Notices
Fox Mustangs 1979-1993 Mustangs Member Tech & Restoration Discussion

Sn-95 lower a arms

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12/10/12, 12:53 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
5.0>4.6jake's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 3, 2012
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sn-95 lower a arms

I have a 90 GT fox. Lookin to put sn-95 lower a arms on. Do I need to worry about ball joints, sway bar, and the rack and pinion and tie rods?
Old 12/10/12, 03:46 PM
  #2  
Cobra R Member
 
skunk21's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 11, 2011
Location: Mass
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sn 95 lower arms are longer by about an inch to an inch and a half. This is going to add a decent amount of camber also the fox tie rods are to short but the longer sn95 tie rod ends have different threads and don't work with teh fox stuff. I'm pretty sure you can go with sn95 inner and outers on both sides but you still are going to have camber. another better option is the bump steer kit from maximum motorsports that allows you to use the fox inner ties and you can adjust the tie rods.
http://www.maximummotorsports.com/st...roducts_id=452

you can also look at thier camber plates
http://www.maximummotorsports.com/st...roducts_id=254

I run the Ford racing M-3075-A front arm kit ( discontinued from ford ) and the maximum motorsports camber plates ( high qaulity pieces ) with 2001 bullitt springs.
Old 12/10/12, 04:16 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
5.0>4.6jake's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 3, 2012
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did that give you a lot more steering angle?
Old 12/10/12, 04:18 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
5.0>4.6jake's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 3, 2012
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not too worried about camber, when you start sliding out sideways the camber helps pull the front end through anyway from what I've been told. Don't want too much though or I'll wear through my hankooks lol.
Old 12/10/12, 06:38 PM
  #5  
Cobra R Member
 
skunk21's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 11, 2011
Location: Mass
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no it didn't. the longer sn95 arms give to much camber for the street trust me ( and depending on the wheel offset will be even more). use a bump steer kit. The FRPP lower arm kit I use had upgraded bushings and lower ball joints that where better than the stock fox units but used fox length lower arms. I also used the plates to have some adjustability since stock doesn't have any camber adjustment.
Old 12/10/12, 07:42 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
5.0>4.6jake's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 3, 2012
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh cause I looked up online and DriftWorks put sn95 a arms on to give their fox more steering angle then took off the steering rack limiter clips to give them more angle. It didn't say anything about having to use different tie rod ends or ball joints so that's why I put up this thread
Old 12/10/12, 08:20 PM
  #7  
Cobra R Member
 
skunk21's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 11, 2011
Location: Mass
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
still need to change the lower ball and tie rod ends, they are different. some have done the washer method on the lower ball joints but it is better to change them. just like sn95 guys will run fox lower arms to tuck in the front wheels, they have to make changes also. not sure why rack limiters would effect angle. iether way I gave you the best answer I can. put them on and find out I guess, just going by the info I know.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
10/2/15 01:00 PM
Evil_Capri
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
2
9/25/15 12:56 PM
GrabberBlue310
2012-2013 BOSS 302
6
9/17/15 08:21 AM



Quick Reply: Sn-95 lower a arms



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 PM.