2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

05 Mustang: Slower than the 04 GT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 02:30 PM
  #21  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Yeah just 100lbs lighter ain't half bad...
Considering the rumours that it weighed 3600+lbs
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 04:39 PM
  #22  
gw186's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 9, 2004
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
I'm going to have to lose some weight, don't want to get smoked by some skinny kid in a '04
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 05:23 PM
  #23  
Shea's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 24, 2004
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Does anyone REALLY know how much it weighs? So far as I know, the only official specs are on the Ford site, and in the order guide. The order guide lists hp numbers, but not curb weight, or MPG, for that matter.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 08:17 PM
  #24  
200mphcobra's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: May 31, 2004
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
A rough rule of thumb is for every +/-100# you lose or gain about a 1/10 second in the 1/4 mi. It seems to work on my cars, and most of my buddies also (we spend a lot of time at the track). But I think one thing everyone is overlooking is how much better this cars potential is for hooking up better than an SN95. Also in its favor is better weight distribution. Add in a broader torque curve because of variable cam timing, and quite possibly a seriously underrated power number, we could see some low 13's, and I wouldn't be surprised for a 12.99.

Just don't expect Motor Trend, Road and Track or Car and Driver to do it.

They don't know how to speed shift.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 06:42 AM
  #25  
vega's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 18, 2004
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
The Ford GT was initially rated at 500 hp, now it's 550 hp. So being a 10 % increase, the Mustang GT should have 330 hp... B)
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 07:28 AM
  #26  
crazyhorse's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Here is why GT will be underrated:

Reason for underrating
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 07:34 AM
  #27  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
That would be a reason...but all anyone has to do is just think back to 99 when the Cobra's came out.

Ford doesn't want THAT happening again.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 07:46 AM
  #28  
SickofMyVWAlready's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 21, 2004
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Hey Boom: enlighten me. What happened with the 99 Cobras?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 09:44 AM
  #29  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally posted by SickofMyVWAlready@June 27, 2004, 7:49 AM
Hey Boom: enlighten me. What happened with the 99 Cobras?
Ford rated them at 305HP but I believe they were actually making a lot less (270-285?).
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 10:42 AM
  #30  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
In 99
Rated @ 320..but had roughly 300-305
Pre 99 they had 305 standard...
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 12:00 PM
  #31  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally posted by Boomer@June 27, 2004, 10:45 AM
In 99
Rated @ 320..but had roughly 300-305
Pre 99 they had 305 standard...
You're right. I guess Alzheimers is setting in...
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2004 | 06:15 AM
  #32  
GTJOHN's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 25, 2004
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
2005 Mustang GT ( So far )
0 - 60 = 5.2 ( Just as fast as the GTO )
Quarter mile = 13.9

I have been told by someone who got to test drive the car, that it felt like a mid-13's car. Ford told him the new 2005 will "Run and Hide, from the 2004 model"

I was hoping it would be a mid-13's car! We will have to wait and see!
That is another reason why I want Ford to produce a Mach1. I want a mid 13's Stang or faster! I do not want to have to go out and spend a bunch of $$$ on performance parts, just to keep up with my friends GTO. Spending 40k on a Cobra is not in my budget either!!
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2004 | 11:59 AM
  #33  
theguy10's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: June 16, 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Originally posted by crazyhorse@June 27, 2004, 7:31 AM
Here is why GT will be underrated:

Reason for underrating
Now consider the difference between Hyundai drivers and GT Drivers...If the Hyundai drivers can get this much money, imagine what the GT Driver's Lawyers could get....

edit:I read that as GT40
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2004 | 12:28 PM
  #34  
crazyhorse's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
I was referring specifically to the Mustang GT, but, applies to any car, really.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrp5150
SN95 Mustang
4
Aug 23, 2015 06:29 AM
Bert
2010-2014 Mustang
4
Jul 25, 2015 02:13 PM
MustStang79
2005-2009 Mustang
20
Jun 24, 2005 01:27 PM
moneyman
2005-2009 Mustang
0
Oct 14, 2004 08:59 AM
dave 02 gt
2005-2009 Mustang
24
Sep 28, 2004 06:24 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:44 PM.