3.55 Axle
#21
#22
Yeah, that's what the problem is. The difference in price is going to over $1000 since I'll have to get the premium instead of the deluxe. Errr!
#23
-Wayne
#24
The 3.55s were a $87 option for my 07 GT (invoice price). If you use an A/D/X/Z-Plan, that is what you pay.
I don't want anything higher than 3.55s because of the gas mileage. I already turn 2000+ RPM at 70+ mph in 5th gear. With 3.73s, 3.90s, 4.10s, etc... it only goes higher and higher (less and less gas mileage). I currently net 19-19.5 mpg in combined city/highway driving with the stock 3.55s and am impressed.
I don't want anything higher than 3.55s because of the gas mileage. I already turn 2000+ RPM at 70+ mph in 5th gear. With 3.73s, 3.90s, 4.10s, etc... it only goes higher and higher (less and less gas mileage). I currently net 19-19.5 mpg in combined city/highway driving with the stock 3.55s and am impressed.
#25
Well, the price has gone up for 2008. The invoice price for a 3.55 on an 08 GT is 261, plus you can only get it now as part of the Premium package so that costs even more.
Maybe I'll just stick with the 3.31 since you would probably get better gas mileage with it?
Maybe I'll just stick with the 3.31 since you would probably get better gas mileage with it?
The 3.55s were a $87 option for my 07 GT (invoice price). If you use an A/D/X/Z-Plan, that is what you pay.
I don't want anything higher than 3.55s because of the gas mileage. I already turn 2000+ RPM at 70+ mph in 5th gear. With 3.73s, 3.90s, 4.10s, etc... it only goes higher and higher (less and less gas mileage). I currently net 19-19.5 mpg in combined city/highway driving with the stock 3.55s and am impressed.
I don't want anything higher than 3.55s because of the gas mileage. I already turn 2000+ RPM at 70+ mph in 5th gear. With 3.73s, 3.90s, 4.10s, etc... it only goes higher and higher (less and less gas mileage). I currently net 19-19.5 mpg in combined city/highway driving with the stock 3.55s and am impressed.
#26
3:55 even if I were to change after. Yes I think the gas mileage is better with the 3.31 gears but not that much. I had the 3.55 on an 05 and an 06. Now I have the 3.31 and when cruising on the highway instead of an easy stay in 4th, the car cries out for me to go into fifth with the 3.31's, good choice going with it. like this "waaaaaaaa"
#27
I sure don't get Ford's logic in the decision to make the 3:55s avialable only on the Premium. I think lots of performance-oriented buyers want a more basic car - without leather, etc.
At $100, the decision was a no-brainer.
BTW, when I first test drove an 07, I was a little disappointed at the lack of "snap". Later I realized it did NOT have the 3:55s...it DOES make a difference.
At $100, the decision was a no-brainer.
BTW, when I first test drove an 07, I was a little disappointed at the lack of "snap". Later I realized it did NOT have the 3:55s...it DOES make a difference.
#28
Yes, I think maybe you're right, I think maybe the GT that I test drove a few years back may not have had the 3.55 gears. It didn't go as fast from 0 to 40 as I might have liked. One of the reasons I bought a V6 instead.....
I sure don't get Ford's logic in the decision to make the 3:55s avialable only on the Premium. I think lots of performance-oriented buyers want a more basic car - without leather, etc.
At $100, the decision was a no-brainer.
BTW, when I first test drove an 07, I was a little disappointed at the lack of "snap". Later I realized it did NOT have the 3:55s...it DOES make a difference.
At $100, the decision was a no-brainer.
BTW, when I first test drove an 07, I was a little disappointed at the lack of "snap". Later I realized it did NOT have the 3:55s...it DOES make a difference.
#30
Ford's options for the S197 don't make sense at all. Who cares about fake plastic body cladding. I'm sure buyers wanted to see performance mods/options.
Anyhow, my Stang turns about 2200-2300 RPM at 80 mph (3.55s and 17" tires). I know my speedo reads 3 mph faster than the GPS, so take it FWIW. If I had to do it again, I'd go with 3.31s for even better gas mileage but I'm happy with the $87 3.55s. I know I'll never upgrade the gear ratio anyhow.
Anyhow, my Stang turns about 2200-2300 RPM at 80 mph (3.55s and 17" tires). I know my speedo reads 3 mph faster than the GPS, so take it FWIW. If I had to do it again, I'd go with 3.31s for even better gas mileage but I'm happy with the $87 3.55s. I know I'll never upgrade the gear ratio anyhow.
#31
Thanks for the info. I think the GT I test drove a couple of years ago had the 3.31 gear as well. So this time I ordered the 3.55 just to get a little extra performance.
I sure don't get Ford's logic in the decision to make the 3:55s avialable only on the Premium. I think lots of performance-oriented buyers want a more basic car - without leather, etc.
At $100, the decision was a no-brainer.
BTW, when I first test drove an 07, I was a little disappointed at the lack of "snap". Later I realized it did NOT have the 3:55s...it DOES make a difference.
At $100, the decision was a no-brainer.
BTW, when I first test drove an 07, I was a little disappointed at the lack of "snap". Later I realized it did NOT have the 3:55s...it DOES make a difference.
#32
If you drove an auto a few years ago, it was a 3.31 axle. If it was a 05-06 Manual, it was a 3.55. There was no option until 07, when 3.31 was standard on all GT's and a 3.55 was an option on manual tranny cars only.
#34
I'd go 3.55's. I got the impression after driving on the highway for 7 hours, at 70 mph with 3.55's, that it could use a slight increase in ratio. I installed 4.10's and they're great for the city but now I feel they're too high a ratio for the highway. 3.90's are probably ideal but FRPP doesn't make them. I won't buy any other brand, so 3.73's may be my alternative or I'm just going to reinstall my 3.55's. Tough decisions, for me, when the speed limits rise from 60 mph where I live to 70-75 mph crossing to the USA side of the border.
I think you may be disappointed if you get the 3.31's and try to go up against the 3.55 equipped stangs. It all depends on what your plans are for your car.
I think you may be disappointed if you get the 3.31's and try to go up against the 3.55 equipped stangs. It all depends on what your plans are for your car.
#35
#36
Yes, I was afraid of being disappointed, so I ordered the 3.55's
Thanks for the reply!
Thanks for the reply!
I'd go 3.55's. I got the impression after driving on the highway for 7 hours, at 70 mph with 3.55's, that it could use a slight increase in ratio. I installed 4.10's and they're great for the city but now I feel they're too high a ratio for the highway. 3.90's are probably ideal but FRPP doesn't make them. I won't buy any other brand, so 3.73's may be my alternative or I'm just going to reinstall my 3.55's. Tough decisions, for me, when the speed limits rise from 60 mph where I live to 70-75 mph crossing to the USA side of the border.
I think you may be disappointed if you get the 3.31's and try to go up against the 3.55 equipped stangs. It all depends on what your plans are for your car.
I think you may be disappointed if you get the 3.31's and try to go up against the 3.55 equipped stangs. It all depends on what your plans are for your car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rando
2010-2014 Mustang
8
8/25/21 11:12 AM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
9/24/15 08:15 PM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
9/10/15 12:44 PM