'need value on '67 289v8
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
Joined: January 10, 2012
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
From: Granbury, TX
Originally Posted by Mybackisfast
that's some scary looking floor pans. they need to be redone correctly if you're
poking at buying it.
poking at buying it.
GT Member
Joined: March 21, 2012
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Reading, PA
Looks like a solid car. The floor pans will need to be worked on. It's a well optioned car (if original). Black paint is sometimes a good cover-up for imperfections, so be careful. I would pay maybe $5,000-$6,000 for it, $8,000 being max. That's just my opinion, someone correct me if you will.
Ben Garland
Ben Garland
Member
Joined: June 24, 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Looks like a solid car. The floor pans will need to be worked on. It's a well optioned car (if original). Black paint is sometimes a good cover-up for imperfections, so be careful. I would pay maybe $5,000-$6,000 for it, $8,000 being max. That's just my opinion, someone correct me if you will.
Ben Garland
Ben Garland
Member
Joined: June 24, 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
You can get a rough estimate at the NADA website. They seem a little high IMO. With a higher horse 289 and air, they value the car at about 10,700 for low retail. Low retail is normal wear requiring minimal reconditioning. By the pics I would put this car below that. Hope this helps.
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
Joined: January 10, 2012
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
From: Granbury, TX
Well, he originally was asking $12,000 for the car. I was thinking around $4,000....I've got him down to $4,800. I'm going to try to get him down to $4,500 before I commit.
Cobra Member
Joined: July 11, 2007
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Honestly, I would say $3-4k would be plenty for that car, but maybe I'm just a cheapskate...
EDIT: It is kinda neat that it appears to have the benchseat, which isn't seen terribly often on Mustangs. I don't think that really affects value one way or another but it is interesting.
EDIT: It is kinda neat that it appears to have the benchseat, which isn't seen terribly often on Mustangs. I don't think that really affects value one way or another but it is interesting.
Last edited by Wolfsburg; Jul 2, 2012 at 05:06 PM.
Member
Joined: July 1, 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Est.on 67 289
Sorry, youngstang90 but the last time I owned a 67 289 Stang was in 75.It was my first car.It was also a standard with about 60,000 miles.I really cant help you.Maybe you can help me.Were they all coming from the factory as 289HiPo's.I should know.