96 gt
#4
Originally Posted by sampey43
Yes def one of the slowest, the 94-95 with the 5.0 werent the greatest either! Id shoot for a 99 and up convertible
#5
Cobra R Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perhaps it is late to post this but 96-98 GTs are a reliable bargain and with a PI heads, intake swap make 280hp just something to think about
P.S. any Mustang produced from 1973-86 is slower than a 96 model in stock form
P.S. any Mustang produced from 1973-86 is slower than a 96 model in stock form
Last edited by 97GT03SVT; 11/15/11 at 09:19 PM.
#7
#10
Cobra R Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: September 26, 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For some reason the newer 99-04 2V 4.6s don't rack up the miles like the 96-98s