping out their bulbs , definitely go with the Silverstars ...
Old 1/23/08, 09:22 PM
  #27  
Member
 
johnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 21, 2007
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
do you have a part number
Old 1/24/08, 05:21 AM
  #28  
Legacy TMS Member
 
metroplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 2, 2006
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 4,778
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by c25sailor
For what it's worth -- I found a product at Autozone that does a really good job polishing the yellowed plastic. I'll try to post the name from home -- but I used it on the yellowing lenses of the 95 explorer -- and presto -- the looked clear and new. I have used the Silverstars -- and haven't had any problem with premature burnout. They seem to last about like halogen bulbs from my experience. I like the light better. The advantage to HIDs is not the color as much as the Aim. The HIDs on the Mustang do not seem to have quite as sharp of a cutoff as those on my 06 Acura. On that one -- it is a very sharp line of demarcation. I'm suspecting the reason for that is the fact that they are reflectors as opposed to projectors. But that's just a suspicion.
The problem with many of the lenses is fogging on the inside which you can't remove or polish. I've had lots of luck using Brasso to polish yellow/cloudy residue on the outside of the lenses. Usually the cloudiness is from the polycarbonate lens coating peeling off.

As for the aim, the 2008 Mustang HID uses D3R HID capsules and relies on a reflector assembly. Chances are it says "VOR" somewhere on the outside of the lens just like the stock halogen S197 headlamps.

The light output of HIDs and halogens on OEM headlamps can be quite close. What remains is the light color which DOES have an impact on how "bright" you think the light is (all in the perception). There have been a lot of studies done on this issue (white vs yellow light) and so far I have not seen a general consensus other than that white light "appears" brighter.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
21
2/10/17 07:12 PM
carid
Vendor Showcase
2
7/8/16 08:53 AM
boz
Introductions
7
10/1/15 04:47 PM
GLOCKer
General Mustang Chat
2
9/28/15 05:20 PM
scott6809
2010-2014 Mustang
25
9/12/15 11:44 PM



Quick Reply: Any new info on Silverstar Ultras for us?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:09 AM.